This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
For Piotrus: Here are three examples of notable coverage of Fiksu.
3 Secrets for Growing From $1 Million to $100 Million in 3.5 Years
More recent examples include Here’s How Many People Are Still Rocking the Original iPhone by Victor Luckerson in TIME, and while that article is less focused purely on Fiksu, it is entirely built on data provided by the company.
As posted to Piotrus's talk page:
Saw the proposed deletion on Fiksu and wanted to respond. I thought the extensive list of secondary sources cited -- including what should be reliable secondary sources such as Inc. (magazine)., The Boston Globe, The Boston Business Journal, and VentureBeat -- would establish notability? Many of the linked references are substantial pieces of coverage of the company. Snackwell (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
About your Third Opinion request: Your request for a 3O has been removed (i.e. denied) because 3O, like all forms of moderated content dispute resolution at Wikipedia require a thorough discussion on the article talk page before requesting assistance with a dispute. I will note that the fact that all three of the proposed sources, above, are {{ dead link}}s and are not archived in the Internet Archive does not make the task of determining whether they satisfy the "significant coverage" element of the general notability guideline any easier. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC) (3O volunteer) (Not watching this page)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
For Piotrus: Here are three examples of notable coverage of Fiksu.
3 Secrets for Growing From $1 Million to $100 Million in 3.5 Years
More recent examples include Here’s How Many People Are Still Rocking the Original iPhone by Victor Luckerson in TIME, and while that article is less focused purely on Fiksu, it is entirely built on data provided by the company.
As posted to Piotrus's talk page:
Saw the proposed deletion on Fiksu and wanted to respond. I thought the extensive list of secondary sources cited -- including what should be reliable secondary sources such as Inc. (magazine)., The Boston Globe, The Boston Business Journal, and VentureBeat -- would establish notability? Many of the linked references are substantial pieces of coverage of the company. Snackwell (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
About your Third Opinion request: Your request for a 3O has been removed (i.e. denied) because 3O, like all forms of moderated content dispute resolution at Wikipedia require a thorough discussion on the article talk page before requesting assistance with a dispute. I will note that the fact that all three of the proposed sources, above, are {{ dead link}}s and are not archived in the Internet Archive does not make the task of determining whether they satisfy the "significant coverage" element of the general notability guideline any easier. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC) (3O volunteer) (Not watching this page)