![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Alright, so you know that picture of the Link figma? Well my idea was to switch it with a picture of the 200th figma, shown here (Preferably this picture).
I have #200 on preorder. I can't wait for it to arrive. This doesn't relate to the article. I just thought of putting it out there.
I'll make a "Support/Oppose" list down below, so that it'd look a bit like a petition. Just place your name at the end of whichever side you take's list and type # below your name to make it easier on the next person. And don't be shy! I want to know what you think of my idea! Thanks!
– N Studios 2 19:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is the Y/N list I mentioned above. Just put ~~~ next to the bottommost # and put another one below your name. If the bottommost # is taken, simply place another at the end of the list. And please don't edit any of the other names in the list. Thanks!
I realize that I'm ten years late for this, so this is more for just in case someone tries to pull the same thing again in the future, given how it already happened once.
The line is very prolific in Japan, and already was as of 2010 (when the article was previously nominated for deletion) due to its pedigree of having being created by MAX Watanabe and Masaki Asai. It had already enjoyed widespread media coverage even before the series launch.
With this context, the deletion nomination- which began with "Unnotable line of "action figures". No significant coverage found in any books, nor in any news sources. Only news coverage found is minor mentions in ANN reports", and was followed up with a few people claiming that they could not find any sources - comes of as kind of racist: These people clearly did not bother looking for Japanese sources, and seemingly concluded that if something is not covered by western media, then it is not significant. Given how the person who nominated the article for deletion in the first place can be seen insisting that none of the hundreds of sources subsequently linked count, it really looks to me like the nomination was made in bad faith.
Of course the line now has significant coverage in English as well so I may very well be worrying over nothing, but I just wanted to put this out here. In any case I did add a line about media coverage to the article, and given how Dengeki Hobby alone has hundreds of articles on the line I think that should be more than enough to establish notability. 109.236.4.20 ( talk) 19:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Alright, so you know that picture of the Link figma? Well my idea was to switch it with a picture of the 200th figma, shown here (Preferably this picture).
I have #200 on preorder. I can't wait for it to arrive. This doesn't relate to the article. I just thought of putting it out there.
I'll make a "Support/Oppose" list down below, so that it'd look a bit like a petition. Just place your name at the end of whichever side you take's list and type # below your name to make it easier on the next person. And don't be shy! I want to know what you think of my idea! Thanks!
– N Studios 2 19:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is the Y/N list I mentioned above. Just put ~~~ next to the bottommost # and put another one below your name. If the bottommost # is taken, simply place another at the end of the list. And please don't edit any of the other names in the list. Thanks!
I realize that I'm ten years late for this, so this is more for just in case someone tries to pull the same thing again in the future, given how it already happened once.
The line is very prolific in Japan, and already was as of 2010 (when the article was previously nominated for deletion) due to its pedigree of having being created by MAX Watanabe and Masaki Asai. It had already enjoyed widespread media coverage even before the series launch.
With this context, the deletion nomination- which began with "Unnotable line of "action figures". No significant coverage found in any books, nor in any news sources. Only news coverage found is minor mentions in ANN reports", and was followed up with a few people claiming that they could not find any sources - comes of as kind of racist: These people clearly did not bother looking for Japanese sources, and seemingly concluded that if something is not covered by western media, then it is not significant. Given how the person who nominated the article for deletion in the first place can be seen insisting that none of the hundreds of sources subsequently linked count, it really looks to me like the nomination was made in bad faith.
Of course the line now has significant coverage in English as well so I may very well be worrying over nothing, but I just wanted to put this out here. In any case I did add a line about media coverage to the article, and given how Dengeki Hobby alone has hundreds of articles on the line I think that should be more than enough to establish notability. 109.236.4.20 ( talk) 19:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)