The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Oppose - certainly passes notability threshold, so keep it.
GreyShark (
dibra) 06:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Support: given the size of this article as it currently stands it clearly makes sense to merge. The annexation article clearly needs to include a section on disengagement and at the moment there is just no enough here for a main article link to be provided.
Ebonelm (
talk) 21:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support selective merge of this brief, ill-sourced article to
Jordanian annexation of the West Bank#Aftermath, target article is not overlong and this information is more intelligible amd useful as part of the larger topic.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 12:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment: The topic could deserve a standalone article, but the article as it is now is not very good either as an article or as a stub. It should either be cleaned up and expanded substantially (if someone has time) or just merged into the other article. If the merging option is selected, I don't think it should prejudice against recreation of this article if someone is later sufficiently motivated to do a good job.
OtterAM (
talk) 16:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Discussion should be revived.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 08:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Support merging, the article has narrowly two paragraphs about the disengagement, the rest is only background to it. Should be merged.
Doodoo Bo (
talk) 21:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Support merging, the occupation already redirects to the annexation, so that article could easily be renamed and encompass both ideas.
User:Artoenedits 19:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The annexation in 1950 and the disengagement in 1988 both pass notability threshold and took place in entirely different political and legal circumstances. Each of them deserves a proper article. The fact that neither article is properly written is reason to expand both, not to merge them.
YR on wiki (
talk) 11:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The topic is notable for an article, it is simply too short. Instead of merging, more information should be added to this article. It is worth noting that the Jordanian control ended in 1967, while the disengagement was in 1988.--
Bolter21(
talk to me) 07:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The separate article on the "Disengagement of Jordanian forces" is justifiable (notable) in itself, whereas the other article deals more broadly on the period of Jordanian occupation of the western parts of Palestine (1948–1967), which had previously been an "undivided" country (whole Palestine) occupied by foreign powers (Britain, Ottoman Turks, Mamluks of Egypt, etc.).
Davidbena (
talk) 09:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Support merge. No WP:RS uses the title of this article to describe anything. The article would need significant reworking and a new title, so easier to merge.
Onceinawhile (
talk) 12:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Oppose - certainly passes notability threshold, so keep it.
GreyShark (
dibra) 06:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Support: given the size of this article as it currently stands it clearly makes sense to merge. The annexation article clearly needs to include a section on disengagement and at the moment there is just no enough here for a main article link to be provided.
Ebonelm (
talk) 21:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support selective merge of this brief, ill-sourced article to
Jordanian annexation of the West Bank#Aftermath, target article is not overlong and this information is more intelligible amd useful as part of the larger topic.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 12:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment: The topic could deserve a standalone article, but the article as it is now is not very good either as an article or as a stub. It should either be cleaned up and expanded substantially (if someone has time) or just merged into the other article. If the merging option is selected, I don't think it should prejudice against recreation of this article if someone is later sufficiently motivated to do a good job.
OtterAM (
talk) 16:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Discussion should be revived.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 08:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Support merging, the article has narrowly two paragraphs about the disengagement, the rest is only background to it. Should be merged.
Doodoo Bo (
talk) 21:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Support merging, the occupation already redirects to the annexation, so that article could easily be renamed and encompass both ideas.
User:Artoenedits 19:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The annexation in 1950 and the disengagement in 1988 both pass notability threshold and took place in entirely different political and legal circumstances. Each of them deserves a proper article. The fact that neither article is properly written is reason to expand both, not to merge them.
YR on wiki (
talk) 11:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The topic is notable for an article, it is simply too short. Instead of merging, more information should be added to this article. It is worth noting that the Jordanian control ended in 1967, while the disengagement was in 1988.--
Bolter21(
talk to me) 07:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The separate article on the "Disengagement of Jordanian forces" is justifiable (notable) in itself, whereas the other article deals more broadly on the period of Jordanian occupation of the western parts of Palestine (1948–1967), which had previously been an "undivided" country (whole Palestine) occupied by foreign powers (Britain, Ottoman Turks, Mamluks of Egypt, etc.).
Davidbena (
talk) 09:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Support merge. No WP:RS uses the title of this article to describe anything. The article would need significant reworking and a new title, so easier to merge.
Onceinawhile (
talk) 12:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.