![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Do we include in biographies of living persons, including but not limited to Emma Watson, their listing within the Panama Papers if there is no supporting evidence of financial abuse or abuse of positions of power? 🖖 ATinySliver/ ATalkPage 20:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I think that the question should be revised, as it proposes to set up a simple rule, and to apply it across all biographies. The answer should be decided on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the particular person's situation, and the relevant guidelines. Please consider restricting the scope of the question to this particular article. Thank-you. -- IamNotU ( talk) 21:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
the Pentagon Papers... you must be an older person like me.
(Moved from above)
Being in the panana papers as a context of wrongdoing, avoiding taxes. What makes you think it doesn't suggest wrong doing? Do you just start from a null point of view? If so, then you must be persuade that the whole papers and media coverage were about avoiding taxes. Back up your "just words" air talk — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.95.33.74 (
talk)
05:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
~~~~
(four tildes) so the bot doesn't have to keep following you around.
This should, of course, be included. Come on, it's in Cameron's wiki even thought it was his father's offshore company. But people really think that it shouldn't be in Emma Watsons article? Well, there is no argument that there should be an entire section on Cameron's father's Panama Papers but not a single mention of Emma Watson buying a house with an offshore company. The only reason would be that Emma Watson is popular and Cameron is as popular as most politicians. -- Momo Monitor ( talk) 01:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand the argument that we have there has to be proof that there was wrongdoing. We aren't the investigators. We just include what the RS say. And there are a lot of RS on this topic out there. Its non inclusion is utterly arbitrary and POV pushing. - Xcuref1endx ( talk) 16:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This is the wrong question. I put my answer in "yes" and folk who support exactly the same position have answered "no". Because we care about reliable secondary sources. The question is not relevant to either the Cameron article or this one. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
20:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC).
I agree, this *is* the wrong question. The use of an offshore trust may indicate nothing more than good financial management, as the Panama Papers article has taken great care to underline. It is not up to us to decide wrongdoing. One of the questions is whether some of the things that are currently legal, should be legal, but I don't think anyone faults anyone who is taking advantage of a strategy that is legal to conserve their wealth. I suggest that the article mention that she has an offshore, per this leak, and then quote whatever she may have had to say about it. And leave it at that if there is no coverage of any investigation or other indication of tax evasion or other wrongdoing. WP:COMMONKNOWLEDGE is the guideline here imho. Elinruby ( talk) 17:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Why does ATinySliver keep deleting references to Emma Watson's being named in the Panama Papers? The only reason I can think of is that he/she has a personal interest, probably out of admiration, in protecting her reputation. Clearly, her being mentioned in the Panama Papers is notable; it's been written about in many major newspapers. This is an abuse of power on the part of ATinySliver. It's not your job to opine on whether her being named in the Panama Papers implies wrongdoing; let the readers make that conclusion on their own. Don't attempt to suppress information to protect the integrity of an actress that you like. ThisIsNotFair1993 ( talk) 18:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
If it says that Emma Watson is "British" then shouldnt the categories say? 21st-century British actresses, 1990 births, Actresses from Paris, Alumni of Worcester College, Oxford, Brown University alumni, British child actresses, British female models, British feminists, British film actresses, British television actresses, Living people, People educated at Headington School, Oxford, People educated at The Dragon School, People from Oxford & British Universalists Also shouldnt we add? British atheists
86.152.49.239 ( talk) 17:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
VarunFEB2003 (
talk)
13:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www10.nytimes.com/2005/11/17/movies/17pott.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there a compelling reason to include this in the article? I know she mentions it in the speech but giving this much attention to it when it's so irrelevant to the section/article left a bad taste in my mouth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.64.70.203 ( talk) 23:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Private photos of Emma Watson from a clothes fitting (not nude pictures) have been stolen. This tragedy happened a short period after she was criticized by "feminists" for exposing a part of her breast in Vanity Fair. In 2014 she was threatened with a leak of (non existing) nude pictures of her, right after she had spoken as a UN Ambassador for Women on gender equality. Emma Watson is taking legal action against this horrifying incident. [1]
References
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rævhuld ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
In 2017, private photos of Watson taken during a clothes fitting were stolen and made public. Lawyers were contacted, and a publicist offered no further comment.
Does this really warrant mention? It's hardly encyclopedic and seems like such a minor episode that it might be worth removing, especially if past dating history and other such information is typically excluded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaymondCHedges ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You need to add that Emma Watson is in the new live movie, Beauty and the beast. 75.111.17.201 ( talk) 00:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove Emma Watson from the Category: People with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( WP:BLP). 212.95.7.93 ( talk) 08:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories.ChamithN (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Later that year she starred she opposite Tom Hanks in the film adaptation of Dave Eggers's novel The Circle, playing Mae Holland, a young tech worker who takes a job at a powerful Internet corporation, only to find herself in a perilous situation concerning privacy, surveillance and freedom.[92] The film, directed by James Ponsoldt, was released on April 28, 2017 to negative reviews.
Currently ^ is the current iteration.
Mistake is in bold. Not sure what the editor intended for it, but it's clearly a mistake.
Sorry, first time creating a talk page, I'm sure I'm making a mistake in the etiquette of this.
The Prinz ( talk) 03:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
I recently came across a short film Watson played in, Hurdles. The film debuted in September 2016, Watson helped to narrate and produce. Hurdles addresses gender equality. At the very least, it should be included in the Women's rights work category, if not in the Filmography category as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvyFollowers8319 ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
EmmaWatsonNov2010.jpg Joreljr ( talk) 18:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please wikilink The Queen of the Tearling in the upcoming projects. – 2.247.246.3 ( talk) 21:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Emma Watson is dating Chord Overstreet, who was in Glee. They have been keeping it low until today March 9th, that they came out holding hands in Los Angeles. Jennsan900 ( talk) 20:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
"She was confused by the backlash" This is assertion or interpretation, lacking common sense or evidence. Her brisk retort is certainly not indicative of any confusion at all. The context indicates that the right term would be bemused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.223.16 ( talk) 11:36, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like her picture to be updated. The current picture is from 5 years ago, and she looks very different now. It would be great if the picture could be changed to a much more recent picture. ANDES27 ( talk) 22:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Was that really that necessary to include Razzies in the accolade section despite the fact that these type of awards are the least important and insignificant, and citing other articles such as Will Smith don't placed that award in the accolade section. Perhaps the type of ruling being applied onto the article of Will Smith's accolade section should be applied onto Emma Watson and other actors and actresses' accolade section as well. Pennyvas ( talk) 14:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
So it's a personal preference then, based on your statement and terms used to describe the awards? You'll have to do better than that. WP:OTHERSTUFF covers your second argument. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 06:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
As you can tell from my lack of knowledge, I have little or no opinion over Will Smith's awards. The only opinion regarding them I do have is that they shouldn't be used as a yardstick for inclusion (or exclusion) for other actors and actresses. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 17:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Once again, I refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFF. To save me having to link to it for a fourth time, do me a favour and read it, would you? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 08:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Emma has been described as a "British actress" in the article for the past few years. On 24th May, the editor Sellsomepapers changed this to "English actress" without discussion or reason. Subsequently other editors who have restored the original have been repeatedly reverted by one other editor. Can we get this fixed without an edit war? -- Tigranis ( talk) 07:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rubytuesday25 ( talk) 15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Remove the awards and nominations category and just add those to Emma Watson's filmography instead. I also want to add the nominations Emma Watson has had that aren't listed on her page. Rubytuesday25 ( talk) 15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Asdfghjkl9658 ( talk) 06:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
paige Watson was a indian officer born in 1955 , shulanka india she was an orphan who grow up in north shulanka orphanage she was an orphan that grow up and ran away with a famous singer Madonna and they were 6 as when they both ran away on a moving train between north and south shulanka she and her friend then sat on the roads collecting money off people and then they were 20 when they both left and got married to two indian men tutur and magari from west shullie india not so far away her first job was road work as she stayed with that job for about two or three years as she worn out of that job and turned into a officer as she stayed with that job and never left she is now famous for her act as an indian police officer an found her way to fame she went from indian orphan at shulanka or[hinage to famous indian officer now moved to shakago to present some secrets of her act —′ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.25.192 ( talk) 13:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
