This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Death of Wishma Sandamali appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
11:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by Nardog ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC).
Hi Nardog some thoughts on the article that I couldn't fix on my own:
This was despite a 2008 directive from Japan's Immigration Bureau (later Immigration Services Agency) to its facilities to treat domestic violence victims with appropriate care and possibly grant them residencyAccording to the (Google translated) source, it seems like there might have been a possibility that this happened, or at least, it seems that the source hedges this point. Could you double check the source and confirm that?
Although her blood pressure and pulse had been undetectable since the morning of March 5, an ambulance was not called until 2:15 pm on March 6The source is paid, so I cannot access the full timeline. I'm confused about how this relates to the sentence immediately before it which implies that she was found unresponsive on March 6. How is it known that her pulse and blood pressure were undetectable on the 5th?
— Wug· a·po·des 03:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
入管庁幹部は国会答弁で、警察から入管にウィシュマさんを引き受けた際、DV被害者であることを認識していたが、DV被害者として対応はしていなかったと認めた). What the source isn't definitive about is whether her visa could have been renewed according to the protocols, I assume because the directive specifies the condition for granting residency to be spousal abuse, which indicates the marital status could have mattered.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Death of Wishma Sandamali appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
11:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by Nardog ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC).
Hi Nardog some thoughts on the article that I couldn't fix on my own:
This was despite a 2008 directive from Japan's Immigration Bureau (later Immigration Services Agency) to its facilities to treat domestic violence victims with appropriate care and possibly grant them residencyAccording to the (Google translated) source, it seems like there might have been a possibility that this happened, or at least, it seems that the source hedges this point. Could you double check the source and confirm that?
Although her blood pressure and pulse had been undetectable since the morning of March 5, an ambulance was not called until 2:15 pm on March 6The source is paid, so I cannot access the full timeline. I'm confused about how this relates to the sentence immediately before it which implies that she was found unresponsive on March 6. How is it known that her pulse and blood pressure were undetectable on the 5th?
— Wug· a·po·des 03:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
入管庁幹部は国会答弁で、警察から入管にウィシュマさんを引き受けた際、DV被害者であることを認識していたが、DV被害者として対応はしていなかったと認めた). What the source isn't definitive about is whether her visa could have been renewed according to the protocols, I assume because the directive specifies the condition for granting residency to be spousal abuse, which indicates the marital status could have mattered.