This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hojōjutsu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, didn't Jackie Chan use a method like this in "Shanghai Noon"? Might be worth mentioning, just to clarify the method to us common folk. Somebody who understands something about martial arts should check it out.-- Elmeri B. Suokirahvi 18:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I responded to the wikify template and have added headings and links to the first two sections -- Dananimal 23:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
An alternative article, "Hojo-Jutsu" was also written. As this article ("Hojojutsu") is a lot older and (in my uneducated opinion) also better, I deleted the content of "Hojo-Jutsu" and turned it into a redirect. The last version before I tampered with it is here. Those interested might find material of use within it. -- Hoary 07:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you sure you have the correct characters for Hojo Jutsu? 捕縄術 = ho nawa jutsu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.119.11.33 ( talk) 18:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
This is indeed the correct kanji: 捕 can be read as "Tori" or "Ho", meaning "to grasp, capture, grab, etc.". 縄 can be read as "Nawa" or "Jō", meaning "rope". Thus 捕縄術 can be read as either Hojōjutsu or Torinawajutsu. Luke Crocker 00:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukecrocker ( talk • contribs)
"Unfortunately for western practitioners, there are currently no known English translations of these works." This would assume no western practitioners can read Japanese, or all western practitioners read or prefer English. Either case is not true. The comment is not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.221.222.70 ( talk) 15:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Most of this article is undocumented, and it appears to be original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.40.113 ( talk) 22:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hojōjutsu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, didn't Jackie Chan use a method like this in "Shanghai Noon"? Might be worth mentioning, just to clarify the method to us common folk. Somebody who understands something about martial arts should check it out.-- Elmeri B. Suokirahvi 18:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I responded to the wikify template and have added headings and links to the first two sections -- Dananimal 23:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
An alternative article, "Hojo-Jutsu" was also written. As this article ("Hojojutsu") is a lot older and (in my uneducated opinion) also better, I deleted the content of "Hojo-Jutsu" and turned it into a redirect. The last version before I tampered with it is here. Those interested might find material of use within it. -- Hoary 07:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you sure you have the correct characters for Hojo Jutsu? 捕縄術 = ho nawa jutsu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.119.11.33 ( talk) 18:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
This is indeed the correct kanji: 捕 can be read as "Tori" or "Ho", meaning "to grasp, capture, grab, etc.". 縄 can be read as "Nawa" or "Jō", meaning "rope". Thus 捕縄術 can be read as either Hojōjutsu or Torinawajutsu. Luke Crocker 00:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukecrocker ( talk • contribs)
"Unfortunately for western practitioners, there are currently no known English translations of these works." This would assume no western practitioners can read Japanese, or all western practitioners read or prefer English. Either case is not true. The comment is not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.221.222.70 ( talk) 15:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Most of this article is undocumented, and it appears to be original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.40.113 ( talk) 22:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)