This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2020. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Turkey Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Iran Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries: Ottoman Empire This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles This redirect is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Mid-importance). Military history: Technology / Asian / Indian / Ottoman / South Asia / Early Muslim / Early Modern This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Asian military history task force Indian military history task force Ottoman military history task force South Asian military history task force Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600) Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) History Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mccapra Hello. This is actually a long story. This was taken from here. The article here on wikipedia existed earlier than 2016. It was the users of egypt search forums who copied and pasted. I've just created this article which highlights only about the Muslim Gunpowders, the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughals specifically. Thank you.-- Kapokbirdnotflying ( talk) 17:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

To avoid this happening in the future, please attribute when you copy from other wikipedia pages. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Moneytrees🌴 ^{Talk🌲 Help out at CCI!} 17:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Moneytrees: @ Kapokbirdnotflying: I don’t think this is right. There are several paragraphs in this article which are identical to several paras on the forum page I provided a link to. Those paras in turn are sourced on the forum page to a book. So it appears to me that both the article and the forum are copied from the same source. Mccapra ( talk) 18:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Mccapra where? If this is the case then I will removed anything copied or put in our own words. Oh, i can Note that the WP:LINKS can be found across those paragraphs, so looks it wasn't copied. From which source do you think it is copied?-- Kapokbirdnotflying ( talk) 19:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi it was in the link I provided in the speedy deletion notice: [1] but on rereading it I think I misunderstood it and you’re right. The reference to the book is to the item above the one that matches the article. Mccapra ( talk) 20:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Kapokbirdnotflying: I think the article should be moved to "Age of the Islamic gunpowder empires" or just "Islamic gunpowder empires", what do you think? Your sources include Douglas E. Streusand's "Islamic Gunpowder Empires", whereas my (quick) search for books referring to "Islamic gunpowders" didn't find anything relevant. TSventon ( talk) 04:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

For a while, we had the article Gunpowder empires, which based on its name, one might assume is about any empires associated with gunpowder. Instead, the article was about the early modern Islamic empires that utilized gunpowder, with a couple of randomly-selected other empires added in by editors confused about the title. It was a mess of an article, and recently gutted down to what is little more than a dictionary def, with now little potential to become anything more.

Now we have this article, Age of the Islamic Gunpowders, which based on its name, one might assume is about an age that featured various gunpowder formulas that were Islamic, which is apparently a proper noun since it's capitalized. Instead, the article was about the early modern Islamic empires that utilized gunpowder, just as the previous article started out until editors confused by the poor title filled it with random stuff.

Both articles cover the same subject -- the Islamic gunpowder empires. Note that, AFAIK, this is not a proper noun according to sources, so should not be capitalized.

So, I think this article should be renamed Islamic gunpowder empires to properly identify the subject, and what's left of Gunpowder empires should be merged into this and made a redirect. -- A D Monroe III^{( talk)} 21:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ A D Monroe III: as you are probably aware Kapokbirdnotflying created this article by copying deleted text from Gunpowder empires after Gun Powder Ma had nominated "Gunpowder empires" for stubification at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunpowder empires and then stubified the article in line with the (limited) discussion. I hope it will be possible for the editors involved to reach a consensus and resolve the WP:CONTENTFORK. If one article is kept it should be "Gunpowder empires" as that is where most of the content came from. TSventon ( talk) 00:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

This specific discussion is about the article title, whatever contents the article may have. When saying If one article is kept it should be "Gunpowder empires", I think this refers to the content, not the article title, right? That's a different (and completely valid) discussion. -- A D Monroe III^{( talk)} 00:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ A D Monroe III: I think the content issue needs to be resolved before the name issue, if only by silent acceptance of the current situation. My If one article is kept it should be "Gunpowder empires" was a response to your what's left of Gunpowder empires should be merged into this and made a redirect. TSventon ( talk) 11:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

TSventon Hello, sorry for the delay. Yes I think it is more appropriate to keep both of them (separately). There is no need to merge it. This article is about the age of the Muslim empires and part of the Islamic history, where as the other is about the term Gunpowder in general used by some authors. Now it has been nominated for deletion. Thanks-- Kapokbirdnotflying ( talk) 14:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Kapokbirdnotflying: I think the subject is notable but the article celebrates the empires, rather than taking the neutral popint of view needed for wikipedia. In a similar situation, I would recommend starting a discussion rather than starting a new article with deleted material. TSventon ( talk) 22:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

(Back to the subject of this discussion, the title, not the content.

I see that this article's title has been changed during the discussion, to something not following the consensus. Sigh. The current title is now Islamic Gunpowder empires, arguably the least sensible title so far. Capitalizing the "G" makes zero sense; if the title were a proper noun, all three words would be capitalized, and if not then only the first word would be capitalized. What reason can there be for capitalizing half-way between these? Again, the last suggestion was Islamic gunpowder empires. -- A D Monroe III^{( talk)} 21:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ A D Monroe III: True, but the article is now nominated for deletion, so I am reluctant to rename it a third time until the discussion is resolved. TSventon ( talk) 00:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

@ TSventon: hi you haven't voted yet?-- Kapokbirdnotflying ( talk) 14:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Kapokbirdnotflying: Done, although it is outside my normal areas of interest, I only noticed the article because it was on a list of new architecture related articles. TSventon ( talk) 23:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply