Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article very clearly does not meet modern GA standards. Even a passing glance reveals unreferenced paragraphs, outstanding citation requests, dead links in references and poorly formatted references. Further, I have serious doubts about whether this article is comprehensive. The article has barely 900 words; I've written start-class Did You Knows that were longer. I would ask a representative of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics to comment on the comprehensiveness, as I am a sociologist, and don't feel qualified to judge the "Contributions" section. PS. Also, MoS failure with regard to WP:LEAD (does not seem like a comprehensive summary, contains citations and claims not present in the body). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article very clearly does not meet modern GA standards. Even a passing glance reveals unreferenced paragraphs, outstanding citation requests, dead links in references and poorly formatted references. Further, I have serious doubts about whether this article is comprehensive. The article has barely 900 words; I've written start-class Did You Knows that were longer. I would ask a representative of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics to comment on the comprehensiveness, as I am a sociologist, and don't feel qualified to judge the "Contributions" section. PS. Also, MoS failure with regard to WP:LEAD (does not seem like a comprehensive summary, contains citations and claims not present in the body). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)