This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jaanwar page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our colleague Paglakahinka ( talk) 22:08, said 4 May 2011 (UTC) at my talk page
and i realized (just in time to avoid saving a version of this response there!) that the discussion belongs on this talk page (which perhaps will become the talk page of a sort-of-new Dab at
Jaanwar).
My prior observation (that the '99 one had to be at the primary-topic title) had no logic but the others' red-link statuses at that time, and now carries no weight per se. Nevertheless, i've reverted, for the interim, their move of
Jaanwar to
Jaanwar (1999 film), since
(I've already made reference to the "Is there a primary topic?" section on the
Dab'n guidelines page. I'd suggest anyone new to Dab'n matters read the next section on that page -- "Disambiguation page or disambiguation links?" -- as well, and it's likely to be worth going back to the beginning of the page after doing so, and continuing until one has read sequentially all the way from there thru the section i named last.)
If we can conclude expeditiously that the '99 one is not only the most significant for our readers but the primary topic -- it would help to cite verifiable numbers in order to overcome the now relevant presumption that equal Dab'n is appropriate -- both the moves they contemplate should indeed be carried out (and i, or any admin, could do that).
Otherwise, i recommend -- at the risk of being over-scrupulous, and even tho it'll need {{
Disambig-CU}} -- that the deleted, "Create dis page"-summarized, revision of
Jaanwar (as of 21 March 2008, at 09:12) by
Shshshsh be revived by undeletion (immediately after again moving the '99 film's article to
Jaanwar (1999 film)) to serve as the starting point of the newly needed Dab page. (If i'm not the one doing that, i recommend it be done by another admin for whom it would not be their first undeletion.)
--
Jerzy•
t 09:27 & 09:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
instead of making things complicated just create a disambiguition page so that who oever wants to know can know about the deatoils of the film they are looking for. but jaanwar 1983 is more popular by name of jaanwar 1982..so jaanwar can first refer to jaanwar 1983 film... Paglakahinka ( talk) 14:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
as far as jaanwar is concerned , it can be observed that 1965 flick if spelled as Janwar and the other two are named as Jaanwar. so the best solution is creating dismabiguition page as it would allow viwers to see all the three films in same page and they can get to know about the film they are searching for. als o chronologically jaanwar 1982 comes first so jaanwar title should belong to the 1983 flick and jaanawr 1999 should be named as jaanwar 1999 film. Paglakahinka ( talk) 16:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
No consensus to move and replace a dab page. Vegaswikian ( talk) 02:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Jaanwar (1999 film) → Jaanwar – Requested by Paglakahinka ( talk) on 16:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC) at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves#jaanwar. No rationale provided. Properly requested by Themeparkgc Talk 09:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
In well-intended moves, this talk page has been shuffled around a bit, and at least once improperly moved or left behind. It concerns the Dab page, not a single film, and i am reuniting it with the Dab page.
--
Jerzy•
t
17:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Janwar Aur Insaan and
the reference that supports it offer no reason to believe that
users would reasonably seek it at
Jaanwar, so the entry belongs in the "See also" section (if not removed) pending adequate reasons otherwise.
--
Jerzy•
t
19:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jaanwar page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our colleague Paglakahinka ( talk) 22:08, said 4 May 2011 (UTC) at my talk page
and i realized (just in time to avoid saving a version of this response there!) that the discussion belongs on this talk page (which perhaps will become the talk page of a sort-of-new Dab at
Jaanwar).
My prior observation (that the '99 one had to be at the primary-topic title) had no logic but the others' red-link statuses at that time, and now carries no weight per se. Nevertheless, i've reverted, for the interim, their move of
Jaanwar to
Jaanwar (1999 film), since
(I've already made reference to the "Is there a primary topic?" section on the
Dab'n guidelines page. I'd suggest anyone new to Dab'n matters read the next section on that page -- "Disambiguation page or disambiguation links?" -- as well, and it's likely to be worth going back to the beginning of the page after doing so, and continuing until one has read sequentially all the way from there thru the section i named last.)
If we can conclude expeditiously that the '99 one is not only the most significant for our readers but the primary topic -- it would help to cite verifiable numbers in order to overcome the now relevant presumption that equal Dab'n is appropriate -- both the moves they contemplate should indeed be carried out (and i, or any admin, could do that).
Otherwise, i recommend -- at the risk of being over-scrupulous, and even tho it'll need {{
Disambig-CU}} -- that the deleted, "Create dis page"-summarized, revision of
Jaanwar (as of 21 March 2008, at 09:12) by
Shshshsh be revived by undeletion (immediately after again moving the '99 film's article to
Jaanwar (1999 film)) to serve as the starting point of the newly needed Dab page. (If i'm not the one doing that, i recommend it be done by another admin for whom it would not be their first undeletion.)
--
Jerzy•
t 09:27 & 09:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
instead of making things complicated just create a disambiguition page so that who oever wants to know can know about the deatoils of the film they are looking for. but jaanwar 1983 is more popular by name of jaanwar 1982..so jaanwar can first refer to jaanwar 1983 film... Paglakahinka ( talk) 14:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
as far as jaanwar is concerned , it can be observed that 1965 flick if spelled as Janwar and the other two are named as Jaanwar. so the best solution is creating dismabiguition page as it would allow viwers to see all the three films in same page and they can get to know about the film they are searching for. als o chronologically jaanwar 1982 comes first so jaanwar title should belong to the 1983 flick and jaanawr 1999 should be named as jaanwar 1999 film. Paglakahinka ( talk) 16:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
No consensus to move and replace a dab page. Vegaswikian ( talk) 02:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Jaanwar (1999 film) → Jaanwar – Requested by Paglakahinka ( talk) on 16:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC) at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves#jaanwar. No rationale provided. Properly requested by Themeparkgc Talk 09:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
In well-intended moves, this talk page has been shuffled around a bit, and at least once improperly moved or left behind. It concerns the Dab page, not a single film, and i am reuniting it with the Dab page.
--
Jerzy•
t
17:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Janwar Aur Insaan and
the reference that supports it offer no reason to believe that
users would reasonably seek it at
Jaanwar, so the entry belongs in the "See also" section (if not removed) pending adequate reasons otherwise.
--
Jerzy•
t
19:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)