![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This Says Category 1 Hurricane Eta, It is not a tropical storm! Winds are at 90 not at 70. Hurricanestudier123 ( talk) 13:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
@ FleurDeOdile: Are we not doing geostationary images for this storm? I mean, I don't care if we do or not, but since it was something that was consistently implemented, I was just wondering. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 01:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I just woke up, knowing that Eta had the potential to become a category 5. I haven't found any sources that mentioned it, so I was kind of wondering the source you found that mentioned it having hit that category. 47.219.203.95 ( talk) 13:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
There actually is much evidence to support that Hurricane Eta could’ve been a category 5, but I still think whoever upgraded it on the wiki is just probably a troll. MANORVOanonymous ( talk) 20:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
If Eta were to be hit as a Category 5 hurricane before making landfall in Nicaragua, I'd be sure it would re-analyze it in the first or second quarter of next year? (after removing the names of the 2019 and 2020 hurricane season by the WMO). -- МОДОКАУ 20:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Closed. Discussion should continue elsewhere |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
One of the primary things this site espouses is good faith. With that I'll ask C. Eric why the unilateralism? Who decides the list is too long, for example. Howdoesitgo1 ( talk) 22:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
What is meant by asking what do I mean? Some of the things you are editing are not factual; I suppose it's good to try to follow OR if you are doing so. You could be incorrect at times. Howdoesitgo1 ( talk) 23:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to accuse someone of something, please provide
evidence, or else it's a baseless claim and can be a violation of attacking other users. @
Howdoesitgo1: please stop accusing other users without evidence. And also, please stop your disruptive editing by adding unnecessary words ( a storm which was a likely tornado) and phrases on Hurricane Zeta. In addition, most of your edits were of poor grammar or reverting correct grammar to incorrect grammar ( in Acworth, Georgia, a→ in Acworth, Georgia aIt's getting disruptive. You can accuse other editors of disruptive editing, but please don't do it yourself. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 13:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
If I may say something: every edit I make on these hurricanes is based off (a)the NHC, (b)the NWS, or (c)trusted news organization. I'm not going to say all my edits are correct, but I follow the trends I saw off of other articles and THAT was what I was doing for Hurricane Zeta. The lead sentence during active storms from what I've seen talks about what the hurricane is doing followed by what it has done. That is why I changed to what I did. Also, landfall points can be up for debate and I'm pretty sure I meant to put near not in so I'm sorry about that. However, to say its a "questionable" edit on my part is VERY offensive to me when I had to put with the vandal that wanted to change a current hurricane threatening Louisiana to Cat 5 status for 20 STRAIGHT MINUTES. Think about that next time you want to criticize me please. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 01:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I thought this was closed. Move on please. The faith thing literally happened several days ago. If you want to continue the debate, fine with me. Just do it on either WP:DRN, User talk:Jason Rees, or WP:ANI. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 22:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC) |
The section about Panama rain damages is doubtful. Not only the Hurricane is too far but the article does not make any link. The article is just saying "Las condiciones inestables del tiempo se mantienen en los próximos días." (The unstable conditions will persist for the next few days).
Pierre cb ( talk) 17:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
@Pierre cb, @TornadoLGS , the only rainfall, in the area around the time the article was written was in association with Eta. Also the source says “the recent rains” which most likely refers to Eta. Note also that they sentence says “possibly” and infers that it’s possible to be associated with Eta, even likely. Robloxsupersuperhappyface ( talk) 03:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Someone needs to update it as it’s no longer a hurricane and is currently weakening — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.109.93 ( talk) 18:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
I was looking at the initial sentence for this article and the way it was written really didn't read well in my mind. I was going to change it to something that sounded better, though I was worried that the sentence might lose the pertinent information that, although it had a certain intensity mark, that it had weakened, though it was still a concern. I was thinking of changing it to "Hurricane Eta is a currently active tropical depression over Honduras that, before making landfall, became the second strongest November hurricane on record." I recognize this may become moot if someone changed to reflect a location or intensity change anyway, but I figured for the sake of setting a more readable stylistic standard for the first sentence it would be worth changing earlier. So what I'm asking is, is this sentence an okay substitute? I don't want to screw it up and confuse people who may be at risk from this storm. DarkSide830 ( talk) 23:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Does anybody have any information on preparations in Guatemala, impacts in El Salvador, or both for Mexico? Robloxsupersuperhappyface ( talk) 03:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
impacts will come out soon Meteorologist200 ( talk) 14:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Created by sockmaster. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
so I read the New York post article that the anonymous user posted and it seemed very relevant and interesting maybe we should look more into that subject Meteorologist200 ( talk) 14:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
@
Jasper Deng: Please don't point out grammar mistakes that are not on Eta's article here on this talk page. Yep, I capitalized "may" accidentally since I was editing on an Ipad mini at the time. @
TornadoLGS: The Washingtong Post did go with the NHC, put put there own speculations on Eta's intensity. Why not say that there was a lack of recon data and remove the speculation? ~ Destroyeraa
🌀
02:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
From USA TODAY (November 2) about Eta maybe becoming a Cat 5 –
Hurricane Eta gains historic strength, could reach Category 5 status when it hits Central America on Tuesday – "The hurricane center said Eta is expected to strengthen over the course of the next 12 hours and could possibly become a Category 5 storm of historic proportions." Cheers.
Drdpw (
talk)
11:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Listen, I didn't mean to make an argument. When I saw the article I saw it was from a known news source and that it was interesting. I wanted to share it here. I do understand that the NHC never let out an advisory on this so for now, we will just wait. Hurricane Michael was cat 4 at landfall but was upgraded. Same thing could happen so keep a look out on it. Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC) Continue to pray for those in Florida and Mexico. Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Also, the category 5 stuff is in meteorological history yet I thought you removed it? Meteorologist200 ( talk) 18:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng: It DID go through the northwestern eyewall. I tweeted about it. Besides, can't we just wait for the TCR? It was 7 mph short of Cat 5 intensity. If it was 155, I'd be fine. But 150? No. This was one source making a claim and I see absolutely no reason to mention. There are plenty of other storms that may have reached Cat 5 intensity (i.e. Joaquin), but we don't put in speculation unless its from the NHC because THAT it where the OFFICIAL AND FINAL call comes from. Also, don't give me that about trying to WIN an argument. I'm allowed to give my opinion and that is what I'm doing. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC) And one more thing to everyone out here. Short of editors getting in my case, this is like the third or fourth time that has criticized or attacked me when I'm just making opinion or edits in the past two weeks, which is really frustrating and annoying. This has been a long hurricane season and I understand that, but please, just take into consideration that we are here to have a discussion. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng: Okay. That was just disrespectful. Again, I'm entitled to my opinions and will not stand for personal attacks. I understand what your saying and I respected what you were saying, but YOU did not return the same kindness. I'm reporting this. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
anything new on it? Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
|
This article is getting LONG and there will definitely be articles needed for Eta's track and impacts in certain areas. Has anyone started this yet? ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 19:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
maybe after this dissipates we can decide Meteorologist200 ( talk) 20:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Okay, i know that we only have accurate records when Hurricane Eta wasn’t at its full peak, but I think it is important that we stress we actually have no idea how strong this incredibly devastating hurricane was. It is quite unlucky considering that from the satellite stand-point, it looked like this was an insanely strong category 5, but we never got to have the true wind speed due to none of the jets leaving and making it to Eta.... We had readings of winds from 175-(almost)200 mph when using different technologies, but we never sent out anything until after the monster storm started losing strength, meaning there is only the info we have back when it was still at 150 mph. MANORVOanonymous ( talk) 20:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Please don't forget about ReliefWeb when expanding the Aftermath section. It's an invaluable resource for relief efforts in every country. ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 20:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
I don't focus in the writing as much as I do in say, updating info or taking part in antivandalism. However, I was wanting to know about an article for either one. Particularly Honduras, because it caused $5 billion at least and killed 62 people. It was at least a tropical storm and likely a hurricane. -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 13:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa: I saw you changed the damage estimates on Honduras to 5 billion in Honduran currency to USD - I changed it back to 5 billion USD, as the article draws comparisons to Mitch and clarifies that it was more than Mitch in Honduras, which was 4 billion USD. I don't actually read Spanish past a very beginner level, so I've used google translate for this, so I can't quite confirm that's the intended meaning. YellowSkarmory ( talk) 20:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I heard on the news that Tropical Storm Eta would likely hit Central Florida as either a tropical storm or a Category 1 hurricane. Should we add some more predictions on Eta rising northeast? Also, the storm track at the section Hurricane Eta#Meteorological history needs to be updated. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 13:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
{{I hate that we have to do this again but someone (cough, @ FleurDeOdile:) still thinks it’s fine to revert and cause an edit war over a high quality image to a lower-grade image of Eta at peak.
Nonetheless here’s the two images:
I obviously prefer the first one as it is 1.) much more vibrant 2.) it’s a larger image size 3.) it is higher in quality and 4.) it is not overly saturated with regards to the landmass.
