![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus ( talk · contribs) on 25 November 2022. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just found this site last night: http://www.technovelgy.com/
It is amazing what a comprehensive collection of inventions and tech gadgetry that this website contains, referring to countless science fiction stories and author ideas... And how many of them are actually sorta being worked on today!
Any thoughts? Add this to list of external links at end of article?
IS the WMD link on this page a joke (as in, a reference to Iraq's WMD being fictional), or is it a serious link?
perfectblue 12:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I think there are 6 basic types of fictional technologies, but I would like peoples opinions, and possible referance materals. The types are as follows to me: General technology (advanced generally used technology) Secret technology (Technology developed in secret) Alien technology (Technology alien to the culture to who it is introduced.) Mad Science (See Mad scientist) Alchemy (Considers magic and science to be two parts of the one force) Magitech/Technomagic (Uses magic and technology together, but as seperate forces) Corrupt one 02:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I am interested in what is sometimes called Magitech or technomagic. Magitech is technology that uses magic, and technomagic is magic that is based on technology. I am interested in getting material about this. Corrupt one 02:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
This may be entirely OR. Needs sources. -- Lendorien 15:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
While I am not impressed with the current state of this article, and the question arises if this in the end wants to be a prose article or list article, I think it is a notable subject. Both Technology in science fiction and Technology in fiction link here. The latter might actually be the best, because broadest, title. Including those terms, we get secondary sources like the corresponding article in the Science Fiction Encyclopedia. @ Piotrus: Daranios ( talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus ( talk · contribs) on 25 November 2022. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just found this site last night: http://www.technovelgy.com/
It is amazing what a comprehensive collection of inventions and tech gadgetry that this website contains, referring to countless science fiction stories and author ideas... And how many of them are actually sorta being worked on today!
Any thoughts? Add this to list of external links at end of article?
IS the WMD link on this page a joke (as in, a reference to Iraq's WMD being fictional), or is it a serious link?
perfectblue 12:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I think there are 6 basic types of fictional technologies, but I would like peoples opinions, and possible referance materals. The types are as follows to me: General technology (advanced generally used technology) Secret technology (Technology developed in secret) Alien technology (Technology alien to the culture to who it is introduced.) Mad Science (See Mad scientist) Alchemy (Considers magic and science to be two parts of the one force) Magitech/Technomagic (Uses magic and technology together, but as seperate forces) Corrupt one 02:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I am interested in what is sometimes called Magitech or technomagic. Magitech is technology that uses magic, and technomagic is magic that is based on technology. I am interested in getting material about this. Corrupt one 02:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
This may be entirely OR. Needs sources. -- Lendorien 15:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
While I am not impressed with the current state of this article, and the question arises if this in the end wants to be a prose article or list article, I think it is a notable subject. Both Technology in science fiction and Technology in fiction link here. The latter might actually be the best, because broadest, title. Including those terms, we get secondary sources like the corresponding article in the Science Fiction Encyclopedia. @ Piotrus: Daranios ( talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)