Her (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dhruswicki.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
If anyone starts a Marketing/Promotion section they should probably mention BeautifulHandwrittenLetters.com which is the place where Twombly works and redirects to the official website. -- 109.76.245.190 ( talk) 12:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
As-currently-written is that the plot or the whole story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.1.157.67 ( talk) 21:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
There has been lots of commentary of all sorts on this film. The Reception section is disappointingly short (instead people keep adding to the sprawling unsourced See Also section). There is potential to expand the Reception section to include a broader range of opinions, beyond film critics. Science Fiction writer and futurist Ray Kurzweil prasied the film writing a review and analysis on his website. -- 147.252.95.35 ( talk) 18:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The box office section paraphrased "underwhelming" (direct quote) as "disappointing" (paraphrase) as it seemed less POV to me at the time. It has since been changed to a direct quote, which is fine but I thought disappointing was a fairer and more neutral choice of wording, whereas "underwhelming" seems overly harsh even it if it a direct quote. I don't appreciate accusations in edit summaries my edits were in good faith. -- 109.77.196.78 ( talk) 23:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone else feel that the appropriate genre to place the film under to be "social science fiction" than merely science fiction? -- 121.54.58.246 ( talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Note, after reviewing the RS, I have added the genre back in. As far as I can tell, the website "The Verge" is singularly responsible for spreading the meme that this is not science fiction. Not only are they wrong, but the film trade mags and critical reviews disagree. I suspect that this kind of problem tends to occur with people who think that SF primarily concerns itself with nuts and bolts spaceships, aliens, and strange, but bizarre fantasy. This is a common misconception about SF. This film explores the idea of what it would be like to have an actual relationship with an AI. This is as SF as the genre can get. "The Verge" is simply wrong on this one. Viriditas ( talk) 06:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS ( talk · contribs) 23:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll take this. Expect comments up within a week.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Her (film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Opencooper has insisted on using "8.5 out of 10" rather than 8.5/10 for Her's average Rotten Tomatoes score. The reason I insist on a slash is that it is clearly the standard on Wikipedia; go look up any other film and you will see that the slash is used, not words. If you don't agree with that, by all means go correct all those thousands of articles. 73.109.106.183 ( talk) 05:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Opencooper, after looking into this further, MOS:SLASH permits the use of an unspaced slash to express a ratio. I'm not aware of a guideline that discourages the slash in this situation, so I'm withdrawing my support for its removal in this article. Seems unnecessary and not likely to gain widespread consensus. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 07:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
For consistency I'd recommend also using 90/100 for Metacritic too, or we could use the other commonly used shorthand for out of 100. -- 109.76.150.6 ( talk) 21:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Her (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please seek out references which specifically identity this as an allusion in the film by critics before adding this anywhere in the article, whether in the plot or a "See also". It is not appropriate to add WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH to any Wikipedia articles. The film is deliberately vague about what is happening with the OSes at the end and even more so about "where they are going", much less why. I've had to remove several instances of OR from the plot, most of them editors' inferences about the motivations of the OSes and "the singularity", which as far as I understand would involve human consciousness merging/being upgraded, not simply a bunch of AIs anyway. So please stop forcing the article to say things which are your personal interpretations. If there are good WP:RELIABLE SOURCES for any of this (by which I mean film critics talking about it in this film, not just articles about the singularity in general, there can be a conversation as to where they should go in the article--likely not the plot. ZarhanFastfire ( talk) 01:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Theodore explains [to Samantha] that, although he and Amy (Amy Adams) dated briefly in college, they are only good friends, and that Amy is married.
Who the firetruck is this Amy chick? — MaxEnt 13:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Someone with seniority here should add a section called "Spoilers". One of those spoilers should be to "protect" against the following experience.
One of the treasures of this movie is the relationship between Samantha and Theodore - especially in the first half hour. Ms. Johansson's voicing of Samantha is supremely talented and irresistable. However, the sad fact is that Ms. Johansson was added to the project in post production. This means that all the rapport between Mr. Phoenix and Ms. Johansson - between Theodore and Samantha - is a complete illusion because not one syllable of dialogue was actually voiced / heard by the other actor / and responded to (in real time) through the whole movie. Everytime Theodore is responding to "her", he is not responding to Ms. Johannsson, but to some unknown actress who was replaced by Ms. Johansson in a role switch implemented post production (after filming, simply alone in a recording studio). This fact damages the sweet rapport (or illusion of rapport) the movie so wonderfully attains.