I really hope this can be resolved frankly because I do not want a Delta repeat again. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 18:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi:
Lately the number of missing persons has been added to 3 countries in the table. I am sure there is but I cannot find any mention or references supporting those in the rest of the text. Can somebody correct this?
Pierre cb ( talk) 00:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
I saw a report by them saying there has been a mudslide today with 10 deaths in Guatemala. I assume this is from Eta. I can't find the report, is anyone able to find it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.126.173 ( talk) 18:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Is it just me, or is that lead insane? Can we cut it down a bit? Thx, Gex4pls ( talk) 20:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm Nicaraguan. I'm writing you to inform that official resources are official resources. The SINAPRED, the prevention board of Nicaragua, stated that "No se registraron afectaciones en vidas humanas." Which means:There were no effects on human lives. So you are citing from Reuters but this news agency did not confirm the source from the official government, just for unofficial sources. Could you please correct this cite? Thanks.
Here is the official resources, you may add it. SINAPRED Regards.--🌀 Byralaal ( +505-chat-toMe) 00:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Can we make this page, I think it's notable Thingofme ( talk) 00:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa, ChessEric, I like hurricanes, SMB99thx, Hurricanehink, Cyclonebiskit, Hurricane Noah, and KN2731: I was thinking about it-should these areas also have subarticles like Honduras?
Over the weekend I'll be extremely busy with Draft: Effects of Hurricane Charley in Florida(feel free to help!), and won't have time to work on this. -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
No need for a sub-article at this point. There is only 26 kb of readable text. A lot of the article's length right now are the references. Please add to this article before makin a sub-article. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Should we had this image to the Meteorological History section? Or another section?
🌀 HurricaneGeek🌀 { talk} — Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Are there any images of Eta as a C1 in the Gulf? If there is, I think should be included in the article. 🌀 HurricaneGeek🌀 { talk} 16:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the source that lists 94 deaths in Honduras and 60 in Guatemala is a source that combines both storms into the same article talking about impacts. However, I'd like someone else to take a look at this, as I could be misunderstanding it. [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarmory ( talk • contribs) 02:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
This needs semi protection, i dont know how to send a request however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justcgi ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
There have only been a couple instances of vandalism in the past two weeks. Semi-protection isn't necessary right now. TornadoLGS ( talk) 21:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This Says Category 1 Hurricane Eta, It is not a tropical storm! Winds are at 90 not at 70. Hurricanestudier123 ( talk) 13:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
@ FleurDeOdile: Are we not doing geostationary images for this storm? I mean, I don't care if we do or not, but since it was something that was consistently implemented, I was just wondering. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 01:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I just woke up, knowing that Eta had the potential to become a category 5. I haven't found any sources that mentioned it, so I was kind of wondering the source you found that mentioned it having hit that category. 47.219.203.95 ( talk) 13:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
There actually is much evidence to support that Hurricane Eta could’ve been a category 5, but I still think whoever upgraded it on the wiki is just probably a troll. MANORVOanonymous ( talk) 20:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
If Eta were to be hit as a Category 5 hurricane before making landfall in Nicaragua, I'd be sure it would re-analyze it in the first or second quarter of next year? (after removing the names of the 2019 and 2020 hurricane season by the WMO). -- МОДОКАУ 20:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Closed. Discussion should continue elsewhere |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
One of the primary things this site espouses is good faith. With that I'll ask C. Eric why the unilateralism? Who decides the list is too long, for example. Howdoesitgo1 ( talk) 22:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
What is meant by asking what do I mean? Some of the things you are editing are not factual; I suppose it's good to try to follow OR if you are doing so. You could be incorrect at times. Howdoesitgo1 ( talk) 23:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to accuse someone of something, please provide
evidence, or else it's a baseless claim and can be a violation of attacking other users. @
Howdoesitgo1: please stop accusing other users without evidence. And also, please stop your disruptive editing by adding unnecessary words ( a storm which was a likely tornado) and phrases on Hurricane Zeta. In addition, most of your edits were of poor grammar or reverting correct grammar to incorrect grammar ( in Acworth, Georgia, a→ in Acworth, Georgia aIt's getting disruptive. You can accuse other editors of disruptive editing, but please don't do it yourself. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 13:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
If I may say something: every edit I make on these hurricanes is based off (a)the NHC, (b)the NWS, or (c)trusted news organization. I'm not going to say all my edits are correct, but I follow the trends I saw off of other articles and THAT was what I was doing for Hurricane Zeta. The lead sentence during active storms from what I've seen talks about what the hurricane is doing followed by what it has done. That is why I changed to what I did. Also, landfall points can be up for debate and I'm pretty sure I meant to put near not in so I'm sorry about that. However, to say its a "questionable" edit on my part is VERY offensive to me when I had to put with the vandal that wanted to change a current hurricane threatening Louisiana to Cat 5 status for 20 STRAIGHT MINUTES. Think about that next time you want to criticize me please. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 01:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I thought this was closed. Move on please. The faith thing literally happened several days ago. If you want to continue the debate, fine with me. Just do it on either WP:DRN, User talk:Jason Rees, or WP:ANI. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 22:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC) |
The section about Panama rain damages is doubtful. Not only the Hurricane is too far but the article does not make any link. The article is just saying "Las condiciones inestables del tiempo se mantienen en los próximos días." (The unstable conditions will persist for the next few days).
