![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was No consensus for move; also, no particularly strong arguments or sources were presented to justify the move. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
EPA (disambiguation) → EPA — EPA is important enough to be a primary dab page. — -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 01:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.The result of the move request was: not moved. The concerns about systemic bias are important and should be taken into consideration, but it seems the U.S. agency is overwhelmingly the primary topic for this acronym. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 17:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
EPA (disambiguation) → EPA – EPA is currently is a redir to the US EPA. As seen from the dab page there are numerous uses for EPA so the US EPA may not be the primary use for WP readers. Also, to have it directed to the US organisation creates systemic bias. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 22:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
These are not the page view stats of all potential uses of EPA (see EPA (disambiguation)), but I think it's a fair sampling which clearly indicates the U.S. EPA clearly meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 23:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
I added the {{ globalise}} to the article because EPA {which is a redir to the US EPA) should be the dab page rather than EPA (disambiguation). -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 04:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was No consensus for move; also, no particularly strong arguments or sources were presented to justify the move. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
EPA (disambiguation) → EPA — EPA is important enough to be a primary dab page. — -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 01:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.The result of the move request was: not moved. The concerns about systemic bias are important and should be taken into consideration, but it seems the U.S. agency is overwhelmingly the primary topic for this acronym. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 17:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
EPA (disambiguation) → EPA – EPA is currently is a redir to the US EPA. As seen from the dab page there are numerous uses for EPA so the US EPA may not be the primary use for WP readers. Also, to have it directed to the US organisation creates systemic bias. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 22:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
These are not the page view stats of all potential uses of EPA (see EPA (disambiguation)), but I think it's a fair sampling which clearly indicates the U.S. EPA clearly meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 23:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
I added the {{ globalise}} to the article because EPA {which is a redir to the US EPA) should be the dab page rather than EPA (disambiguation). -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 04:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)