| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Final Destination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 180 days
 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Opposes uncountered, title(s) stand, not moved. ( non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 05:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Final Destination → Final Destination (franchise)
- Final Destination (disambiguation) → Final Destination
– The Baudelaire Fortune moved the franchise page without considering the RM consensus three years ago. I reverted it back, so I start another RM for proper procedure. This affected the statistics, in contrast with previous way. As for primacy, while WP:DABCONCEPT implies that the franchise is the broad concept and primary topic, statistics may prove that neither is primary at all. George Ho ( talk) 00:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. A page was moved inappropriately according to consensus and was reverted. No action is necessary. The franchise is far and away the best topic to have at undisambiguated "Final Destination". Nohomersryan ( talk) 00:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 23:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Boilerplate "compared to high grossing horror franchises" jnestorius( talk) 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I've a problem with the description of the film as being about "Death personified" as there is no person, there is no skeletal figure with a scythe, no angel of death. It is death in the abstract, an "invisible antagonist", a force of nature. It might be more accurate to say it is the manifestation of death, like a strong wind we clearly see the consequences without seeing the wind itself. The article needs better more careful phrasing. -- 37.110.218.43 ( talk) 11:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
WP:FILMRATINGS says not to include film ratings. For some reason this article ignores the guidelines and includes a table of ratings anyway. There does not appear to be anything notable (or even interesting) about the ratings. Why does this article includes a ratings table? -- 109.77.214.141 ( talk) 23:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the table. [1] I can only guess that someone added it in good faith unaware of WP:FILMRATINGS, but still it should at least have been properly referenced WP:V. If someone really wants to add it back they should find references to show the ratings were notable WP:N. -- 109.78.202.222 ( talk) 16:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class horror articles
- Mid-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Final Destination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 180 days
|
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Opposes uncountered, title(s) stand, not moved. ( non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 05:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Final Destination → Final Destination (franchise)
- Final Destination (disambiguation) → Final Destination
– The Baudelaire Fortune moved the franchise page without considering the RM consensus three years ago. I reverted it back, so I start another RM for proper procedure. This affected the statistics, in contrast with previous way. As for primacy, while WP:DABCONCEPT implies that the franchise is the broad concept and primary topic, statistics may prove that neither is primary at all. George Ho ( talk) 00:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. A page was moved inappropriately according to consensus and was reverted. No action is necessary. The franchise is far and away the best topic to have at undisambiguated "Final Destination". Nohomersryan ( talk) 00:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 23:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Boilerplate "compared to high grossing horror franchises" jnestorius( talk) 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I've a problem with the description of the film as being about "Death personified" as there is no person, there is no skeletal figure with a scythe, no angel of death. It is death in the abstract, an "invisible antagonist", a force of nature. It might be more accurate to say it is the manifestation of death, like a strong wind we clearly see the consequences without seeing the wind itself. The article needs better more careful phrasing. -- 37.110.218.43 ( talk) 11:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
WP:FILMRATINGS says not to include film ratings. For some reason this article ignores the guidelines and includes a table of ratings anyway. There does not appear to be anything notable (or even interesting) about the ratings. Why does this article includes a ratings table? -- 109.77.214.141 ( talk) 23:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the table. [1] I can only guess that someone added it in good faith unaware of WP:FILMRATINGS, but still it should at least have been properly referenced WP:V. If someone really wants to add it back they should find references to show the ratings were notable WP:N. -- 109.78.202.222 ( talk) 16:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class horror articles
- Mid-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles