![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Destroying malignant dream characters Djatafie ( talk) 23:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
This article should definitely be deleted. Not only is the topic not notable enough to warrant it's own article, but the article itself is lacking. Perhaps it could be merged, but I think deletion is best. 2600:4040:A4B9:E000:CD4E:F439:6A11:EFF1 ( talk) 03:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
While most dream characters resemble humans, there can also be also other entities (like animals or robots) capable of speech etc. In fiction these would also be called characters, so I suppose that the term "dream character" should include them too. Psychonaut Wiki defines them as "inhabitants of the setting of almost any dream which can be spoken to and communicated with in extreme amounts of detail". In case the term "human-like" refers to cognitive/communicative abilities rather than visual appearance, I suggest replacing it with a less ambiguous formulation.
C. Scheler ( talk) 12:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Destroying malignant dream characters Djatafie ( talk) 23:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
This article should definitely be deleted. Not only is the topic not notable enough to warrant it's own article, but the article itself is lacking. Perhaps it could be merged, but I think deletion is best. 2600:4040:A4B9:E000:CD4E:F439:6A11:EFF1 ( talk) 03:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
While most dream characters resemble humans, there can also be also other entities (like animals or robots) capable of speech etc. In fiction these would also be called characters, so I suppose that the term "dream character" should include them too. Psychonaut Wiki defines them as "inhabitants of the setting of almost any dream which can be spoken to and communicated with in extreme amounts of detail". In case the term "human-like" refers to cognitive/communicative abilities rather than visual appearance, I suggest replacing it with a less ambiguous formulation.
C. Scheler ( talk) 12:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)