This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
An IP editor is particularly insistent on adding a link for
a cold (in this and one other article, along with
allergies).
Colds are perhaps the single most common illness in the word and I am hard-pressed to imagine any native speaker of English in any part of the world being unfamiliar with the illness. Additionally, there is nothing in particular about colds that is less-commonly known that in any way impacts the events of the episode.
Comparing this to
WP:OVERLINK, there is no reason to include the link.
The IP editor's only reaction to it being removed here and a request that they discuss the issue has been to restore the link without comment. - SummerPhDv2.023:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
An IP editor is particularly insistent on adding a link for
a cold (in this and one other article, along with
allergies).
Colds are perhaps the single most common illness in the word and I am hard-pressed to imagine any native speaker of English in any part of the world being unfamiliar with the illness. Additionally, there is nothing in particular about colds that is less-commonly known that in any way impacts the events of the episode.
Comparing this to
WP:OVERLINK, there is no reason to include the link.
The IP editor's only reaction to it being removed here and a request that they discuss the issue has been to restore the link without comment. - SummerPhDv2.023:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply