This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hayabusa2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving Hayabusa2 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on the following dates: | ![]() |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 27, 2022. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite conference}}
: CS1 maint: date format (
link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite conference}}
: Text "1391" ignored (
help); Text "39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX)" ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date format (
link)-- Stone ( talk) 20:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
The statement "The explosion will form a copper penetrator hitting the asteroid with a velocity of 2 km/s" is unclear. Perhaps something like "The copper penetrator's velocity of 2 km/s will create an explosion due to the kinetic energy of its impact."? 128.170.224.10 ( talk) 20:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)daddyodel
Is it worth mentioning in the article that Hayabusa 2 was discovered as near-Earth asteroid 2014 XX39?
-- Kheider ( talk) 22:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
MINERVA is mentioned in the infobox, but not described ? - Rod57 ( talk) 14:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
There is no information whatsoever on how the sample will be collected and how it will be sent to Earth. Rowan Forest ( talk) 22:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
If you check
https://www.hayabusa2.jaxa.jp/en/
it shows that Hayabusa2 will fly on.
It will be a "flyby" of earth but deliver the re-entry capsule (containing 1kg of rocks).
So "end of mission" is incorrect. It will, in fact, meet two other astropids.
Should this not be reflected in the wikipedia page?
Jobst.schmalenbach ( talk) 01:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC) [1]
References
Template:Space observatories says it's proposed, but it looks to me to have been quite operational, should it be moved? Is its current task of asteroid-rendezvousing not considered space observing? Drone Better ( talk) 13:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that in the article, it mentioned that 2001 CC21 was an L-type asteroid. Is there any citations for this? Thank you. 72.203.63.234 ( talk) 02:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
One source says that this will be the next target for Hayabusa2, but on the Hayabusa2 article, it says that it will be 2001 CC21. 24.120.60.99 ( talk) 18:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
If the Hayabusa 2 was planned for 6 years? which year did this start from? 115.69.22.123 ( talk) 11:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hayabusa2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving Hayabusa2 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on the following dates: | ![]() |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 27, 2022. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite conference}}
: CS1 maint: date format (
link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite conference}}
: Text "1391" ignored (
help); Text "39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX)" ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date format (
link)-- Stone ( talk) 20:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
The statement "The explosion will form a copper penetrator hitting the asteroid with a velocity of 2 km/s" is unclear. Perhaps something like "The copper penetrator's velocity of 2 km/s will create an explosion due to the kinetic energy of its impact."? 128.170.224.10 ( talk) 20:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)daddyodel
Is it worth mentioning in the article that Hayabusa 2 was discovered as near-Earth asteroid 2014 XX39?
-- Kheider ( talk) 22:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
MINERVA is mentioned in the infobox, but not described ? - Rod57 ( talk) 14:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
There is no information whatsoever on how the sample will be collected and how it will be sent to Earth. Rowan Forest ( talk) 22:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
If you check
https://www.hayabusa2.jaxa.jp/en/
it shows that Hayabusa2 will fly on.
It will be a "flyby" of earth but deliver the re-entry capsule (containing 1kg of rocks).
So "end of mission" is incorrect. It will, in fact, meet two other astropids.
Should this not be reflected in the wikipedia page?
Jobst.schmalenbach ( talk) 01:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC) [1]
References
Template:Space observatories says it's proposed, but it looks to me to have been quite operational, should it be moved? Is its current task of asteroid-rendezvousing not considered space observing? Drone Better ( talk) 13:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that in the article, it mentioned that 2001 CC21 was an L-type asteroid. Is there any citations for this? Thank you. 72.203.63.234 ( talk) 02:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
One source says that this will be the next target for Hayabusa2, but on the Hayabusa2 article, it says that it will be 2001 CC21. 24.120.60.99 ( talk) 18:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
If the Hayabusa 2 was planned for 6 years? which year did this start from? 115.69.22.123 ( talk) 11:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)