Hydnum repandum is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 24, 2019. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 23, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
sweet tooth mushroom is sometimes bitter? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Good topic for a GA. Review to follow soon. J Milburn ( talk) 15:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
You cite some pretty obscure looking sources, but all seem appropriate. Generally a strong article- while it's pretty much a GA now, there are other bits which will need to be done for FAC. I'll have a delve into some of my books and see if there's anything good there. (I gave my dad a great book on edibles for Christmas a few years ago, which will definitely cover this one. Sadly, I won't have access to that for a few months!) J Milburn ( talk) 16:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Check |isbn=
value: length (
help); Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors=
(
help) Notes that it is similar to Theleforaceae species, but that they generally have a "tough leathery texture". Also similar to H. rufescens, but that "is smaller, with a deeper apricot or orange colour". Notes that it grows on soil or leaf litter.More to come; hopefully some will be useful. J Milburn ( talk) 16:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, looks like this is progressing well- a little further expansion before FAC seems to be possible, but, for now, this makes a solid GA. I'm now happy to promote, but, as a note, Courtecuisse doesn't mention that that older specimens are bitter, just that those growing under conifers are poor tasting. J Milburn ( talk) 10:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I corrected the amino acid profile, based on the reference but this was reverted with no comment by Sasata who disliked the "bulky table" and then reintroduced one of my corrections partially, and in his own format.
The table makes it easier to see the values for each amino acid. In contrast, separating them with a mixture of commas and semicolons is harder to read making it easier for errors to go overlooked.
But when dealing with data, it is very important to get the correct numbers. Read the actual study tables; don't just delete the corrections I made and revert to the old, wrong values. Do we really need an edit war here? I think you should undo your last commit and instead bring the issue on this talk page. Thank you. Xkit ( talk) 21:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC) Comment moved from Talk:Hydnum repandum/GA1. Josh Milburn ( talk) 22:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
The author initials in the references are not treated consistently as they should be in an FA. Spicemix ( talk) 09:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I have reinstated the content which states this fungus is found in North and Central America. The following sources all state that this fungus is commonly found in North America.
References
Hydnum repandum does not occur in North America. Of the four references above which say that it does, all rely on outdated information. The first is current as of 2016, and cites the following evidence that Hydnum repandum occurs in North America: "However, evidence from root tips of Pinus muricata (Fig. 1, GU180269) indicated that H. repandum occurs in western North America."
Niskanen et. al. 2018 ( https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00275514.2018.1477004) published this species as Hydnum neorepandum, citing GU180269 as one of the studied sequences. This paper also designated an epitype for Hydnum repandum, NR_164553. This sequence does not match GU180269.
The species referenced by GU180269 is now known as Hydnum washingtonianum, per http://mathenylab.utk.edu/Site/Publications_files/Swenie_Hydnum_easternNA_taxonomy.2018.pdf.
Regarding the distribution of the real H. repandum, the most recent and reliable source, Niskanen 2018 says "Ecology and distribution: In Picea abies–dominated forests mixed with Betula, Pinus, Populus, Corylus, and/ or Quercus. Also in Abies and Fagus forests. Producing basidiomata late summer to late autumn. Europe. One sequence (JQ063050) from an ectomycorrhizal root tip of Pakaraimaea dipterocarpacea in Venezuela deposited in GenBank requires further confirmation given its extralimital distribution and host plant data."
The phylogenetic tree on page 4 of Niskanen 2018 shows the true distribution of Hydnum repandum.
All available DNA evidence in Genbank agrees with Nisnanen's 2018 conclusions about the distribution of Hydnum repandum.
See also https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30215579/
Alan Rockefeller ( Talk - contribs) 06:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hydnum repandum is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 24, 2019. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 23, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
sweet tooth mushroom is sometimes bitter? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Good topic for a GA. Review to follow soon. J Milburn ( talk) 15:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
You cite some pretty obscure looking sources, but all seem appropriate. Generally a strong article- while it's pretty much a GA now, there are other bits which will need to be done for FAC. I'll have a delve into some of my books and see if there's anything good there. (I gave my dad a great book on edibles for Christmas a few years ago, which will definitely cover this one. Sadly, I won't have access to that for a few months!) J Milburn ( talk) 16:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Check |isbn=
value: length (
help); Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors=
(
help) Notes that it is similar to Theleforaceae species, but that they generally have a "tough leathery texture". Also similar to H. rufescens, but that "is smaller, with a deeper apricot or orange colour". Notes that it grows on soil or leaf litter.More to come; hopefully some will be useful. J Milburn ( talk) 16:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, looks like this is progressing well- a little further expansion before FAC seems to be possible, but, for now, this makes a solid GA. I'm now happy to promote, but, as a note, Courtecuisse doesn't mention that that older specimens are bitter, just that those growing under conifers are poor tasting. J Milburn ( talk) 10:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I corrected the amino acid profile, based on the reference but this was reverted with no comment by Sasata who disliked the "bulky table" and then reintroduced one of my corrections partially, and in his own format.
The table makes it easier to see the values for each amino acid. In contrast, separating them with a mixture of commas and semicolons is harder to read making it easier for errors to go overlooked.
But when dealing with data, it is very important to get the correct numbers. Read the actual study tables; don't just delete the corrections I made and revert to the old, wrong values. Do we really need an edit war here? I think you should undo your last commit and instead bring the issue on this talk page. Thank you. Xkit ( talk) 21:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC) Comment moved from Talk:Hydnum repandum/GA1. Josh Milburn ( talk) 22:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
The author initials in the references are not treated consistently as they should be in an FA. Spicemix ( talk) 09:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I have reinstated the content which states this fungus is found in North and Central America. The following sources all state that this fungus is commonly found in North America.
References
Hydnum repandum does not occur in North America. Of the four references above which say that it does, all rely on outdated information. The first is current as of 2016, and cites the following evidence that Hydnum repandum occurs in North America: "However, evidence from root tips of Pinus muricata (Fig. 1, GU180269) indicated that H. repandum occurs in western North America."
Niskanen et. al. 2018 ( https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00275514.2018.1477004) published this species as Hydnum neorepandum, citing GU180269 as one of the studied sequences. This paper also designated an epitype for Hydnum repandum, NR_164553. This sequence does not match GU180269.
The species referenced by GU180269 is now known as Hydnum washingtonianum, per http://mathenylab.utk.edu/Site/Publications_files/Swenie_Hydnum_easternNA_taxonomy.2018.pdf.
Regarding the distribution of the real H. repandum, the most recent and reliable source, Niskanen 2018 says "Ecology and distribution: In Picea abies–dominated forests mixed with Betula, Pinus, Populus, Corylus, and/ or Quercus. Also in Abies and Fagus forests. Producing basidiomata late summer to late autumn. Europe. One sequence (JQ063050) from an ectomycorrhizal root tip of Pakaraimaea dipterocarpacea in Venezuela deposited in GenBank requires further confirmation given its extralimital distribution and host plant data."
The phylogenetic tree on page 4 of Niskanen 2018 shows the true distribution of Hydnum repandum.
All available DNA evidence in Genbank agrees with Nisnanen's 2018 conclusions about the distribution of Hydnum repandum.
See also https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30215579/
Alan Rockefeller ( Talk - contribs) 06:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)