GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 07:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
I've now done a very quick initial read of this nomination, but I've not checked any citations / references nor copyright status of images, and on this basis it appears to be at or about GA-level. However, there is a {{ disambiguation}} flag that aught to be addressed.
I'm now started a more detailed review of the article against WP:WIAGA, starting at the Life section and finishing with the Lead. This is likely to take another day or so, at least. Pyrotec ( talk) 18:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
....Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
At this point I'm putting the review "On Hold". In order to make GA-status the lead needs to be addressed and once that has been done I'll award it a GA. The disambiguation aught to be addresses, but its not mandatory to achieve GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 17:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An informative and well referenced article.
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on a "fine" article. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 07:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
I've now done a very quick initial read of this nomination, but I've not checked any citations / references nor copyright status of images, and on this basis it appears to be at or about GA-level. However, there is a {{ disambiguation}} flag that aught to be addressed.
I'm now started a more detailed review of the article against WP:WIAGA, starting at the Life section and finishing with the Lead. This is likely to take another day or so, at least. Pyrotec ( talk) 18:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
....Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
At this point I'm putting the review "On Hold". In order to make GA-status the lead needs to be addressed and once that has been done I'll award it a GA. The disambiguation aught to be addresses, but its not mandatory to achieve GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 17:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An informative and well referenced article.
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on a "fine" article. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)