Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Will just copy what I put on the talk page a month ago.
I see this failing the focus criteria. The History section only mentions colleges or universities briefly in the very last sentence, why is there a whole section dedicated to an obscure American frat boy ritual, the technology section, and most of the others, do not relate to the topic of the article. To be honest the only section that is really relevant is the Professor-student relationships, most of the rest applies to any dating among young adults. Other issues are the headers not being particularly useful and the description of hooking up as a phenomena. Broadness (tricky to judge as there is no definition given on what this article covers, it appears to be a hodgepodge of various dating customs) could be a concern too as it seems very American centric. There should be at least some mention of the culture of college life to differentiate it from dating in other environments. There is probably more as this is quite a superficial review, but the lack of focus is enough to reassess this article.
I see focus as the big GA concern. If that is addressed then I will look at the other aspects more closely. AIRcorn (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Delisting Concerns remain and confirmed by another editor. AIRcorn (talk) 08:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Will just copy what I put on the talk page a month ago.
I see this failing the focus criteria. The History section only mentions colleges or universities briefly in the very last sentence, why is there a whole section dedicated to an obscure American frat boy ritual, the technology section, and most of the others, do not relate to the topic of the article. To be honest the only section that is really relevant is the Professor-student relationships, most of the rest applies to any dating among young adults. Other issues are the headers not being particularly useful and the description of hooking up as a phenomena. Broadness (tricky to judge as there is no definition given on what this article covers, it appears to be a hodgepodge of various dating customs) could be a concern too as it seems very American centric. There should be at least some mention of the culture of college life to differentiate it from dating in other environments. There is probably more as this is quite a superficial review, but the lack of focus is enough to reassess this article.
I see focus as the big GA concern. If that is addressed then I will look at the other aspects more closely. AIRcorn (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Delisting Concerns remain and confirmed by another editor. AIRcorn (talk) 08:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)