If it says that Emma Watson is "British" then shouldnt the categories say? 21st-century British actresses, 1990 births, Actresses from Paris, Alumni of Worcester College, Oxford, Brown University alumni, British child actresses, British female models, British feminists, British film actresses, British television actresses, Living people, People educated at Headington School, Oxford, People educated at The Dragon School, People from Oxford & British Universalists Also shouldnt we add? British atheists— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:50A7:B500:0:0:0:717C ( talk) 21:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
I've seen at least one semi-reliable source which states that she is a supermodel. I've searched Wikipedia and Wikidata for Emma Watson as a supermodel, but they returned nothing.
However, due to here status as a celebrity, doesn't that make her a supermodel? Since "supermodel" is defined as a celebrity model. Maybe she is not a supermodel because she didn't become a celebrity due to modeling. If it is determined that she is a supermodel, then that is something that should be in this article. -- User123o987name ( talk) 23:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Emma Watson turned 30 today and this picture is from 2013. We should consider updating the photo. Been looking around briefly but if anyone finds a picture that follows Wikipedia guidelines please update if possible TheWikiJedi ( talk) 23:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Is it me or is that the most un-Emma Watson photo of her? Looks like someone else to me. Govvy ( talk) 22:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The link to the Cinderella movie is to the 1950 version, instead of the 2015 version: Correct link: /info/en/?search=Cinderella_(2015_Disney_film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.220.219 ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X= an English actress Category:21st-century English actresse Category:English people of French descent Category:English Universalists Category:English activists Category:English child actresses Category:English expatriates in France Category:English female models Category:English feminists Category:English film actresses Category:English television actresses Category:English women activists Y= a British actress Category:21st-century British actresse Category:British people of French descent Category:British Universalists Category:British activists Category:British child actresses Category:British expatriates in France Category:British female models Category:British feminists Category:British film actresses Category:British television actresses Category:British women activists 81.101.15.25 ( talk) 19:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under Personal Life, ″Barack″ is incorrectly spelled.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
While the current infobox image for Watson depicts her promoting a relatively recent film work, it does seem a bit more low quality to me. I feel that the previous image used in 2013 is higher quality and depicts her profile more clearly, as infobox image's shouldn't solely be used for their recency. Thoughts?-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 05:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Somebody should probably put something up about the new developments in her dating life. Can't think of a cool username ( talk) 15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a34727655/emma-watson-leo-robinton-step-out-in-london 136.2.16.181 ( talk) 20:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
i see information about her name in the panama papers is hidden in the personal life section code. was there reasoning established for this? i think it should be included, alongside her representative statement that it was created to keep her address / personal info private at the time for stalking threats, etc.-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 01:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Asdfghjkl9658! I would like to discuss your recent additions to Watson's page. I noticed that you sought out to emphasize the following text: "I have met fans [with] my face tattooed on their bod[ies]. I've met people who used the Harry Potter books to get through cancer. I don't know how to explain it, but the Harry Potter phenomenon steps into a different zone" both through a quotebox and the formatting for a quote itself. I appreciate you reworking it so it doesn't align right under the image, but I do want to ask why you wish to emphasize the quote itself and how it serves to improve the biography? IMHO, it's an excessively lengthy quote or a standout definition regarding her public image and works better integrated into the body of the section, but of course, WP is a collaborative website. Thanks!-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 03:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I've changed my mind. You're right and I completely understand what you're saying and respect and appreciate what you do. Anyway, I just wanted to "show" a little bit of what might be great improvement in the future on articles like this one, as it is shown on other entertainers' articles. Thanks for the words. Asdfghjkl9658 ( talk) 04:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Due to the amount of reporting on her current relationship with Leo Robinton [1] [2] I considered including it in her biography - however, it occured to me that similar weight could be given to her past reported relationships, including William "Mack" Knight [3] Chord Overstreet [4] and Matthew Janney. [5] Obviously, the inclusion of this information can be considered both informative and tabloidic, depending on each view of what is and isn't encyclopedic. What are other editors thoughts on this matter?-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 04:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
References
Watson has a boyfriend [...] The Internet says he's called Mack, he's handsome, and he works in tech in Silicon Valley.)