Putting this post-production fact somewhere in a hidden "this may damage the movie, are you sure you want to read it" type of section would enhance the *wiki* entry and preserve the sweetness of the film. QuixoteReborn ( talk) 01:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Her (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dhruswicki.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
If anyone starts a Marketing/Promotion section they should probably mention BeautifulHandwrittenLetters.com which is the place where Twombly works and redirects to the official website. -- 109.76.245.190 ( talk) 12:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
As-currently-written is that the plot or the whole story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.1.157.67 ( talk) 21:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
There has been lots of commentary of all sorts on this film. The Reception section is disappointingly short (instead people keep adding to the sprawling unsourced See Also section). There is potential to expand the Reception section to include a broader range of opinions, beyond film critics. Science Fiction writer and futurist Ray Kurzweil prasied the film writing a review and analysis on his website. -- 147.252.95.35 ( talk) 18:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The box office section paraphrased "underwhelming" (direct quote) as "disappointing" (paraphrase) as it seemed less POV to me at the time. It has since been changed to a direct quote, which is fine but I thought disappointing was a fairer and more neutral choice of wording, whereas "underwhelming" seems overly harsh even it if it a direct quote. I don't appreciate accusations in edit summaries my edits were in good faith. -- 109.77.196.78 ( talk) 23:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone else feel that the appropriate genre to place the film under to be "social science fiction" than merely science fiction? -- 121.54.58.246 ( talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Note, after reviewing the RS, I have added the genre back in. As far as I can tell, the website "The Verge" is singularly responsible for spreading the meme that this is not science fiction. Not only are they wrong, but the film trade mags and critical reviews disagree. I suspect that this kind of problem tends to occur with people who think that SF primarily concerns itself with nuts and bolts spaceships, aliens, and strange, but bizarre fantasy. This is a common misconception about SF. This film explores the idea of what it would be like to have an actual relationship with an AI. This is as SF as the genre can get. "The Verge" is simply wrong on this one. Viriditas ( talk) 06:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS ( talk · contribs) 23:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll take this. Expect comments up within a week.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Her (film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Opencooper has insisted on using "8.5 out of 10" rather than 8.5/10 for Her's average Rotten Tomatoes score. The reason I insist on a slash is that it is clearly the standard on Wikipedia; go look up any other film and you will see that the slash is used, not words. If you don't agree with that, by all means go correct all those thousands of articles. 73.109.106.183 ( talk) 05:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Opencooper, after looking into this further, MOS:SLASH permits the use of an unspaced slash to express a ratio. I'm not aware of a guideline that discourages the slash in this situation, so I'm withdrawing my support for its removal in this article. Seems unnecessary and not likely to gain widespread consensus. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 07:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
For consistency I'd recommend also using 90/100 for Metacritic too, or we could use the other commonly used shorthand for out of 100. -- 109.76.150.6 ( talk) 21:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Her (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please seek out references which specifically identity this as an allusion in the film by critics before adding this anywhere in the article, whether in the plot or a "See also". It is not appropriate to add WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH to any Wikipedia articles. The film is deliberately vague about what is happening with the OSes at the end and even more so about "where they are going", much less why. I've had to remove several instances of OR from the plot, most of them editors' inferences about the motivations of the OSes and "the singularity", which as far as I understand would involve human consciousness merging/being upgraded, not simply a bunch of AIs anyway. So please stop forcing the article to say things which are your personal interpretations. If there are good WP:RELIABLE SOURCES for any of this (by which I mean film critics talking about it in this film, not just articles about the singularity in general, there can be a conversation as to where they should go in the article--likely not the plot. ZarhanFastfire ( talk) 01:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Theodore explains [to Samantha] that, although he and Amy (Amy Adams) dated briefly in college, they are only good friends, and that Amy is married.
Who the firetruck is this Amy chick? — MaxEnt 13:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Someone with seniority here should add a section called "Spoilers". One of those spoilers should be to "protect" against the following experience.
One of the treasures of this movie is the relationship between Samantha and Theodore - especially in the first half hour. Ms. Johansson's voicing of Samantha is supremely talented and irresistable. However, the sad fact is that Ms. Johansson was added to the project in post production. This means that all the rapport between Mr. Phoenix and Ms. Johansson - between Theodore and Samantha - is a complete illusion because not one syllable of dialogue was actually voiced / heard by the other actor / and responded to (in real time) through the whole movie. Everytime Theodore is responding to "her", he is not responding to Ms. Johannsson, but to some unknown actress who was replaced by Ms. Johansson in a role switch implemented post production (after filming, simply alone in a recording studio). This fact damages the sweet rapport (or illusion of rapport) the movie so wonderfully attains.
Putting this post-production fact somewhere in a hidden "this may damage the movie, are you sure you want to read it" type of section would enhance the *wiki* entry and preserve the sweetness of the film. QuixoteReborn ( talk) 01:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)