![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with European Superstate on 26 July 2017. The result of the discussion was merge. |
![]() | On 30 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from European Federation to Federal Europe. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The link to the source of the George Washington quotation is broken and no such quote can be found at http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/ . Jaia ( talk) 08:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)jaia
In January, Vivianne Reding, has proposed the transformation of the EU into United States of Europe.-- 89.128.236.143 ( talk) 05:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I think the map is wrong as Russia is a possible member of the EU, so should be shaded green. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.196 ( talk) 09:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.83.137.87 ( talk) 13:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The section "small power" describes present day EU, not the subject of the article, which is about the United States of Europe being possible in the future. Anything in the section "predictions" should predict something. I haven't read the original source, but if its authors is drawing conclusions from the EU to any possible USE, it should be pointed out here as well. Otherwise I will delete the section. -- JakobvS ( talk) 11:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
United States of Europe. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I believe this article overlaps much with the European superstate page. I think they can be merged. I personally believe the term European Superstate is a more neutral term, but I am not super knowledgeable about the subject. It is clear that this page is more established. Thoughts? Oldag07 ( talk) 15:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD, I reverted an edit by User:זָרַח which reports the Daily Telegraph as saying "four advocates of European federalism were nominated to top posts in the EU". While there might be a case to include that statement in Federalisation of the European Union (where the assessment would still need to be corroborated by a more neutral source than DT), it seems to me to be a clear leap of imagination to suggest that it presages a US of E, and is thus WP:SYN in my opinion. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 09:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Though the pages ostensibly cover different topics, much of the content is actually the same.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.40.102 ( talk) 15:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
There is scope overlap to the point of WP:CFORK, the articles should either be merged or else be more closely, ahem, integrated with one another by WP:SS. -- dab (𒁳) 10:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Congress of Verona 1943
The first mention of a European Community I believe was in 1943 by the Italian Fascists at the Congress of Verona. The English text is here Also in 1943 The Italian Fascists proposed the creation of a 'European Community' free of British 'intrigues' at their Congress of Verona in their newly declared Salo Republic (Mussolini having been rescued from captivity). http://bibliotecafascista.blogspot.com/2012/03/the-manifesto-of-verona-1943.html. However Wikipedia won't allow me to publish as the source is Blogger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.200.177.1 ( talk) 17:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Many changes will need to be made, but I think the phrase "Federal Europe" is more commonly used than the "United States of Europe". PrecariousWorlds ( talk) 09:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn ( non-admin closure) ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
European Federation → European federation – Per WP:NCCAPS. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 19:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized by default; otherwise, words are not capitalized unless they would be so in running text.Which they would be and are in this case, as the examples cited by Digressivo show. -- 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
As long as no one has suggested any outcome besides not moving, the proposer of a move may withdraw their request. The closure should say that the request was withdrawn.@ Chipmunkdavis: unless you strikethrough your !vote, I don't think I'm able to withdraw the RM. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 18:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 02:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
European Federation → Federal Europe – See talkpage consensus at #Requested move 21 April 2024. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 16:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
working towards a federal Europe, expecting the target to be the federalisation article, but that's why we have hat notes. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 11:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with European Superstate on 26 July 2017. The result of the discussion was merge. |
![]() | On 30 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from European Federation to Federal Europe. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The link to the source of the George Washington quotation is broken and no such quote can be found at http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/ . Jaia ( talk) 08:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)jaia
In January, Vivianne Reding, has proposed the transformation of the EU into United States of Europe.-- 89.128.236.143 ( talk) 05:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I think the map is wrong as Russia is a possible member of the EU, so should be shaded green. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.196 ( talk) 09:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.83.137.87 ( talk) 13:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The section "small power" describes present day EU, not the subject of the article, which is about the United States of Europe being possible in the future. Anything in the section "predictions" should predict something. I haven't read the original source, but if its authors is drawing conclusions from the EU to any possible USE, it should be pointed out here as well. Otherwise I will delete the section. -- JakobvS ( talk) 11:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
United States of Europe. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I believe this article overlaps much with the European superstate page. I think they can be merged. I personally believe the term European Superstate is a more neutral term, but I am not super knowledgeable about the subject. It is clear that this page is more established. Thoughts? Oldag07 ( talk) 15:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD, I reverted an edit by User:זָרַח which reports the Daily Telegraph as saying "four advocates of European federalism were nominated to top posts in the EU". While there might be a case to include that statement in Federalisation of the European Union (where the assessment would still need to be corroborated by a more neutral source than DT), it seems to me to be a clear leap of imagination to suggest that it presages a US of E, and is thus WP:SYN in my opinion. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 09:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Though the pages ostensibly cover different topics, much of the content is actually the same.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.40.102 ( talk) 15:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
There is scope overlap to the point of WP:CFORK, the articles should either be merged or else be more closely, ahem, integrated with one another by WP:SS. -- dab (𒁳) 10:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Congress of Verona 1943
The first mention of a European Community I believe was in 1943 by the Italian Fascists at the Congress of Verona. The English text is here Also in 1943 The Italian Fascists proposed the creation of a 'European Community' free of British 'intrigues' at their Congress of Verona in their newly declared Salo Republic (Mussolini having been rescued from captivity). http://bibliotecafascista.blogspot.com/2012/03/the-manifesto-of-verona-1943.html. However Wikipedia won't allow me to publish as the source is Blogger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.200.177.1 ( talk) 17:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Many changes will need to be made, but I think the phrase "Federal Europe" is more commonly used than the "United States of Europe". PrecariousWorlds ( talk) 09:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: withdrawn ( non-admin closure) ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
European Federation → European federation – Per WP:NCCAPS. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 19:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized by default; otherwise, words are not capitalized unless they would be so in running text.Which they would be and are in this case, as the examples cited by Digressivo show. -- 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
As long as no one has suggested any outcome besides not moving, the proposer of a move may withdraw their request. The closure should say that the request was withdrawn.@ Chipmunkdavis: unless you strikethrough your !vote, I don't think I'm able to withdraw the RM. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 18:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 02:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
European Federation → Federal Europe – See talkpage consensus at #Requested move 21 April 2024. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 16:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
working towards a federal Europe, expecting the target to be the federalisation article, but that's why we have hat notes. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 11:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)