After ending their notoriously private relationship in May of this year, new photos appear to confirm that Emma Watson and photographer Chord Overstreet have reconciled.
In January 2014, Emma and Matthew, who is a professional rugby player, confirmed their relationship. After a year, a source confirmed to Us Weekly the former flames had a mutual breakup.
Just curious. I came to this article because her name was in the news and I had no idea who she was.
She was born in France and therefore entitled to French citizenship. Her parents presumably had UK/British passports so she is British by citizenship and nationality.
She went to University at Browns, RI.
Is it that she identifies herself as English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selimap ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I was genuinely surprised that there is no mention of Emma Watson's recent expression of support for Palestine and the resulting accusations of "antisemitism" by several Israel politicians and diplomats. This seems an event of significance, newsworthiness and encyclopaedic value — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.163.59 ( talk) 19:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
It seems pretty standard that if a signature is available, then it's included in the article? WP:OTHERSTUFF notwithstanding, but many other articles seem to follow this precedent. Generally, sigs don't change much over years, and especially when there's nothing to back up a claim, there's no reason to assume that just because it's old, it's out of date? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 08:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In referencing the first Harry Potter film that Emma starred in, it was not Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone; instead, it was Sorcerer’s Stone. Cmccanless ( talk) 10:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to personal life:
"In May 2016, Watson's name appeared in the [Panama Papers]."
Begley, Sarah (May 11, 2016). "Emma Watson Admits to Offshore Company After Exposure in the Panama Papers". Time magazine. EJKAE31 ( talk) 10:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
People can now forge her signature which isn't right you should never have posted her signature it is rude and disrespectful 74.193.8.140 ( talk) 04:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2A00:23C7:9012:5501:D4DC:8D58:E986:5A0 ( talk) 19:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Emma Watson studied geography for A levels and received an A grade
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Last paragraph of “Activism” section, replace “environmental justice” with “sustainable fashion”
The reason: the reference used links to an article about how she work a sustainably made outfit to meet Al Gore, a prominent climate activist. Wearing sustainable outfits is not the same as environmental justice, which is the concept that those who bear the brunt of pollution should have the power and influence to reduce that pollution and live within a healthy environment. 75.168.94.15 ( talk) 04:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is a request to add the paragraph below to the Emma Watson page, either in the section “Activism and advocacy”, immediately AFTER the current second sentence (“In 2015, Malala Yousafzai told Watson she decided to call herself a feminist after hearing her speech.[157]”) or by creating a new section, “Critical reaction to feminist activism”.
The source I am citing and quoting is:
https://thecritic.co.uk/feminist-fallacies-men-can-be-feminists/ The author is journalist Julie Bindel.
