The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout etc.
Verifiable
it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
all inline citations are from reliable sources;
it contains no original research; and
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated
images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Review
This is a well-written article with 95.4% written by a single user (
HistoryofIran). The article is stable, broad in coverage and structured with clear paragraphs and subsections.
Text in the last paragraph is identical to text in
Kayumarth I. One is a copy or there is a remarkable coincidence. Please correct.
The Yavari reference has no page numbers. I suggest finding the reference in the printed volume if possible as this would be consistent with the other references.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout etc.
Verifiable
it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
all inline citations are from reliable sources;
it contains no original research; and
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated
images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Review
This is a well-written article with 95.4% written by a single user (
HistoryofIran). The article is stable, broad in coverage and structured with clear paragraphs and subsections.
Text in the last paragraph is identical to text in
Kayumarth I. One is a copy or there is a remarkable coincidence. Please correct.
The Yavari reference has no page numbers. I suggest finding the reference in the printed volume if possible as this would be consistent with the other references.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.