This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jagadish Chandra Bose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Jagadish Chandra Bose was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please discuss here Wikipedia:Duplicate_articles#J, Alren 15:59, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The first name should be spelt correctly in the title as "Jagadish" and not "Jagdish".
Despite the fact he spells it himself "Jagadis" on his patents? Please explain.
The article http://rspl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/70/459-466/273 is incorrectly referred to as "On Elektromotive [...]" with a 'k' in "Electro-".
Could this "Sir" title prefix be properly wikified, please? Perhaps Sir#Formal styling?, or Knight#Becoming a knight, or Knight#Honorific orders, or British_honours_system#Indian_Orders? TIA.
Jerome Potts 06:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I believe IEEE published a major reassessment of Bose with the conclusion that his work defintiely was prior to that of Marconi. I will try to get that reference. Meanwhile, here is something related: http://www.tuc.nrao.edu/~demerson/bose/bose.html DaveBorman 19:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Here's another reference: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/279/5350/476 DaveBorman 19:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ola tudo bem amor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.236.41.136 ( talk) 09:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I have made a few changes in the infobox consistent with Wikipedia:Don't overuse flags. Also moved the available image inside the infobox. These changes make this article consistent with other articles e.g. featured article on Rabindranath Tagore. These edits were reverted without any explanation once. So, I request anyone, not agreeing with the changes, to please discuss concerns here.
Bharatveer ( talk · contribs) continues to add "Indian" (linking to Republic of India's article) as Bose's nationality. Actually, unless one went back in time and changed history, Republic of India exists only after 1947. Before which, it was "British India", and citizens of the place were called "British Indian"s, which was also printed on their passports.
Of course, if Bharatveer wants to link to "India" (the republic), I will be happy to claim that Bose was a "Bangladeshi" national too, under whatever logic BV has. Otherwise, I'd like to see why a person having "British India"n passport, living in "British India" can't be termed as such. -- Ragib 16:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
This article needs a lot of improvement to reach GA. At the moment, it has prose, referencing and POV/peacock/weasel issues
Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 05:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
He knew that long waves were advantageous because of their great penetrative power but realised their disadvantages for studying the light like-properties of those electric waves.
This directly goes against the common scientific understanding that shorter waves have greater penetrative power, while long waves travel longer distances.
This phenomena is used for doctor's x-rays and is stated Ian's Hickson's Electromagnetic Spectrum website http://academia.hixie.ch/bath/em/home.html
if for some reason my understanding of the penetrating power of waves is incorrect. I would like to see a correction in the langauged used to describe "greater penetrative power" of the "long waves".
Hi All,
I have noticed that in the "God Is (Spiritual Message)" delivered by Mahatma Gandhi in London, 1931, the following sentence appears:
"thanks to the marvelous researches of Sir J. C. Bose it can now be proved that even matter is life"
With my limited knowledge I couldn't find out what research the line was refering to.
However, I think it could be relevant (as well as extremely interesting!) if someone were able to clarify this point in this page.
Thank you!
Maybe this is what you're looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagadish_Chandra_Bose#Study_of_metal_fatigue_and_cell_response — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.248.45.78 ( talk) 16:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Are these studies validated by modern methods or by any other means ? Hiperion Gonarch ( talk) 04:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Bose's radio wave works was one year after Nikola Tesla made the first public demonstration of radio communication in 1893. See "Nikola Tesla, 1856 - 1943". IEEE History Center, IEEE, 2003. (cf., In a lecture-demonstration given in St. Louis in [1893] - two years before Marconi's first experiments - Tesla also predicted wireless communication; the apparatus that he employed contained all the elements of spark and continuous wave that were incorporated into radio transmitters before the advent of the vacuum tube.) DO NOT removed this as it is a POV edit to do so. Thank you. J. D. Redding 00:05, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Bose is linked to from Nine Unknown Men, an odd piece of Theosophical lore. There are claims made that Bose believed in the legend, but I can't find a reliable source for it. Can anyone confirm or deny this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strangething ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted a couple of Bangladeshi nationalist changes. Calling Bose "Bangladeshi" is an anachronism; he died long before Bangladesh was founded. At Bose's time he was unquestionably British Indian. On the other hand, his nationality shouldn't be given as " Indian" either; that links to the modern Republic of India, which is also an anachronism.
In the process, I also reverted the mention of two of his books in the lead. Since we do not mention anything about those books (except their titles) in the article proper, they are not prominent enough for the lead, which should be a summary of the article. Huon ( talk) 19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
As it can be seen, after a thorough discussion, it was concluded that Jagadish Chandra Bose's nationality should be shown as "British Indian" having linked to British Raj since he was born before 1947, the year when India became independent. We can't determine Bose's nationality just by going with a book written by Amartya Sen. Please reach a consensus rather than changing the nationality unilaterally. -- Zayeem (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
None of the random websites you mentioned are reliable compared to a Nobel laureate. However I will not revert you more but let other editors comment here. Solomon 7968 14:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
-- Zayeem (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
The first Indian citizen to be elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society was Ardaseer Cursetjee. .....Regarded as one of the great mathematical prodigies, Srinivasa Aaiyangar Ramanujan was the Royal Society's second Indian Fellow. .....Raman was elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society in 1924, making him the fourth Indian FRS, after Cursetjee, Ramanujan and Sir Jagdish Chandra Bose.
Solomon 7968 15:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
@ Kmzayeem Every single commnent by yours is unsupported by any reliable source. You previously branded a official Royal Society website as "problematic". Don't repeat this type of behaviour again. We go by academic sources and do you think Amartya Sen, Danielou, Stein and Arnold, Metcalf and Metcalf are all "problematic"? To Ugog Nizdast Articles related to historic Indian personalities are well among the worst in wikipedia. None of them follows what the sources say, it is useless to point to other articles. By default we will go here what the sources brand Jagadish Chandra Bose. Solomon 7968 07:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Brittanica, an authoritative source clearly identifies Bose as Indian, and so do a number of reliable sources mentioned by users above. The heading line should mention Indian, with perhaps a link to British India instead of current day Republic of India. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations ( talk) 23:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Birthplace changed with ref from Britannica per User_talk:Ctg4Rahat/Archive_3#Birthplace_of_Acharya_Jadadish_Chandra_Bose - Rahat ( Talk * Contributions) 06:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
A citizen of undivided India is referred to as Indian, just in the same way as Rabindranath Tagore is referred to as "Indian" nobel laureate.
I don't see much about his personal life, only 'early life' as it pertains to scientific education. Would you please add more about his personal life, beliefs, and death? I am interested in seeing the religious beliefs of accomplished individuals. -- Newagelink ( talk) 04:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He was born in India, not in Bangladesh. As a matter of fact, there is no Bangladesh in 1858. Sumaprasanth ( talk) 06:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Last line of "Legacy" section. Should the Birthday be Nov 29 or Nov 30? Birthday ambiguity. I believe it is Nov 30. Jmcnear ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Jmcnear ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
When the nationality of Muhamad Ali Jinnah who is also born in British India written as Pakistani, why can't we have Bose's nationality as "Indian". Jinnah and many leaders who are born in so called "British India" are written as Pakistani in history, and Gandhi and many leaders who are born in the same "British India" are called Indians in history, why can't we call Bose an Indian? why is this discrimination shown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.141.31.171 ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
In the Science Fiction section, these three hyperlinks point to pages that don't exist:
John Clinton Bradley ( talk) 15:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
this is interesting! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.207.182.98 ( talk) 21:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
There are many sources that talk about Bose's contributions to plant science, but few bother to mention that none of it seems at all credible. This sentence in the article
"His major contribution in the field of biophysics was the demonstration of the electrical nature of the conduction of various stimuli (e.g., wounds, chemical agents) in plants, which were earlier thought to be of a chemical nature. These claims were later proven experimentally.[27]"
references a Nature paper (Wildon et al.) that doesn't cite or even mention Bose. Wildon et al. is not experimental proof of Bose's claims, this article doesn't even make it clear what Bose's claims precisely were. Any claims I've read from Bose do not seem to align with our basic understanding of plant biology today. Hopefully there is a good review out there that debunks some of Bose's apparent claims; this should be a subsection. Maneesh ( talk) 22:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jagadish Chandra Bose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A link to the Bangla original of Palatak Tufan, e.g. https://bn.wikisource.org/s/e9, should be added for the benefit of the readers. [1] Jyot1.5hompad0k ( talk) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jagadish Chandra Bose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Cleve_Backster#Findings
After going through various links and sources I found that Jagadish Chandra Bose did not hypothesize that Plant feel pain or understand affections. These are the words of Cleve Backster. His work was inspired by Dr Jagdish Chandra Bose as his personal claim.
Its seems fellow wikipedians who added this must have gotten confused by the article cited above. It uses pronoun "he" and anyone would assume the "he" is Dr Jagadish Chandra Bose rather the "he" is Cleve Backster.
I have read the books of Jagdish Chandra Bose and he makes no such claim or deduce no such theory on his findings. His findings were as mentioned in the rest of the section broadly that plants respond to stimuli. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.59.61 ( talk) 05:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Fountains of Bryn Mawr: Jagadish Chandra Bose is Bengali ethnically and geographically from the Indian subcontinent. It is completely neutral point of view. I don't understand your reversal here. Wikipedia has no WP:DEADLINE. Things can be changed. Kindly advise. ( Highpeaks35 ( talk) 20:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC))
Amrita62, can you please go through the numerous discussions where it has been decided to leave out Bose's nationality? Calling him Indian is anachronism as " Indian" only refers to the citizens of Republic of India which came into being in 1947, whereas Bose died in 1937. This was also discussed in a dispute resolution attempt between WikiProjects Bangladesh and India. Unilaterally changing this longstanding version without any discussion is disruptive. And can you explain how do you find the mention about the poll Greatest Bengali of all time a WP:Puffery and WP:SOAPBOX? Lead is supposed to be a summary of the entire article and mentioning his position in the poll summarizes his legacy/honor. -- Zayeem (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi
I would like to reorganize the article to make it easier to add new information. For example, an editor may wish to add more information regarding Bose's life during the phase of his plant research, which may or may not be directly related to his research. From this point of view, it would be practical to separate the article into two major sections, the first dealing with his life and the second dealing exclusively with his research. This is what is being done in the article on Albert Einstein. Below are the sections of the proposed reorganization. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know here.
Life and Career
- Early life and education
- Professorship at presidency college (introduction)
- Bose Institute
- Personal Views
Scientific Career
- Microwave Radio Research
- Plant Research
- Study of metal fatigue and cell response
Science fiction
Legacy and Honors
Publications
Notes
References
Further reading
External links RamasSquirrel ( talk) 09:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jagadish Chandra Bose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Jagadish Chandra Bose was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please discuss here Wikipedia:Duplicate_articles#J, Alren 15:59, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The first name should be spelt correctly in the title as "Jagadish" and not "Jagdish".
Despite the fact he spells it himself "Jagadis" on his patents? Please explain.
The article http://rspl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/70/459-466/273 is incorrectly referred to as "On Elektromotive [...]" with a 'k' in "Electro-".
Could this "Sir" title prefix be properly wikified, please? Perhaps Sir#Formal styling?, or Knight#Becoming a knight, or Knight#Honorific orders, or British_honours_system#Indian_Orders? TIA.
Jerome Potts 06:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I believe IEEE published a major reassessment of Bose with the conclusion that his work defintiely was prior to that of Marconi. I will try to get that reference. Meanwhile, here is something related: http://www.tuc.nrao.edu/~demerson/bose/bose.html DaveBorman 19:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Here's another reference: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/279/5350/476 DaveBorman 19:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ola tudo bem amor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.236.41.136 ( talk) 09:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I have made a few changes in the infobox consistent with Wikipedia:Don't overuse flags. Also moved the available image inside the infobox. These changes make this article consistent with other articles e.g. featured article on Rabindranath Tagore. These edits were reverted without any explanation once. So, I request anyone, not agreeing with the changes, to please discuss concerns here.
Bharatveer ( talk · contribs) continues to add "Indian" (linking to Republic of India's article) as Bose's nationality. Actually, unless one went back in time and changed history, Republic of India exists only after 1947. Before which, it was "British India", and citizens of the place were called "British Indian"s, which was also printed on their passports.
Of course, if Bharatveer wants to link to "India" (the republic), I will be happy to claim that Bose was a "Bangladeshi" national too, under whatever logic BV has. Otherwise, I'd like to see why a person having "British India"n passport, living in "British India" can't be termed as such. -- Ragib 16:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
This article needs a lot of improvement to reach GA. At the moment, it has prose, referencing and POV/peacock/weasel issues
Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 05:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
He knew that long waves were advantageous because of their great penetrative power but realised their disadvantages for studying the light like-properties of those electric waves.
This directly goes against the common scientific understanding that shorter waves have greater penetrative power, while long waves travel longer distances.
This phenomena is used for doctor's x-rays and is stated Ian's Hickson's Electromagnetic Spectrum website http://academia.hixie.ch/bath/em/home.html
if for some reason my understanding of the penetrating power of waves is incorrect. I would like to see a correction in the langauged used to describe "greater penetrative power" of the "long waves".
Hi All,
I have noticed that in the "God Is (Spiritual Message)" delivered by Mahatma Gandhi in London, 1931, the following sentence appears:
"thanks to the marvelous researches of Sir J. C. Bose it can now be proved that even matter is life"
With my limited knowledge I couldn't find out what research the line was refering to.
However, I think it could be relevant (as well as extremely interesting!) if someone were able to clarify this point in this page.
Thank you!
Maybe this is what you're looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagadish_Chandra_Bose#Study_of_metal_fatigue_and_cell_response — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.248.45.78 ( talk) 16:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Are these studies validated by modern methods or by any other means ? Hiperion Gonarch ( talk) 04:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Bose's radio wave works was one year after Nikola Tesla made the first public demonstration of radio communication in 1893. See "Nikola Tesla, 1856 - 1943". IEEE History Center, IEEE, 2003. (cf., In a lecture-demonstration given in St. Louis in [1893] - two years before Marconi's first experiments - Tesla also predicted wireless communication; the apparatus that he employed contained all the elements of spark and continuous wave that were incorporated into radio transmitters before the advent of the vacuum tube.) DO NOT removed this as it is a POV edit to do so. Thank you. J. D. Redding 00:05, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Bose is linked to from Nine Unknown Men, an odd piece of Theosophical lore. There are claims made that Bose believed in the legend, but I can't find a reliable source for it. Can anyone confirm or deny this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strangething ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted a couple of Bangladeshi nationalist changes. Calling Bose "Bangladeshi" is an anachronism; he died long before Bangladesh was founded. At Bose's time he was unquestionably British Indian. On the other hand, his nationality shouldn't be given as " Indian" either; that links to the modern Republic of India, which is also an anachronism.
In the process, I also reverted the mention of two of his books in the lead. Since we do not mention anything about those books (except their titles) in the article proper, they are not prominent enough for the lead, which should be a summary of the article. Huon ( talk) 19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
As it can be seen, after a thorough discussion, it was concluded that Jagadish Chandra Bose's nationality should be shown as "British Indian" having linked to British Raj since he was born before 1947, the year when India became independent. We can't determine Bose's nationality just by going with a book written by Amartya Sen. Please reach a consensus rather than changing the nationality unilaterally. -- Zayeem (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
None of the random websites you mentioned are reliable compared to a Nobel laureate. However I will not revert you more but let other editors comment here. Solomon 7968 14:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
-- Zayeem (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
The first Indian citizen to be elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society was Ardaseer Cursetjee. .....Regarded as one of the great mathematical prodigies, Srinivasa Aaiyangar Ramanujan was the Royal Society's second Indian Fellow. .....Raman was elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society in 1924, making him the fourth Indian FRS, after Cursetjee, Ramanujan and Sir Jagdish Chandra Bose.
Solomon 7968 15:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
@ Kmzayeem Every single commnent by yours is unsupported by any reliable source. You previously branded a official Royal Society website as "problematic". Don't repeat this type of behaviour again. We go by academic sources and do you think Amartya Sen, Danielou, Stein and Arnold, Metcalf and Metcalf are all "problematic"? To Ugog Nizdast Articles related to historic Indian personalities are well among the worst in wikipedia. None of them follows what the sources say, it is useless to point to other articles. By default we will go here what the sources brand Jagadish Chandra Bose. Solomon 7968 07:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Brittanica, an authoritative source clearly identifies Bose as Indian, and so do a number of reliable sources mentioned by users above. The heading line should mention Indian, with perhaps a link to British India instead of current day Republic of India. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations ( talk) 23:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Birthplace changed with ref from Britannica per User_talk:Ctg4Rahat/Archive_3#Birthplace_of_Acharya_Jadadish_Chandra_Bose - Rahat ( Talk * Contributions) 06:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
A citizen of undivided India is referred to as Indian, just in the same way as Rabindranath Tagore is referred to as "Indian" nobel laureate.
