 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even if your assertion were true re Japanese rock music being more notable we still need the dab page to help our readers whio want to find the artist; we dont bury information because some editor claims it is less notable (without even a source to back up their assertion but even if its true it doesnt justify removing the dab page). Essentially you are arguing that if 9 out of 10 people want Japanse rock then a;ll 10 should get Japanese rock and the tenth person should be left without the info they want. But this is an encyclopedia, we arent here jsut to serve the majority (always assuming the assertion that the majority want Japoanese rock music is correct). The point of dabpages os to give the alternatives when they exist, as thye clearly do in this case. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 11:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Big Brovaz can be a hatnote. I don't have a problem with that. But Rock music in Japan is clearly the main topic here. The "we aren't here to serve the majority" argument doesn't actually hold much water in regards to disam pages. Disam pages are not exhaustive directories. If 99% of people are looking for one topic when typing into a search box, the link should go to that article. In this case, there are currently 81 direct links to this page. Every single one is for J-Rock the music style. For now I will fix the links to this page that should be going to J-Rock the musical style. I really don't feel like a fight over this. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 07:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe it's fair to include a small infobox to this article with resumed information that can be seen at a glance just like the Infoboxes used on other articles like visual kei, Group Sounds and J-pop. In a side note I don't understand how Japanese pop is seen as a musical genre within Japanese music whereas Japanese rock is not...(?) User:Takacchin10_10 ( talk)
- The basis of this article should be the similar American rock and British rock articles and all the others in Category:Rock music by nationality, which are not genres. Visual kei, Group Sounds and J-pop are not genres either. J-pop is introduced as a genre in its first sentence but the next section gives several definitions that contradict this; "the term J-pop was used only for Western-style musicians in Japan", "defined J-pop as all Japanese music belonging to the Recording Industry Association of Japan" and "In the 1990s, the term J-pop came to refer to all Japanese popular songs except enka." Ultimately, it is only an organizational category used by record stores, which is another of the definitions given in the article. But just because those three articles are incorrect doesn't mean this one should follow. 04:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on J-rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160824115812/http://www.vibe-net.com/musicinfo/topics/ss2008/interview.html to http://www.vibe-net.com/musicinfo/topics/ss2008/interview.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Japanese rock which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 08:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even if your assertion were true re Japanese rock music being more notable we still need the dab page to help our readers whio want to find the artist; we dont bury information because some editor claims it is less notable (without even a source to back up their assertion but even if its true it doesnt justify removing the dab page). Essentially you are arguing that if 9 out of 10 people want Japanse rock then a;ll 10 should get Japanese rock and the tenth person should be left without the info they want. But this is an encyclopedia, we arent here jsut to serve the majority (always assuming the assertion that the majority want Japoanese rock music is correct). The point of dabpages os to give the alternatives when they exist, as thye clearly do in this case. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 11:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Big Brovaz can be a hatnote. I don't have a problem with that. But Rock music in Japan is clearly the main topic here. The "we aren't here to serve the majority" argument doesn't actually hold much water in regards to disam pages. Disam pages are not exhaustive directories. If 99% of people are looking for one topic when typing into a search box, the link should go to that article. In this case, there are currently 81 direct links to this page. Every single one is for J-Rock the music style. For now I will fix the links to this page that should be going to J-Rock the musical style. I really don't feel like a fight over this. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 07:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe it's fair to include a small infobox to this article with resumed information that can be seen at a glance just like the Infoboxes used on other articles like visual kei, Group Sounds and J-pop. In a side note I don't understand how Japanese pop is seen as a musical genre within Japanese music whereas Japanese rock is not...(?) User:Takacchin10_10 ( talk)
- The basis of this article should be the similar American rock and British rock articles and all the others in Category:Rock music by nationality, which are not genres. Visual kei, Group Sounds and J-pop are not genres either. J-pop is introduced as a genre in its first sentence but the next section gives several definitions that contradict this; "the term J-pop was used only for Western-style musicians in Japan", "defined J-pop as all Japanese music belonging to the Recording Industry Association of Japan" and "In the 1990s, the term J-pop came to refer to all Japanese popular songs except enka." Ultimately, it is only an organizational category used by record stores, which is another of the definitions given in the article. But just because those three articles are incorrect doesn't mean this one should follow. 04:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on J-rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160824115812/http://www.vibe-net.com/musicinfo/topics/ss2008/interview.html to http://www.vibe-net.com/musicinfo/topics/ss2008/interview.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Japanese rock which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 08:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)