Pierre cb ( talk) 17:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
@Pierre cb, @TornadoLGS , the only rainfall, in the area around the time the article was written was in association with Eta. Also the source says “the recent rains” which most likely refers to Eta. Note also that they sentence says “possibly” and infers that it’s possible to be associated with Eta, even likely. Robloxsupersuperhappyface ( talk) 03:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Someone needs to update it as it’s no longer a hurricane and is currently weakening — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.109.93 ( talk) 18:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
I was looking at the initial sentence for this article and the way it was written really didn't read well in my mind. I was going to change it to something that sounded better, though I was worried that the sentence might lose the pertinent information that, although it had a certain intensity mark, that it had weakened, though it was still a concern. I was thinking of changing it to "Hurricane Eta is a currently active tropical depression over Honduras that, before making landfall, became the second strongest November hurricane on record." I recognize this may become moot if someone changed to reflect a location or intensity change anyway, but I figured for the sake of setting a more readable stylistic standard for the first sentence it would be worth changing earlier. So what I'm asking is, is this sentence an okay substitute? I don't want to screw it up and confuse people who may be at risk from this storm. DarkSide830 ( talk) 23:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Does anybody have any information on preparations in Guatemala, impacts in El Salvador, or both for Mexico? Robloxsupersuperhappyface ( talk) 03:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
impacts will come out soon Meteorologist200 ( talk) 14:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Created by sockmaster. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
so I read the New York post article that the anonymous user posted and it seemed very relevant and interesting maybe we should look more into that subject Meteorologist200 ( talk) 14:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
@
Jasper Deng: Please don't point out grammar mistakes that are not on Eta's article here on this talk page. Yep, I capitalized "may" accidentally since I was editing on an Ipad mini at the time. @
TornadoLGS: The Washingtong Post did go with the NHC, put put there own speculations on Eta's intensity. Why not say that there was a lack of recon data and remove the speculation? ~ Destroyeraa
🌀
02:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
From USA TODAY (November 2) about Eta maybe becoming a Cat 5 –
Hurricane Eta gains historic strength, could reach Category 5 status when it hits Central America on Tuesday – "The hurricane center said Eta is expected to strengthen over the course of the next 12 hours and could possibly become a Category 5 storm of historic proportions." Cheers.
Drdpw (
talk)
11:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Listen, I didn't mean to make an argument. When I saw the article I saw it was from a known news source and that it was interesting. I wanted to share it here. I do understand that the NHC never let out an advisory on this so for now, we will just wait. Hurricane Michael was cat 4 at landfall but was upgraded. Same thing could happen so keep a look out on it. Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC) Continue to pray for those in Florida and Mexico. Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Also, the category 5 stuff is in meteorological history yet I thought you removed it? Meteorologist200 ( talk) 18:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng: It DID go through the northwestern eyewall. I tweeted about it. Besides, can't we just wait for the TCR? It was 7 mph short of Cat 5 intensity. If it was 155, I'd be fine. But 150? No. This was one source making a claim and I see absolutely no reason to mention. There are plenty of other storms that may have reached Cat 5 intensity (i.e. Joaquin), but we don't put in speculation unless its from the NHC because THAT it where the OFFICIAL AND FINAL call comes from. Also, don't give me that about trying to WIN an argument. I'm allowed to give my opinion and that is what I'm doing. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC) And one more thing to everyone out here. Short of editors getting in my case, this is like the third or fourth time that has criticized or attacked me when I'm just making opinion or edits in the past two weeks, which is really frustrating and annoying. This has been a long hurricane season and I understand that, but please, just take into consideration that we are here to have a discussion. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng: Okay. That was just disrespectful. Again, I'm entitled to my opinions and will not stand for personal attacks. I understand what your saying and I respected what you were saying, but YOU did not return the same kindness. I'm reporting this. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 03:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
anything new on it? Meteorologist200 ( talk) 17:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
|
This article is getting LONG and there will definitely be articles needed for Eta's track and impacts in certain areas. Has anyone started this yet? ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 19:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
