This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indo-Persian culture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in Persianization. |
A summary of this article appears in Persianate society. |
This has the feel of a PoV fork; could anyone familiar with the area confirm this or rule it out? -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 09:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Why in the heck is there a huge section on P N Oak who is on the extreme fringe of historical writing and only distantly related to this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.14.73 ( talk) 16:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I have removed all such references to P N Oak's work as it is pseudohistorical and has no veracity, now the article should read better without the section.
Azeem Ali ( talk) 23:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
reaming this to "Indo-Persian literature" and changing the article to fit isn't something that should be done without a great deal of discussion — it involves a change, not merely to what's said, but to the subject of the article. Please propose the change here first. (Why not create a new article if you think that one is needed?) -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 13:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Indo-Persian culture shouled be changed to Indo-Iranic culture (not Iranian culture - Iranian culture is only a word for the iranic culture of various Iranic people of modern
Iran, mostly synonym for Persians of Iran) since most people still belive modernday Iran was old Persia, falsefully. Persia was a very large area that streched from Anatolia and the Balkan region to NW-India. The Persian culture that came to India had it´s root in central Asia, in the ancient country that once was called (Greater)
Khorasan(modern Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan...). The description self is wrong. Iranic people have Iranic culture and have not adoptet Iranian´s culture. From the age of the avestan periode till today most Iranic people have still the same culture and language, particularely the Persians and their sub-groups (Tajiks, Talish people, Tats). Non-Persians but Iranic people like Kurds or Balochs haven´t the same language but the same culture and that is why I ask you to change the title to Indo-Iranic culture because Indian muslims in northern and central India and Pakistanis along with various modern Turkic states in central Asia and beyong share the same culture with the Iranic (Indo-European) population of central Asia, Iran and Iraq.
-- Draco of Utopia ( talk) 11:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Indo-Persian culture was at its strongest in the Hyderabad of the Nizams but the article does not even mention a passing mention. - Ravi My Tea Kadai 03:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This article reads like a personal reflection and essay. It needs citations. The citations given are poor quality and do not support the content at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.188.203 ( talk) 12:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
This arcticle has few major problems:
I want to see a BALANCED article, not the nationalistic biased leaning of people trying to impose certain slant on the culture. Please help me improve with more references and BALANCED BIDIRECTIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE views.
Being.human (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
08:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC) <--- blocked
sock of
User:Vdhillon
I think this article focuses too heavily on language (although it does talk about architecture sometimes, and there is a mention of music). There is a separate page on language called "Persian language in the Indian subcontinent) which I'm working on expanding. Since this is a page about culture, I think it would do better to diversify and pay attention to things that aren't language as well. A lot of these things have their own articles. To start I've added sections on food and architecture, and linked them to the main articles, and I hope these can be improved by other users.
I'm also not sure what to do about the history bit. It traces the history of Indo persian culture well but in doing so clumps together topics that could have their own section. Might be something to look into. Gowhk8 ( talk) 02:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
There is no mention Or sources stating that vijayanagara was persianized. Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa ( talk) 14:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
For the most part, this only talks about the Islamic era Persian influences, but Persian influence in India starts as early as the Achaemenid rule of Gandhara. Shouldn't that be talked about here? Himeaimichu ( talk) 12:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indo-Persian culture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in Persianization. |
A summary of this article appears in Persianate society. |
This has the feel of a PoV fork; could anyone familiar with the area confirm this or rule it out? -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 09:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Why in the heck is there a huge section on P N Oak who is on the extreme fringe of historical writing and only distantly related to this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.14.73 ( talk) 16:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I have removed all such references to P N Oak's work as it is pseudohistorical and has no veracity, now the article should read better without the section.
Azeem Ali ( talk) 23:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
reaming this to "Indo-Persian literature" and changing the article to fit isn't something that should be done without a great deal of discussion — it involves a change, not merely to what's said, but to the subject of the article. Please propose the change here first. (Why not create a new article if you think that one is needed?) -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 13:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Indo-Persian culture shouled be changed to Indo-Iranic culture (not Iranian culture - Iranian culture is only a word for the iranic culture of various Iranic people of modern
Iran, mostly synonym for Persians of Iran) since most people still belive modernday Iran was old Persia, falsefully. Persia was a very large area that streched from Anatolia and the Balkan region to NW-India. The Persian culture that came to India had it´s root in central Asia, in the ancient country that once was called (Greater)
Khorasan(modern Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan...). The description self is wrong. Iranic people have Iranic culture and have not adoptet Iranian´s culture. From the age of the avestan periode till today most Iranic people have still the same culture and language, particularely the Persians and their sub-groups (Tajiks, Talish people, Tats). Non-Persians but Iranic people like Kurds or Balochs haven´t the same language but the same culture and that is why I ask you to change the title to Indo-Iranic culture because Indian muslims in northern and central India and Pakistanis along with various modern Turkic states in central Asia and beyong share the same culture with the Iranic (Indo-European) population of central Asia, Iran and Iraq.
-- Draco of Utopia ( talk) 11:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Indo-Persian culture was at its strongest in the Hyderabad of the Nizams but the article does not even mention a passing mention. - Ravi My Tea Kadai 03:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This article reads like a personal reflection and essay. It needs citations. The citations given are poor quality and do not support the content at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.188.203 ( talk) 12:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
This arcticle has few major problems:
I want to see a BALANCED article, not the nationalistic biased leaning of people trying to impose certain slant on the culture. Please help me improve with more references and BALANCED BIDIRECTIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE views.
Being.human (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
08:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC) <--- blocked
sock of
User:Vdhillon
I think this article focuses too heavily on language (although it does talk about architecture sometimes, and there is a mention of music). There is a separate page on language called "Persian language in the Indian subcontinent) which I'm working on expanding. Since this is a page about culture, I think it would do better to diversify and pay attention to things that aren't language as well. A lot of these things have their own articles. To start I've added sections on food and architecture, and linked them to the main articles, and I hope these can be improved by other users.
I'm also not sure what to do about the history bit. It traces the history of Indo persian culture well but in doing so clumps together topics that could have their own section. Might be something to look into. Gowhk8 ( talk) 02:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
There is no mention Or sources stating that vijayanagara was persianized. Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa ( talk) 14:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
For the most part, this only talks about the Islamic era Persian influences, but Persian influence in India starts as early as the Achaemenid rule of Gandhara. Shouldn't that be talked about here? Himeaimichu ( talk) 12:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)