My suggested addition is:
<Watson’s feminist activism has received criticism by radical feminists like Julie Bindel, who wrote: “ Watson’s call to men was less about demanding that they support women in our endeavours to end male violence and oppression of women than it was about her desperate attempt to prove that feminism is not synonymous with man-hating.”> Epsilon Moron ( talk) 01:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Do we include in biographies of living persons, including but not limited to Emma Watson, their listing within the Panama Papers if there is no supporting evidence of financial abuse or abuse of positions of power? 🖖 ATinySliver/ ATalkPage 20:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I think that the question should be revised, as it proposes to set up a simple rule, and to apply it across all biographies. The answer should be decided on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the particular person's situation, and the relevant guidelines. Please consider restricting the scope of the question to this particular article. Thank-you. -- IamNotU ( talk) 21:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
the Pentagon Papers... you must be an older person like me.
(Moved from above)
Being in the panana papers as a context of wrongdoing, avoiding taxes. What makes you think it doesn't suggest wrong doing? Do you just start from a null point of view? If so, then you must be persuade that the whole papers and media coverage were about avoiding taxes. Back up your "just words" air talk — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.95.33.74 (
talk)
05:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
~~~~
(four tildes) so the bot doesn't have to keep following you around.
This should, of course, be included. Come on, it's in Cameron's wiki even thought it was his father's offshore company. But people really think that it shouldn't be in Emma Watsons article? Well, there is no argument that there should be an entire section on Cameron's father's Panama Papers but not a single mention of Emma Watson buying a house with an offshore company. The only reason would be that Emma Watson is popular and Cameron is as popular as most politicians. -- Momo Monitor ( talk) 01:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand the argument that we have there has to be proof that there was wrongdoing. We aren't the investigators. We just include what the RS say. And there are a lot of RS on this topic out there. Its non inclusion is utterly arbitrary and POV pushing. - Xcuref1endx ( talk) 16:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This is the wrong question. I put my answer in "yes" and folk who support exactly the same position have answered "no". Because we care about reliable secondary sources. The question is not relevant to either the Cameron article or this one. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
20:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC).
I agree, this *is* the wrong question. The use of an offshore trust may indicate nothing more than good financial management, as the Panama Papers article has taken great care to underline. It is not up to us to decide wrongdoing. One of the questions is whether some of the things that are currently legal, should be legal, but I don't think anyone faults anyone who is taking advantage of a strategy that is legal to conserve their wealth. I suggest that the article mention that she has an offshore, per this leak, and then quote whatever she may have had to say about it. And leave it at that if there is no coverage of any investigation or other indication of tax evasion or other wrongdoing. WP:COMMONKNOWLEDGE is the guideline here imho. Elinruby ( talk) 17:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Why does ATinySliver keep deleting references to Emma Watson's being named in the Panama Papers? The only reason I can think of is that he/she has a personal interest, probably out of admiration, in protecting her reputation. Clearly, her being mentioned in the Panama Papers is notable; it's been written about in many major newspapers. This is an abuse of power on the part of ATinySliver. It's not your job to opine on whether her being named in the Panama Papers implies wrongdoing; let the readers make that conclusion on their own. Don't attempt to suppress information to protect the integrity of an actress that you like. ThisIsNotFair1993 ( talk) 18:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
If it says that Emma Watson is "British" then shouldnt the categories say? 21st-century British actresses, 1990 births, Actresses from Paris, Alumni of Worcester College, Oxford, Brown University alumni, British child actresses, British female models, British feminists, British film actresses, British television actresses, Living people, People educated at Headington School, Oxford, People educated at The Dragon School, People from Oxford & British Universalists Also shouldnt we add? British atheists
86.152.49.239 ( talk) 17:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
VarunFEB2003 (
talk)
13:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www10.nytimes.com/2005/11/17/movies/17pott.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there a compelling reason to include this in the article? I know she mentions it in the speech but giving this much attention to it when it's so irrelevant to the section/article left a bad taste in my mouth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.64.70.203 ( talk) 23:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Private photos of Emma Watson from a clothes fitting (not nude pictures) have been stolen. This tragedy happened a short period after she was criticized by "feminists" for exposing a part of her breast in Vanity Fair. In 2014 she was threatened with a leak of (non existing) nude pictures of her, right after she had spoken as a UN Ambassador for Women on gender equality. Emma Watson is taking legal action against this horrifying incident. [1]
References
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rævhuld ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
In 2017, private photos of Watson taken during a clothes fitting were stolen and made public. Lawyers were contacted, and a publicist offered no further comment.