I don't see much about his personal life, only 'early life' as it pertains to scientific education. Would you please add more about his personal life, beliefs, and death? I am interested in seeing the religious beliefs of accomplished individuals. -- Newagelink ( talk) 04:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He was born in India, not in Bangladesh. As a matter of fact, there is no Bangladesh in 1858. Sumaprasanth ( talk) 06:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Last line of "Legacy" section. Should the Birthday be Nov 29 or Nov 30? Birthday ambiguity. I believe it is Nov 30. Jmcnear ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Jmcnear ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
When the nationality of Muhamad Ali Jinnah who is also born in British India written as Pakistani, why can't we have Bose's nationality as "Indian". Jinnah and many leaders who are born in so called "British India" are written as Pakistani in history, and Gandhi and many leaders who are born in the same "British India" are called Indians in history, why can't we call Bose an Indian? why is this discrimination shown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.141.31.171 ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
In the Science Fiction section, these three hyperlinks point to pages that don't exist:
John Clinton Bradley ( talk) 15:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
this is interesting! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.207.182.98 ( talk) 21:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
There are many sources that talk about Bose's contributions to plant science, but few bother to mention that none of it seems at all credible. This sentence in the article
"His major contribution in the field of biophysics was the demonstration of the electrical nature of the conduction of various stimuli (e.g., wounds, chemical agents) in plants, which were earlier thought to be of a chemical nature. These claims were later proven experimentally.[27]"
references a Nature paper (Wildon et al.) that doesn't cite or even mention Bose. Wildon et al. is not experimental proof of Bose's claims, this article doesn't even make it clear what Bose's claims precisely were. Any claims I've read from Bose do not seem to align with our basic understanding of plant biology today. Hopefully there is a good review out there that debunks some of Bose's apparent claims; this should be a subsection. Maneesh ( talk) 22:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jagadish Chandra Bose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A link to the Bangla original of Palatak Tufan, e.g. https://bn.wikisource.org/s/e9, should be added for the benefit of the readers. [1] Jyot1.5hompad0k ( talk) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jagadish Chandra Bose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Cleve_Backster#Findings
After going through various links and sources I found that Jagadish Chandra Bose did not hypothesize that Plant feel pain or understand affections. These are the words of Cleve Backster. His work was inspired by Dr Jagdish Chandra Bose as his personal claim.
Its seems fellow wikipedians who added this must have gotten confused by the article cited above. It uses pronoun "he" and anyone would assume the "he" is Dr Jagadish Chandra Bose rather the "he" is Cleve Backster.
I have read the books of Jagdish Chandra Bose and he makes no such claim or deduce no such theory on his findings. His findings were as mentioned in the rest of the section broadly that plants respond to stimuli. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.59.61 ( talk) 05:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Fountains of Bryn Mawr: Jagadish Chandra Bose is Bengali ethnically and geographically from the Indian subcontinent. It is completely neutral point of view. I don't understand your reversal here. Wikipedia has no WP:DEADLINE. Things can be changed. Kindly advise. ( Highpeaks35 ( talk) 20:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC))
Amrita62, can you please go through the numerous discussions where it has been decided to leave out Bose's nationality? Calling him Indian is anachronism as " Indian" only refers to the citizens of Republic of India which came into being in 1947, whereas Bose died in 1937. This was also discussed in a dispute resolution attempt between WikiProjects Bangladesh and India. Unilaterally changing this longstanding version without any discussion is disruptive. And can you explain how do you find the mention about the poll Greatest Bengali of all time a WP:Puffery and WP:SOAPBOX? Lead is supposed to be a summary of the entire article and mentioning his position in the poll summarizes his legacy/honor. -- Zayeem (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi
I would like to reorganize the article to make it easier to add new information. For example, an editor may wish to add more information regarding Bose's life during the phase of his plant research, which may or may not be directly related to his research. From this point of view, it would be practical to separate the article into two major sections, the first dealing with his life and the second dealing exclusively with his research. This is what is being done in the article on Albert Einstein. Below are the sections of the proposed reorganization. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know here.
Life and Career
- Early life and education
- Professorship at presidency college (introduction)
- Bose Institute
- Personal Views
Scientific Career
- Microwave Radio Research
- Plant Research
- Study of metal fatigue and cell response
Science fiction
Legacy and Honors
Publications
Notes
References
Further reading
External links RamasSquirrel ( talk) 09:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)