This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-07-22. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2012. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
If you wrote and researched with the founders of NLP and co-wrote one of the most important books on NLP (Frogs Into Princes), than you are a very important person in NLP. Thus Connirae Andreas is a VIP in NLP. So there's no reason to mark this page for speedy deletion, nor for deletion at all. And what annoys me above all things, is that the person that added the deletion-template, did not even explain why he/she didn't estimate Andreas... Davin7 12:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
This article has been tagged with the self-published tag since 2007:
![]() | This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to
self-published sources. (July 2007) |
but the above discussion about notability appears to establish the books as not being the sort of self published material that is not considered a reliable source. Does anyone object to having the tag removed? Guy Macon 01:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
This article was created in July 2007, well before the new rules for articles created after March 2010. I have replaced the template with a more accurate one.
Most of the potential sources that I have located are available in hardcopy only, so will have to be ordered from library or bookstore. Chelmian ( talk) 12:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I am pulling this discussion into the talk page as @ Iskandar323: and I have a different opinion as to whether or not this statement that I added as an award should be in here, and how it should be cited.
Per WP:PROF "For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgement of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source."
Hence, I think that using the association as a source is acceptable.
References
DaffodilOcean ( talk) 15:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-07-22. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2012. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
If you wrote and researched with the founders of NLP and co-wrote one of the most important books on NLP (Frogs Into Princes), than you are a very important person in NLP. Thus Connirae Andreas is a VIP in NLP. So there's no reason to mark this page for speedy deletion, nor for deletion at all. And what annoys me above all things, is that the person that added the deletion-template, did not even explain why he/she didn't estimate Andreas... Davin7 12:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
This article has been tagged with the self-published tag since 2007:
![]() | This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to
self-published sources. (July 2007) |
but the above discussion about notability appears to establish the books as not being the sort of self published material that is not considered a reliable source. Does anyone object to having the tag removed? Guy Macon 01:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
This article was created in July 2007, well before the new rules for articles created after March 2010. I have replaced the template with a more accurate one.
Most of the potential sources that I have located are available in hardcopy only, so will have to be ordered from library or bookstore. Chelmian ( talk) 12:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I am pulling this discussion into the talk page as @ Iskandar323: and I have a different opinion as to whether or not this statement that I added as an award should be in here, and how it should be cited.
Per WP:PROF "For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgement of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source."
Hence, I think that using the association as a source is acceptable.
References
DaffodilOcean ( talk) 15:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)