Does this really warrant mention? It's hardly encyclopedic and seems like such a minor episode that it might be worth removing, especially if past dating history and other such information is typically excluded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaymondCHedges ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You need to add that Emma Watson is in the new live movie, Beauty and the beast. 75.111.17.201 ( talk) 00:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove Emma Watson from the Category: People with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( WP:BLP). 212.95.7.93 ( talk) 08:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories.ChamithN (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Later that year she starred she opposite Tom Hanks in the film adaptation of Dave Eggers's novel The Circle, playing Mae Holland, a young tech worker who takes a job at a powerful Internet corporation, only to find herself in a perilous situation concerning privacy, surveillance and freedom.[92] The film, directed by James Ponsoldt, was released on April 28, 2017 to negative reviews.
Currently ^ is the current iteration.
Mistake is in bold. Not sure what the editor intended for it, but it's clearly a mistake.
Sorry, first time creating a talk page, I'm sure I'm making a mistake in the etiquette of this.
The Prinz ( talk) 03:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
I recently came across a short film Watson played in, Hurdles. The film debuted in September 2016, Watson helped to narrate and produce. Hurdles addresses gender equality. At the very least, it should be included in the Women's rights work category, if not in the Filmography category as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvyFollowers8319 ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
EmmaWatsonNov2010.jpg Joreljr ( talk) 18:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please wikilink The Queen of the Tearling in the upcoming projects. – 2.247.246.3 ( talk) 21:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emma Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Emma Watson is dating Chord Overstreet, who was in Glee. They have been keeping it low until today March 9th, that they came out holding hands in Los Angeles. Jennsan900 ( talk) 20:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
"She was confused by the backlash" This is assertion or interpretation, lacking common sense or evidence. Her brisk retort is certainly not indicative of any confusion at all. The context indicates that the right term would be bemused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.223.16 ( talk) 11:36, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like her picture to be updated. The current picture is from 5 years ago, and she looks very different now. It would be great if the picture could be changed to a much more recent picture. ANDES27 ( talk) 22:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Was that really that necessary to include Razzies in the accolade section despite the fact that these type of awards are the least important and insignificant, and citing other articles such as Will Smith don't placed that award in the accolade section. Perhaps the type of ruling being applied onto the article of Will Smith's accolade section should be applied onto Emma Watson and other actors and actresses' accolade section as well. Pennyvas ( talk) 14:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
So it's a personal preference then, based on your statement and terms used to describe the awards? You'll have to do better than that. WP:OTHERSTUFF covers your second argument. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 06:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
As you can tell from my lack of knowledge, I have little or no opinion over Will Smith's awards. The only opinion regarding them I do have is that they shouldn't be used as a yardstick for inclusion (or exclusion) for other actors and actresses. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 17:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Once again, I refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFF. To save me having to link to it for a fourth time, do me a favour and read it, would you? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 08:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Emma has been described as a "British actress" in the article for the past few years. On 24th May, the editor Sellsomepapers changed this to "English actress" without discussion or reason. Subsequently other editors who have restored the original have been repeatedly reverted by one other editor. Can we get this fixed without an edit war? -- Tigranis ( talk) 07:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rubytuesday25 ( talk) 15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Remove the awards and nominations category and just add those to Emma Watson's filmography instead. I also want to add the nominations Emma Watson has had that aren't listed on her page. Rubytuesday25 ( talk) 15:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Asdfghjkl9658 ( talk) 06:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
paige Watson was a indian officer born in 1955 , shulanka india she was an orphan who grow up in north shulanka orphanage she was an orphan that grow up and ran away with a famous singer Madonna and they were 6 as when they both ran away on a moving train between north and south shulanka she and her friend then sat on the roads collecting money off people and then they were 20 when they both left and got married to two indian men tutur and magari from west shullie india not so far away her first job was road work as she stayed with that job for about two or three years as she worn out of that job and turned into a officer as she stayed with that job and never left she is now famous for her act as an indian police officer an found her way to fame she went from indian orphan at shulanka or[hinage to famous indian officer now moved to shakago to present some secrets of her act —′ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.25.192 ( talk) 13:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
If it says that Emma Watson is "British" then shouldnt the categories say? 21st-century British actresses, 1990 births, Actresses from Paris, Alumni of Worcester College, Oxford, Brown University alumni, British child actresses, British female models, British feminists, British film actresses, British television actresses, Living people, People educated at Headington School, Oxford, People educated at The Dragon School, People from Oxford & British Universalists Also shouldnt we add? British atheists— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:50A7:B500:0:0:0:717C ( talk) 21:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
I've seen at least one semi-reliable source which states that she is a supermodel. I've searched Wikipedia and Wikidata for Emma Watson as a supermodel, but they returned nothing.
However, due to here status as a celebrity, doesn't that make her a supermodel? Since "supermodel" is defined as a celebrity model. Maybe she is not a supermodel because she didn't become a celebrity due to modeling. If it is determined that she is a supermodel, then that is something that should be in this article. -- User123o987name ( talk) 23:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Emma Watson turned 30 today and this picture is from 2013. We should consider updating the photo. Been looking around briefly but if anyone finds a picture that follows Wikipedia guidelines please update if possible TheWikiJedi ( talk) 23:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Is it me or is that the most un-Emma Watson photo of her? Looks like someone else to me. Govvy ( talk) 22:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The link to the Cinderella movie is to the 1950 version, instead of the 2015 version: Correct link: /info/en/?search=Cinderella_(2015_Disney_film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.220.219 ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X= an English actress Category:21st-century English actresse Category:English people of French descent Category:English Universalists Category:English activists Category:English child actresses Category:English expatriates in France Category:English female models Category:English feminists Category:English film actresses Category:English television actresses Category:English women activists Y= a British actress Category:21st-century British actresse Category:British people of French descent Category:British Universalists Category:British activists Category:British child actresses Category:British expatriates in France Category:British female models Category:British feminists Category:British film actresses Category:British television actresses Category:British women activists 81.101.15.25 ( talk) 19:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under Personal Life, ″Barack″ is incorrectly spelled.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
While the current infobox image for Watson depicts her promoting a relatively recent film work, it does seem a bit more low quality to me. I feel that the previous image used in 2013 is higher quality and depicts her profile more clearly, as infobox image's shouldn't solely be used for their recency. Thoughts?-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 05:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Somebody should probably put something up about the new developments in her dating life. Can't think of a cool username ( talk) 15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a34727655/emma-watson-leo-robinton-step-out-in-london 136.2.16.181 ( talk) 20:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
i see information about her name in the panama papers is hidden in the personal life section code. was there reasoning established for this? i think it should be included, alongside her representative statement that it was created to keep her address / personal info private at the time for stalking threats, etc.-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 01:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Asdfghjkl9658! I would like to discuss your recent additions to Watson's page. I noticed that you sought out to emphasize the following text: "I have met fans [with] my face tattooed on their bod[ies]. I've met people who used the Harry Potter books to get through cancer. I don't know how to explain it, but the Harry Potter phenomenon steps into a different zone" both through a quotebox and the formatting for a quote itself. I appreciate you reworking it so it doesn't align right under the image, but I do want to ask why you wish to emphasize the quote itself and how it serves to improve the biography? IMHO, it's an excessively lengthy quote or a standout definition regarding her public image and works better integrated into the body of the section, but of course, WP is a collaborative website. Thanks!-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 03:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I've changed my mind. You're right and I completely understand what you're saying and respect and appreciate what you do. Anyway, I just wanted to "show" a little bit of what might be great improvement in the future on articles like this one, as it is shown on other entertainers' articles. Thanks for the words. Asdfghjkl9658 ( talk) 04:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Due to the amount of reporting on her current relationship with Leo Robinton [1] [2] I considered including it in her biography - however, it occured to me that similar weight could be given to her past reported relationships, including William "Mack" Knight [3] Chord Overstreet [4] and Matthew Janney. [5] Obviously, the inclusion of this information can be considered both informative and tabloidic, depending on each view of what is and isn't encyclopedic. What are other editors thoughts on this matter?-- Bettydaisies ( talk) 04:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
References
Watson has a boyfriend [...] The Internet says he's called Mack, he's handsome, and he works in tech in Silicon Valley.)
After ending their notoriously private relationship in May of this year, new photos appear to confirm that Emma Watson and photographer Chord Overstreet have reconciled.
In January 2014, Emma and Matthew, who is a professional rugby player, confirmed their relationship. After a year, a source confirmed to Us Weekly the former flames had a mutual breakup.
Just curious. I came to this article because her name was in the news and I had no idea who she was.
She was born in France and therefore entitled to French citizenship. Her parents presumably had UK/British passports so she is British by citizenship and nationality.
She went to University at Browns, RI.
Is it that she identifies herself as English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selimap ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I was genuinely surprised that there is no mention of Emma Watson's recent expression of support for Palestine and the resulting accusations of "antisemitism" by several Israel politicians and diplomats. This seems an event of significance, newsworthiness and encyclopaedic value — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.163.59 ( talk) 19:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
It seems pretty standard that if a signature is available, then it's included in the article? WP:OTHERSTUFF notwithstanding, but many other articles seem to follow this precedent. Generally, sigs don't change much over years, and especially when there's nothing to back up a claim, there's no reason to assume that just because it's old, it's out of date? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 08:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In referencing the first Harry Potter film that Emma starred in, it was not Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone; instead, it was Sorcerer’s Stone. Cmccanless ( talk) 10:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to personal life:
"In May 2016, Watson's name appeared in the [Panama Papers]."
Begley, Sarah (May 11, 2016). "Emma Watson Admits to Offshore Company After Exposure in the Panama Papers". Time magazine. EJKAE31 ( talk) 10:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
People can now forge her signature which isn't right you should never have posted her signature it is rude and disrespectful 74.193.8.140 ( talk) 04:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2A00:23C7:9012:5501:D4DC:8D58:E986:5A0 ( talk) 19:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Emma Watson studied geography for A levels and received an A grade
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Last paragraph of “Activism” section, replace “environmental justice” with “sustainable fashion”
The reason: the reference used links to an article about how she work a sustainably made outfit to meet Al Gore, a prominent climate activist. Wearing sustainable outfits is not the same as environmental justice, which is the concept that those who bear the brunt of pollution should have the power and influence to reduce that pollution and live within a healthy environment. 75.168.94.15 ( talk) 04:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Emma Watson has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is a request to add the paragraph below to the Emma Watson page, either in the section “Activism and advocacy”, immediately AFTER the current second sentence (“In 2015, Malala Yousafzai told Watson she decided to call herself a feminist after hearing her speech.[157]”) or by creating a new section, “Critical reaction to feminist activism”.
The source I am citing and quoting is:
https://thecritic.co.uk/feminist-fallacies-men-can-be-feminists/ The author is journalist Julie Bindel.
My suggested addition is:
<Watson’s feminist activism has received criticism by radical feminists like Julie Bindel, who wrote: “ Watson’s call to men was less about demanding that they support women in our endeavours to end male violence and oppression of women than it was about her desperate attempt to prove that feminism is not synonymous with man-hating.”> Epsilon Moron ( talk) 01:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)