This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:50, July 25, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Nice article, it does need more citations, there is a tiny bit of
WP:NNPOV in there {superior?) unless it can be cited and I had to remove the aircraft table as this article's scope would not normally include that. It's not entirely clear to me but this engine seems to an unlicensed copy (i.e. stolen!) of the Napier Lion, perhaps that could be clarified? Cheers
Nimbus(Cumulus nimbus floats by)22:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Thanks! I will review it and see what I can do. Most of the material is from the same book, so I can cite the pages - Only a couple of pages on it, some from the Napier Lion page here that I can research and use the citations that were used there. Yes, it is a stolen Lion, but I don't know about the specifications yet - they may have modified the bore/stroke etc. but I have not found it, so far.
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:50, July 25, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Nice article, it does need more citations, there is a tiny bit of
WP:NNPOV in there {superior?) unless it can be cited and I had to remove the aircraft table as this article's scope would not normally include that. It's not entirely clear to me but this engine seems to an unlicensed copy (i.e. stolen!) of the Napier Lion, perhaps that could be clarified? Cheers
Nimbus(Cumulus nimbus floats by)22:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Thanks! I will review it and see what I can do. Most of the material is from the same book, so I can cite the pages - Only a couple of pages on it, some from the Napier Lion page here that I can research and use the citations that were used there. Yes, it is a stolen Lion, but I don't know about the specifications yet - they may have modified the bore/stroke etc. but I have not found it, so far.