This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hispania Baetica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do we need to link this to the Mauretania Tingitana article to clarify the relationship between the two provinces?
Al-Andalus was the whole Iberian Peninsula under Moorish domination, not just the Baetica. -- JoseFMartindelPozo 18:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. In the lead it currently states:
“ | Baetica was part of Al-Andalus under the Moors in the 8th century and corresponds to modern Andalucia. | ” |
For this to be true it should also mention Gibraltar, which is not part of Andalusia. I added this only to find that it has been reverted without any discussion and an edit summary of think of the Wikipedia reader: this is a reader service, not a hobby shop.
I would like to ask Wetman to please assume good faith, I am only here to help out. Thanks. -- Gibmetal 77 talk 21:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
What's up with that infobox at the top of the article? First, "this article" does not appear in Pliny's "Natural History"; Baetica does, or "the subject of this article." Second, do you realize how many hundreds if not thousands of articles this box could be placed on? And to what end, for what purpose? Why is this factoid of such overriding importance that it should be at the top of the article anyway? Third, the Natural History is not "the world's" (!) first encyclopedia, [1] though I suppose one could argue it's the earliest extant encyclopedia. But again, why is this the most important factoid to display at the top of an article about Baetica? Just asking. Cynwolfe ( talk) 22:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hispania Baetica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hispania Baetica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
In the List of governors, it includes Marcus Ulpius Trajanus before 67. The external link is to the emperor Trajan, which can't be right - he would of been too young? Kakko1 ( talk) 06:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hispania Baetica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do we need to link this to the Mauretania Tingitana article to clarify the relationship between the two provinces?
Al-Andalus was the whole Iberian Peninsula under Moorish domination, not just the Baetica. -- JoseFMartindelPozo 18:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. In the lead it currently states:
“ | Baetica was part of Al-Andalus under the Moors in the 8th century and corresponds to modern Andalucia. | ” |
For this to be true it should also mention Gibraltar, which is not part of Andalusia. I added this only to find that it has been reverted without any discussion and an edit summary of think of the Wikipedia reader: this is a reader service, not a hobby shop.
I would like to ask Wetman to please assume good faith, I am only here to help out. Thanks. -- Gibmetal 77 talk 21:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
What's up with that infobox at the top of the article? First, "this article" does not appear in Pliny's "Natural History"; Baetica does, or "the subject of this article." Second, do you realize how many hundreds if not thousands of articles this box could be placed on? And to what end, for what purpose? Why is this factoid of such overriding importance that it should be at the top of the article anyway? Third, the Natural History is not "the world's" (!) first encyclopedia, [1] though I suppose one could argue it's the earliest extant encyclopedia. But again, why is this the most important factoid to display at the top of an article about Baetica? Just asking. Cynwolfe ( talk) 22:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hispania Baetica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hispania Baetica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
In the List of governors, it includes Marcus Ulpius Trajanus before 67. The external link is to the emperor Trajan, which can't be right - he would of been too young? Kakko1 ( talk) 06:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)