![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
I was about to remove "Note that while the common Spanish name is spelled " Íñigo", the name in the book is consistently spelled "Inigo".", it seems to me completely unimportant info about a fictional character. Then I saw the note and the archived discussion, and I don´t want restart a lengthy conflict about spelling. How do editors feel about this today, is it ok to remove it? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 16:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
References
I have deleted this box because the only complaints I could see were (i) that all citations come from a single source - which is hardly suprising in the case of fictional character: there is one definitive source: the novel! and (ii) lack of verification or sources. Since there is one definititive source for all information about this character, surely only one citation or verification is required. ElectricRay ( talk) 08:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I could have sworn the novel ended with Westley taking the wounded Inigo to a skilled surgeon and then a flash forward to the four main characters, all healthy, hiding out on an island. Lots42 ( talk) 02:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Costume photo, sure looks like Indigo. 23.25.198.145 ( talk) 17:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I don’t see a reason for this article’s existence. Most of the information provided is already in the main film article and whatever others could be moved to said article, ie the picture of the costume. There’s no reception provided or many credible sources that would merit a full article for what is essentially a selective summary of the film/book. Sandwich 20:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
I was about to remove "Note that while the common Spanish name is spelled " Íñigo", the name in the book is consistently spelled "Inigo".", it seems to me completely unimportant info about a fictional character. Then I saw the note and the archived discussion, and I don´t want restart a lengthy conflict about spelling. How do editors feel about this today, is it ok to remove it? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 16:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
References
I have deleted this box because the only complaints I could see were (i) that all citations come from a single source - which is hardly suprising in the case of fictional character: there is one definitive source: the novel! and (ii) lack of verification or sources. Since there is one definititive source for all information about this character, surely only one citation or verification is required. ElectricRay ( talk) 08:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I could have sworn the novel ended with Westley taking the wounded Inigo to a skilled surgeon and then a flash forward to the four main characters, all healthy, hiding out on an island. Lots42 ( talk) 02:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Costume photo, sure looks like Indigo. 23.25.198.145 ( talk) 17:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I don’t see a reason for this article’s existence. Most of the information provided is already in the main film article and whatever others could be moved to said article, ie the picture of the costume. There’s no reception provided or many credible sources that would merit a full article for what is essentially a selective summary of the film/book. Sandwich 20:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)