maybe after this dissipates we can decide Meteorologist200 ( talk) 20:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Okay, i know that we only have accurate records when Hurricane Eta wasn’t at its full peak, but I think it is important that we stress we actually have no idea how strong this incredibly devastating hurricane was. It is quite unlucky considering that from the satellite stand-point, it looked like this was an insanely strong category 5, but we never got to have the true wind speed due to none of the jets leaving and making it to Eta.... We had readings of winds from 175-(almost)200 mph when using different technologies, but we never sent out anything until after the monster storm started losing strength, meaning there is only the info we have back when it was still at 150 mph. MANORVOanonymous ( talk) 20:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Please don't forget about ReliefWeb when expanding the Aftermath section. It's an invaluable resource for relief efforts in every country. ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 20:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
I don't focus in the writing as much as I do in say, updating info or taking part in antivandalism. However, I was wanting to know about an article for either one. Particularly Honduras, because it caused $5 billion at least and killed 62 people. It was at least a tropical storm and likely a hurricane. -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 13:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa: I saw you changed the damage estimates on Honduras to 5 billion in Honduran currency to USD - I changed it back to 5 billion USD, as the article draws comparisons to Mitch and clarifies that it was more than Mitch in Honduras, which was 4 billion USD. I don't actually read Spanish past a very beginner level, so I've used google translate for this, so I can't quite confirm that's the intended meaning. YellowSkarmory ( talk) 20:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I heard on the news that Tropical Storm Eta would likely hit Central Florida as either a tropical storm or a Category 1 hurricane. Should we add some more predictions on Eta rising northeast? Also, the storm track at the section Hurricane Eta#Meteorological history needs to be updated. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 13:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
{{I hate that we have to do this again but someone (cough, @ FleurDeOdile:) still thinks it’s fine to revert and cause an edit war over a high quality image to a lower-grade image of Eta at peak.
Nonetheless here’s the two images:
I obviously prefer the first one as it is 1.) much more vibrant 2.) it’s a larger image size 3.) it is higher in quality and 4.) it is not overly saturated with regards to the landmass.
I really hope this can be resolved frankly because I do not want a Delta repeat again. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 18:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi:
Lately the number of missing persons has been added to 3 countries in the table. I am sure there is but I cannot find any mention or references supporting those in the rest of the text. Can somebody correct this?
Pierre cb ( talk) 00:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
I saw a report by them saying there has been a mudslide today with 10 deaths in Guatemala. I assume this is from Eta. I can't find the report, is anyone able to find it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.126.173 ( talk) 18:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Is it just me, or is that lead insane? Can we cut it down a bit? Thx, Gex4pls ( talk) 20:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm Nicaraguan. I'm writing you to inform that official resources are official resources. The SINAPRED, the prevention board of Nicaragua, stated that "No se registraron afectaciones en vidas humanas." Which means:There were no effects on human lives. So you are citing from Reuters but this news agency did not confirm the source from the official government, just for unofficial sources. Could you please correct this cite? Thanks.
Here is the official resources, you may add it. SINAPRED Regards.--🌀 Byralaal ( +505-chat-toMe) 00:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Can we make this page, I think it's notable Thingofme ( talk) 00:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa, ChessEric, I like hurricanes, SMB99thx, Hurricanehink, Cyclonebiskit, Hurricane Noah, and KN2731: I was thinking about it-should these areas also have subarticles like Honduras?
Over the weekend I'll be extremely busy with Draft: Effects of Hurricane Charley in Florida(feel free to help!), and won't have time to work on this. -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
No need for a sub-article at this point. There is only 26 kb of readable text. A lot of the article's length right now are the references. Please add to this article before makin a sub-article. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Should we had this image to the Meteorological History section? Or another section?
🌀 HurricaneGeek🌀 { talk} — Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Are there any images of Eta as a C1 in the Gulf? If there is, I think should be included in the article. 🌀 HurricaneGeek🌀 { talk} 16:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the source that lists 94 deaths in Honduras and 60 in Guatemala is a source that combines both storms into the same article talking about impacts. However, I'd like someone else to take a look at this, as I could be misunderstanding it. [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarmory ( talk • contribs) 02:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
This needs semi protection, i dont know how to send a request however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justcgi ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
There have only been a couple instances of vandalism in the past two weeks. Semi-protection isn't necessary right now. TornadoLGS ( talk) 21:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)