This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Deborah Lipstadt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The text now under
§ Commentary contains multiple statements that appear to be users' own
interpretation or evaluation of Lipstadt's remarks, such as ...
Which independent, published sources
directly support these characterizations? Note also that interviews and contemporary or breaking-news reports are
normally considered primary sources, whereas Wikipedia articles, and especially BLPs, should be based largely on reliable, secondary sources. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Lipstadt warned...Along the same lines...Lipstadt attacked...She rebuked...rejected the view...returned to the theme...
[C]ontemporary news reporting is not primary - it becomes primary as we become more distant– please cite any published expert or piece of Wikipedia guidance suggesting that sources somehow magically go from being secondary to primary ones. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 08:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The Career section is currently one sentence and needs expansion. Here are some basic sources: [1], [2], [3]. -- Softlavender ( talk) 02:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
On the 16th of november I added the innocent word „a selection" to the then called section works, knowing that Lipstadt wrote many more books than the mentioned four. She also wrote many articles in journals. The user softlavender reverted my edit at once and made an editwar in this cause. [4], [5], [6]. He claimed that Lipstadt did not write more than four books. I gave up my attempt to improve the biography of in this minor matter. Today I found the replacement of bibliography with the word books through another author, which I appreciate in principle, because a deficient list of books is no bibliography. [7] Today I added my words „a selection". But we have the problem, that all journal articles are missing. Could we get back to to the designation „works (a selection)" It is quite difficult to add only two simple words to your wikipedia for a foreigner and - in the field of history - quite expierienced user. -- Orik ( talk) 16:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't get how and why she is treated as some authority on "the Holocaust" given her multiple conflicts of interest in the matter. Could somebody explain why this isn't thoroughly reflected in the article? -- 105.8.6.224 ( talk) 22:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
A recent (April 2022) article containing much material not already in the current WP article, including detail on Lipstadt beliefs about antisemitism and how they evolved: JewishCurrents - Mari Cohen - Deborah Lipstadt vs. “The Oldest Hatred”, 28 April 2022: In her new role as antisemitism envoy, Deborah Lipstadt will attempt to fight a scourge of antisemitism that she seems to regard as incurable. ← ZScarpia 11:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Anyone able to tell me clearly how her last name is pronounced? Iljhgtn ( talk) 19:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The current infobox photo ( c:File:Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. Special Envoy.jpg) is extremely hard on the eyes due to her outfit clashing with this background; it's basically creating an optical illusion, and it is quite straining to look at. Perhaps an image like c:File:S20230130CS-0246 (52865348805) (cropped).jpg or c:File:File:U.S. Embassy Jerusalem celebrates the 246th U.S. Independence Day. July 5, 2022 09 (cropped).jpg would be preferable? Curbon7 ( talk) 08:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Deborah Lipstadt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The text now under
§ Commentary contains multiple statements that appear to be users' own
interpretation or evaluation of Lipstadt's remarks, such as ...
Which independent, published sources
directly support these characterizations? Note also that interviews and contemporary or breaking-news reports are
normally considered primary sources, whereas Wikipedia articles, and especially BLPs, should be based largely on reliable, secondary sources. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Lipstadt warned...Along the same lines...Lipstadt attacked...She rebuked...rejected the view...returned to the theme...
[C]ontemporary news reporting is not primary - it becomes primary as we become more distant– please cite any published expert or piece of Wikipedia guidance suggesting that sources somehow magically go from being secondary to primary ones. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 08:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The Career section is currently one sentence and needs expansion. Here are some basic sources: [1], [2], [3]. -- Softlavender ( talk) 02:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
On the 16th of november I added the innocent word „a selection" to the then called section works, knowing that Lipstadt wrote many more books than the mentioned four. She also wrote many articles in journals. The user softlavender reverted my edit at once and made an editwar in this cause. [4], [5], [6]. He claimed that Lipstadt did not write more than four books. I gave up my attempt to improve the biography of in this minor matter. Today I found the replacement of bibliography with the word books through another author, which I appreciate in principle, because a deficient list of books is no bibliography. [7] Today I added my words „a selection". But we have the problem, that all journal articles are missing. Could we get back to to the designation „works (a selection)" It is quite difficult to add only two simple words to your wikipedia for a foreigner and - in the field of history - quite expierienced user. -- Orik ( talk) 16:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't get how and why she is treated as some authority on "the Holocaust" given her multiple conflicts of interest in the matter. Could somebody explain why this isn't thoroughly reflected in the article? -- 105.8.6.224 ( talk) 22:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
A recent (April 2022) article containing much material not already in the current WP article, including detail on Lipstadt beliefs about antisemitism and how they evolved: JewishCurrents - Mari Cohen - Deborah Lipstadt vs. “The Oldest Hatred”, 28 April 2022: In her new role as antisemitism envoy, Deborah Lipstadt will attempt to fight a scourge of antisemitism that she seems to regard as incurable. ← ZScarpia 11:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Anyone able to tell me clearly how her last name is pronounced? Iljhgtn ( talk) 19:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The current infobox photo ( c:File:Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. Special Envoy.jpg) is extremely hard on the eyes due to her outfit clashing with this background; it's basically creating an optical illusion, and it is quite straining to look at. Perhaps an image like c:File:S20230130CS-0246 (52865348805) (cropped).jpg or c:File:File:U.S. Embassy Jerusalem celebrates the 246th U.S. Independence Day. July 5, 2022 09 (cropped).jpg would be preferable? Curbon7 ( talk) 08:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)