![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
who in the world that have time to see a 25,000,000 fps film at 25 fps? this will take more than 277 hour for each second. watching 10 secondes will take more than three months of 24 hour watching. and about a year to watch 30 second?!!
Link to the 200 million frames a second camera? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.111.108 ( talk) 10:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
I disagree with the merge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.138.4.141 ( talk • contribs) UTC 18:07, 11 September 2005.
I also disagree with the merge. Many applications of high speed cameras do not ever involve playing back the video at a slower speed. In many cases, various information is digitally extracted from the video stream for other sorts of analyses. While it is certainly possible to create slow motion video from a high speed camera, one could also create "slow motion" with a regular camera by playing the video back at a slower frame rate. It will not be as detailed, but it is still slow motion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.212.218.166 ( talk • contribs) UTC 19:19, 14 October 2005.
The arguments against the merge above seem persuasive to me. Also, I would be interested in hearing exactly why this article should be merged? -- Captain Disdain 00:28, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Disagree with merge. There are scientific used of high-speed cameras that are not related to filmmaking. Since the tag has been on for over a month, and no-one has agreed with the merge suggestion, I'll remove the tags from both articles, as per WP:BB -- Janke | Talk 10:32, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree that this shouldn't be merged with slow mo - but what about high speed photography? It seems clear that high speed cameras will be used for high speed photography, and that photography will be accomplished with high speed cameras. In other words, they are inseparable. Ehusman 01:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
How was it determined that the Weinberger link was an advertisement, but the nearly identical links to Cordin, AOS, SVSi, etc., are not? The only one that seems to be non-commercial is the first link to Dr. Alciatore's website. Ehusman 01:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
It is unneccesary, lets leave this page here for a while? I wanted info on high speed cameras, hence I am here and would not have wanted to be transferred to a page on high speed photography or slow motion. Additionally, I read (in a book)(and will verify and modify if I can find the source again)that high speed cameras capable of 1,000,000 sustained frames per second were used by the US military in Atomic Bomb Tests. Cheers, Bugle
One frame every 50 picoseconds is 1 frame every seconds is equivalent to or 20.000.000.000 frames per second. So one of the values stated in the text is not correct (and as there are no sources stated, there's no way to find out which one is wrong).
Either way, couldn't one watch a laser beam of photons traveling through fog at that rate? Light travels one foot in about one nanosecond in a vacuum. Picoseconds are a few orders of magnitude smaller than a nanosecond. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
67.33.112.74 (
talk) 17:51, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
My Samsung Galaxy S9+ can shoot slow motion video at 960 frames per second. [1] At almost four times the 250 fps threshold listed here, it's pretty clear that it fits the definition of a high-speed camera. According to the article I linked, a couple Sony Xperia phones can do this as well, and many more phones are only 10 fps short of the definition. Do you think this deserves a mention in the article? High-speed cameras have generally been thought of as specialty equipment, but it would seem that this is starting to change. flarn2006 [ u t c] time: 22:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
who in the world that have time to see a 25,000,000 fps film at 25 fps? this will take more than 277 hour for each second. watching 10 secondes will take more than three months of 24 hour watching. and about a year to watch 30 second?!!
Link to the 200 million frames a second camera? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.111.108 ( talk) 10:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
I disagree with the merge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.138.4.141 ( talk • contribs) UTC 18:07, 11 September 2005.
I also disagree with the merge. Many applications of high speed cameras do not ever involve playing back the video at a slower speed. In many cases, various information is digitally extracted from the video stream for other sorts of analyses. While it is certainly possible to create slow motion video from a high speed camera, one could also create "slow motion" with a regular camera by playing the video back at a slower frame rate. It will not be as detailed, but it is still slow motion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.212.218.166 ( talk • contribs) UTC 19:19, 14 October 2005.
The arguments against the merge above seem persuasive to me. Also, I would be interested in hearing exactly why this article should be merged? -- Captain Disdain 00:28, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Disagree with merge. There are scientific used of high-speed cameras that are not related to filmmaking. Since the tag has been on for over a month, and no-one has agreed with the merge suggestion, I'll remove the tags from both articles, as per WP:BB -- Janke | Talk 10:32, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree that this shouldn't be merged with slow mo - but what about high speed photography? It seems clear that high speed cameras will be used for high speed photography, and that photography will be accomplished with high speed cameras. In other words, they are inseparable. Ehusman 01:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
How was it determined that the Weinberger link was an advertisement, but the nearly identical links to Cordin, AOS, SVSi, etc., are not? The only one that seems to be non-commercial is the first link to Dr. Alciatore's website. Ehusman 01:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
It is unneccesary, lets leave this page here for a while? I wanted info on high speed cameras, hence I am here and would not have wanted to be transferred to a page on high speed photography or slow motion. Additionally, I read (in a book)(and will verify and modify if I can find the source again)that high speed cameras capable of 1,000,000 sustained frames per second were used by the US military in Atomic Bomb Tests. Cheers, Bugle
One frame every 50 picoseconds is 1 frame every seconds is equivalent to or 20.000.000.000 frames per second. So one of the values stated in the text is not correct (and as there are no sources stated, there's no way to find out which one is wrong).
Either way, couldn't one watch a laser beam of photons traveling through fog at that rate? Light travels one foot in about one nanosecond in a vacuum. Picoseconds are a few orders of magnitude smaller than a nanosecond. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
67.33.112.74 (
talk) 17:51, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
My Samsung Galaxy S9+ can shoot slow motion video at 960 frames per second. [1] At almost four times the 250 fps threshold listed here, it's pretty clear that it fits the definition of a high-speed camera. According to the article I linked, a couple Sony Xperia phones can do this as well, and many more phones are only 10 fps short of the definition. Do you think this deserves a mention in the article? High-speed cameras have generally been thought of as specialty equipment, but it would seem that this is starting to change. flarn2006 [ u t c] time: 22:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)