![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I never heard that Gyeongbok palace is still used by the ex-royal family of Chosun dynasty. They don't live there. I corrected it but somebody changed it back.
I have replaced the picture with the old version. I like the new picture, too, but its licence is unclear. Also, the old picture is a featured picture... Kokiri 18:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Several sections of the article appeared to be in violation of copyright regulations. The material appears to have been copied from the following source: [1], among others. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material. I have removed the sections of copyrighted material, and after some time, I will be deleting them from the page history in order to remove the precense of copyrighted material from the Wiki. However, the material is in the page history for now, if anyone wants to try and re-write the information to not be in copyright violation. Please do not re-add copyrighted material to the article. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 02:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
This royal palace along with others in Seoul has been called in several spelling such as below
so I move it back to the original title to discuss it for the matter. I think this naming matter is associated with other suffixes such as san (산 mountain), sa or am (사, 암, Buddhist temple), so this can't be simply spelled. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was not moved. Jafeluv ( talk) 22:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Gyeongbokgung → Gyeongbok Palace — gung is palace in English, move per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) Gryffindor ( talk) 17:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Why would a dead queen need quarters? Do you mean the Queen Dowager (taebimama)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.223.181 ( talk) 13:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
As title. Huge chunks of it have no sources and have some formatting/style issues. The names of individual buildings in the body don't need to be bolded. toobigtokale ( talk) 14:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I never heard that Gyeongbok palace is still used by the ex-royal family of Chosun dynasty. They don't live there. I corrected it but somebody changed it back.
I have replaced the picture with the old version. I like the new picture, too, but its licence is unclear. Also, the old picture is a featured picture... Kokiri 18:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Several sections of the article appeared to be in violation of copyright regulations. The material appears to have been copied from the following source: [1], among others. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material. I have removed the sections of copyrighted material, and after some time, I will be deleting them from the page history in order to remove the precense of copyrighted material from the Wiki. However, the material is in the page history for now, if anyone wants to try and re-write the information to not be in copyright violation. Please do not re-add copyrighted material to the article. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 02:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
This royal palace along with others in Seoul has been called in several spelling such as below
so I move it back to the original title to discuss it for the matter. I think this naming matter is associated with other suffixes such as san (산 mountain), sa or am (사, 암, Buddhist temple), so this can't be simply spelled. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was not moved. Jafeluv ( talk) 22:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Gyeongbokgung → Gyeongbok Palace — gung is palace in English, move per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) Gryffindor ( talk) 17:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Why would a dead queen need quarters? Do you mean the Queen Dowager (taebimama)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.223.181 ( talk) 13:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
As title. Huge chunks of it have no sources and have some formatting/style issues. The names of individual buildings in the body don't need to be bolded. toobigtokale ( talk) 14:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)