![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1) Kusunose just recently added "Ulleung-do" in the context of noteworthy events of Genroku 9. I wonder if maybe this would be better introduced in the context of a note, if at all? Perhaps this discussion page is an appropriate venue to explain what I've done and to invite comment or further edits?
(2) As I did not myself upload the information about this Takeshima travel ban -- and since there is no source cited for this minor "fact", I'm at a loss to assess whether its reliability. I suppose it's possible that the bakufu's travel ban, if it were verified, might have been intended to apply to some other Takeshima island? I notice that there appear to be a number of unresolved issues in the Joseon and Edo Period segment of the Liancourt Rocks article; and the discussion page does suggest additional unanswered questions. Again, it seems appropriate to invite comment or further edits? Ooperhoofd 17:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the suspect "fact" in Genroku 9 pending some unknown source citation; and the edit summary will alert anyone who may be interested that there are relevant comments and questions here. Ooperhoofd 19:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
The content on Kaempfer in Nagasaki is very interesting, but perhaps it would be better to move the details to the page on Kaempfer himself, leaving the link. (Also: is there a reason the names of Titsingh and Siebold, etc. show up in the "See also" section? No explanation is provided.) MB, 129.194.8.73 ( talk) 11:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1) Kusunose just recently added "Ulleung-do" in the context of noteworthy events of Genroku 9. I wonder if maybe this would be better introduced in the context of a note, if at all? Perhaps this discussion page is an appropriate venue to explain what I've done and to invite comment or further edits?
(2) As I did not myself upload the information about this Takeshima travel ban -- and since there is no source cited for this minor "fact", I'm at a loss to assess whether its reliability. I suppose it's possible that the bakufu's travel ban, if it were verified, might have been intended to apply to some other Takeshima island? I notice that there appear to be a number of unresolved issues in the Joseon and Edo Period segment of the Liancourt Rocks article; and the discussion page does suggest additional unanswered questions. Again, it seems appropriate to invite comment or further edits? Ooperhoofd 17:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the suspect "fact" in Genroku 9 pending some unknown source citation; and the edit summary will alert anyone who may be interested that there are relevant comments and questions here. Ooperhoofd 19:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
The content on Kaempfer in Nagasaki is very interesting, but perhaps it would be better to move the details to the page on Kaempfer himself, leaving the link. (Also: is there a reason the names of Titsingh and Siebold, etc. show up in the "See also" section? No explanation is provided.) MB, 129.194.8.73 ( talk) 11:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
References