![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
11 Times Square, this is in new york
—{{subst:Adam Busbin}}
A spam edit added a lot of info and in a rare event even bare url references but removed some old info and messed up the format. It needed work anyway. B137 ( talk) 23:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
I know there is sort of a convention that when a building is on a "list of tallest" list (and so many of these have been conformed to meet a standardized "featured" format that includes all buildings having an article) to name where it ranks on the list in its individual article, just like how some of the tallest in a city list will mention their national or world ranking. However, these tend to be inaccurate as they are so often out of date. Before I fixed the spam, this article still said it was the 88th-tallest in the city, when it now is apparently the 100th; at what point does this ranking become trite? B137 ( talk) 16:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
11 Times Square, this is in new york
—{{subst:Adam Busbin}}
A spam edit added a lot of info and in a rare event even bare url references but removed some old info and messed up the format. It needed work anyway. B137 ( talk) 23:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
I know there is sort of a convention that when a building is on a "list of tallest" list (and so many of these have been conformed to meet a standardized "featured" format that includes all buildings having an article) to name where it ranks on the list in its individual article, just like how some of the tallest in a city list will mention their national or world ranking. However, these tend to be inaccurate as they are so often out of date. Before I fixed the spam, this article still said it was the 88th-tallest in the city, when it now is apparently the 100th; at what point does this ranking become trite? B137 ( talk) 16:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)