This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of Rajputs redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded. burdak 02:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded with proper references. Thakur Deshraj is one of the prominent Historians from Rajasthan. He has mentioned about Rajputs in his book on Jat history page 113-114, w.r.t Imperial Gazetteer of India Vol 2 (page 307-308),
When Rajput word was not created and was not in use prior to 9th century how they are related with Rama or Pandawas. We need proper references. burdak ( talk) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
tell us about how this cast came in muslim history, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.29.99 ( talk) 20:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
HUSNAN RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 ( talk) 13:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
WAQAS RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK PAKISTAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 ( talk) 13:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
This article has become nigh-unintelligible, packed with lists and charts with no context. It has nearly no chronological order or consecutive development, large sections appear to be WP:SYNTHESIS arguing cases with huge blocks from one or two authors. It appears that a handful of major contributors have text-dumped in a bunch of data (raising some Copyright issues). Furhter the formatting and tone are way off WP standard, lots of sections start out "this section is about", there are random claims of authorship scattered in the actual text, several different referencing formats used, and generally just poor layout. I propose to make some massive chops throughout, removing those sections which are not properly referenced, have poor tone, or do not provide clear context. From the remaining decent material I'd like to get some chronological order and context to it, and go from there. Before I make sweeping changes, does anyone have any particular objections or concerns? MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
As per James Todd there were rajput kings in Rajasthan belongs to Yaduvanshi Ahir [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.71.160 ( talk) 04:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Following on from the work of MatthewVanitas, referred to above, I am likely to massively prune this article unless someone can at least turn into proper citations, per WP:CITE, some of the items mentioned in the Sources sections. The article may be correct but it is impossible for the reader to be sure. - Sitush ( talk) 18:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
User:Sitush recently cleaned blanked the article's section : Rajput resistance to Muslim invasions. The section is present since the very beginning of the article. The article remains incomplete without this section. So, unreferenced tags shud remain there, but the section shud be restored. I will try to provide references as well. SubQuad ( talk) 12:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of Rajputs redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded. burdak 02:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded with proper references. Thakur Deshraj is one of the prominent Historians from Rajasthan. He has mentioned about Rajputs in his book on Jat history page 113-114, w.r.t Imperial Gazetteer of India Vol 2 (page 307-308),
When Rajput word was not created and was not in use prior to 9th century how they are related with Rama or Pandawas. We need proper references. burdak ( talk) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
tell us about how this cast came in muslim history, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.29.99 ( talk) 20:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
HUSNAN RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 ( talk) 13:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
WAQAS RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK PAKISTAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 ( talk) 13:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
This article has become nigh-unintelligible, packed with lists and charts with no context. It has nearly no chronological order or consecutive development, large sections appear to be WP:SYNTHESIS arguing cases with huge blocks from one or two authors. It appears that a handful of major contributors have text-dumped in a bunch of data (raising some Copyright issues). Furhter the formatting and tone are way off WP standard, lots of sections start out "this section is about", there are random claims of authorship scattered in the actual text, several different referencing formats used, and generally just poor layout. I propose to make some massive chops throughout, removing those sections which are not properly referenced, have poor tone, or do not provide clear context. From the remaining decent material I'd like to get some chronological order and context to it, and go from there. Before I make sweeping changes, does anyone have any particular objections or concerns? MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
As per James Todd there were rajput kings in Rajasthan belongs to Yaduvanshi Ahir [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.71.160 ( talk) 04:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Following on from the work of MatthewVanitas, referred to above, I am likely to massively prune this article unless someone can at least turn into proper citations, per WP:CITE, some of the items mentioned in the Sources sections. The article may be correct but it is impossible for the reader to be sure. - Sitush ( talk) 18:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
User:Sitush recently cleaned blanked the article's section : Rajput resistance to Muslim invasions. The section is present since the very beginning of the article. The article remains incomplete without this section. So, unreferenced tags shud remain there, but the section shud be restored. I will try to provide references as well. SubQuad ( talk) 12:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)