This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Iron Man (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Iron Man" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Shouldn't be made more larger. I mean you don't see Spider-Man 3 the game article being a stub do you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.213.146 ( talk) 08:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Once again the Wii gets the shaft in crossplatform games. At least it's INCLUDED this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 ( talk) 14:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Irongame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
will this game have free-roaming?-- Lbrun12415 20:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
It's almost comical at how poorly written this article is. "Sega has purchased rights from Activision for the game and it has developed it." "You can also upgrade the iron man suit by doing missions and getting money to buy the upgrade." "TeamXbox gave a turd" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.46.236 ( talk) 09:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
http://www.marvel.com/news/videogames.2957.Iron_Man%7Eand%7EHulk_Games_Hit_Spike_TV
Since the game is released for PC, are we going to add system requirements somewhere? I'm still new here, so I don't exactly know how adding that kind of thing works... -- Blanurozgu ( talk) 22:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm the guy who have added the plot, characters and bonus features sections. But all the content I added is from the PS2 version, and I noticed that the next-gen versions have some different content. If someone here have one of this versions, please add more content and correct me if I did something wrong ('cause I'm Brazilian and my Englih is not so good). I think this game is good and it deserves a good article. Iron Man Gamer 00:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I reverted the armor section back to describing all the armors you can unlock because I think it is an interesting topic to have and because this article needs more information. PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 02:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Possibly the dumbest argument I have ever heard. Are all wikipedia users fags or just you? The Wikipedia is not a gameguide retardedness doesn't even apply here. It's not telling you how to unlock the armors, just what they are. Or should we delete the characters and stories too? THOSE ARE IN GAME GUIDES!!! Fucking moron. Well, look at it now. Now it should be fine with you, right, fucking faggot? PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 12:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't care. Unless you remove the entire bonus features portion of the article, the armor information is related to the article. PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 18:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I saw a Youtube review that basically says that the PS2/PSP/Wii/PC version is different both in graphics and in gameplay from the Xbox 360/PS3 version. Is this true? Is the gameplay different? Devil Master ( talk) 17:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, they are different but don't prefer the Xbox 360 and PS3 version because they are worst than the other versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.121.248 ( talk) 15:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Despite being generally considered one of the worst (if not the worst) out of the lot (my pov from reading reviews), the PC version is not mentioned at all in the critical reception section. This is somewhat of an oversight given that the article should be comprehensive. I reverted an earlier mention from the official SEGA forum for this product on the PC version's complaints (where else will fans officially complain that can be referenced?) and added an expandsection for PC reviews. Seemingly TPTB think that we don't need this as a PC starting point (fair enough, the refs were contentious), but to not need any further expansion in this section is frankly as appalling as the game is!
Brownb2 ( talk) 00:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
ALL versions were basically panned, and for the same reasons. There really doesn't need to be seperate paragraphs for different versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.249.135.131 ( talk) 22:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Primarily leaving a talk entry so I remember to come back and fix this later because this has to be one of the worst non-stub Wikipedia articles I've seen in some time. Kac Calhoon ( talk) 17:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Iron Man (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Iron Man" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't be made more larger. I mean you don't see Spider-Man 3 the game article being a stub do you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.213.146 ( talk) 08:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Once again the Wii gets the shaft in crossplatform games. At least it's INCLUDED this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 ( talk) 14:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Irongame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
will this game have free-roaming?-- Lbrun12415 20:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
It's almost comical at how poorly written this article is. "Sega has purchased rights from Activision for the game and it has developed it." "You can also upgrade the iron man suit by doing missions and getting money to buy the upgrade." "TeamXbox gave a turd" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.46.236 ( talk) 09:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
http://www.marvel.com/news/videogames.2957.Iron_Man%7Eand%7EHulk_Games_Hit_Spike_TV
Since the game is released for PC, are we going to add system requirements somewhere? I'm still new here, so I don't exactly know how adding that kind of thing works... -- Blanurozgu ( talk) 22:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm the guy who have added the plot, characters and bonus features sections. But all the content I added is from the PS2 version, and I noticed that the next-gen versions have some different content. If someone here have one of this versions, please add more content and correct me if I did something wrong ('cause I'm Brazilian and my Englih is not so good). I think this game is good and it deserves a good article. Iron Man Gamer 00:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I reverted the armor section back to describing all the armors you can unlock because I think it is an interesting topic to have and because this article needs more information. PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 02:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Possibly the dumbest argument I have ever heard. Are all wikipedia users fags or just you? The Wikipedia is not a gameguide retardedness doesn't even apply here. It's not telling you how to unlock the armors, just what they are. Or should we delete the characters and stories too? THOSE ARE IN GAME GUIDES!!! Fucking moron. Well, look at it now. Now it should be fine with you, right, fucking faggot? PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 12:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't care. Unless you remove the entire bonus features portion of the article, the armor information is related to the article. PlayFreebirdNow ( talk) 18:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I saw a Youtube review that basically says that the PS2/PSP/Wii/PC version is different both in graphics and in gameplay from the Xbox 360/PS3 version. Is this true? Is the gameplay different? Devil Master ( talk) 17:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, they are different but don't prefer the Xbox 360 and PS3 version because they are worst than the other versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.121.248 ( talk) 15:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Despite being generally considered one of the worst (if not the worst) out of the lot (my pov from reading reviews), the PC version is not mentioned at all in the critical reception section. This is somewhat of an oversight given that the article should be comprehensive. I reverted an earlier mention from the official SEGA forum for this product on the PC version's complaints (where else will fans officially complain that can be referenced?) and added an expandsection for PC reviews. Seemingly TPTB think that we don't need this as a PC starting point (fair enough, the refs were contentious), but to not need any further expansion in this section is frankly as appalling as the game is!
Brownb2 ( talk) 00:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
ALL versions were basically panned, and for the same reasons. There really doesn't need to be seperate paragraphs for different versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.249.135.131 ( talk) 22:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Primarily leaving a talk entry so I remember to come back and fix this later because this has to be one of the worst non-stub Wikipedia articles I've seen in some time. Kac Calhoon ( talk) 17:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)