![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This film was not a "critical and commercial success" and the new york times did not describe it as "laugh-tastic"
the film has a score of 2.2 on the IMDB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.216.120 ( talk) 11:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
"An anonymous consensus has concluded that the "film" is the worst artistic accomplishment of modernity." This doesn't even have a link to a Geocities website with this claim, I'm removing it. 24.60.201.10 ( talk) 20:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Nardog, can you review these diffs?
I can delete the TfD stuff, but I'm not sure if you're saying that the post-safesubst code is acceptable or can be avoided? Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 21:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Try previewing the diff of {{subst:Rotten Tomatoes prose/sandbox|88|7.30|274}}
.
One puts safesubst in the template to be substed like
this, not in an article, or otherwise there's no difference from the usual subst
. I didn't make changes to the live template, and, as I said, you don't have to save your edit to see the effect, let alone in the main namespace. See
what I added at the TfD.
Nardog (
talk) 00:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This film was not a "critical and commercial success" and the new york times did not describe it as "laugh-tastic"
the film has a score of 2.2 on the IMDB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.216.120 ( talk) 11:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
"An anonymous consensus has concluded that the "film" is the worst artistic accomplishment of modernity." This doesn't even have a link to a Geocities website with this claim, I'm removing it. 24.60.201.10 ( talk) 20:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Nardog, can you review these diffs?
I can delete the TfD stuff, but I'm not sure if you're saying that the post-safesubst code is acceptable or can be avoided? Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 21:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Try previewing the diff of {{subst:Rotten Tomatoes prose/sandbox|88|7.30|274}}
.
One puts safesubst in the template to be substed like
this, not in an article, or otherwise there's no difference from the usual subst
. I didn't make changes to the live template, and, as I said, you don't have to save your edit to see the effect, let alone in the main namespace. See
what I added at the TfD.
Nardog (
talk) 00:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)