This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cinelerra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone gotten Cinelerra to work on OS X, BSD, or any other Unix-like OS? Blackcats 06:36, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Video Editing 101 with Cinelerra seems to be dead so I removed it from the article. - Srx 13:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I can't help but think that the withdrawal of Broadcast 2000 was just simply because it was superseded by Cinelerra; much of Broadcast 2000's user interface style carried over to Cinelerra. The RIAA bit was just a bit of sarcasm - after all, Cinelerra can do anything Broadcast 2000 could do, and a whole lot more. - rjp
I don't think the history section is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Any comments? Spandrawn ( talk) 22:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Our heroine seems to be missing in action as of now 78.27.66.184 ( talk) 06:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
This edit made the article internally inconsistent, using the terms "Linux" and "GNU/Linux" interchangeably. This is confusing; we should use one or the other. It also reversed some noncontroversial copyedits. It should be reverted. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This article reads like an advertisement, and Cinelerra is not by any means "professional". Please delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.196.68 ( talk) 17:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The manual link is dead. An updated list of manuals in various languages can be found here: http://cinelerra.org/docs.php
Sorry, I don't want to edit (break) the main page to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.7.187 ( talk) 20:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Can someone elaborate WHY the rewrite? Y23 ( talk) 16:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The article has been tagged for notability and sourcing issues again. Of the references provided, only that from digitalcontentproducer.com appears to be a reliable source. The rest are from the official websites of either Cinelerra or Lumiera, or slashdot, all of which are considered primary sources or otherwise dont meet guidelines reliable sources and insufficient to establish notability. If references demonstrating significant coverage in 3rd party sources cant be located and used to update the article soon , it will be nominated for deletion. Also I notice some involved directly in development of this software are participating, please take a moment to read WP:COI as is advised above.-- RadioFan ( talk) 20:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
There is no mention at all of the distributed rendering capabilities. KenSharp ( talk) 05:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
See Talk:OpenShot Video Editor#Linux-only User:ScotXW t@lk 16:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cinelerra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cinelerra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone gotten Cinelerra to work on OS X, BSD, or any other Unix-like OS? Blackcats 06:36, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Video Editing 101 with Cinelerra seems to be dead so I removed it from the article. - Srx 13:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I can't help but think that the withdrawal of Broadcast 2000 was just simply because it was superseded by Cinelerra; much of Broadcast 2000's user interface style carried over to Cinelerra. The RIAA bit was just a bit of sarcasm - after all, Cinelerra can do anything Broadcast 2000 could do, and a whole lot more. - rjp
I don't think the history section is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Any comments? Spandrawn ( talk) 22:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Our heroine seems to be missing in action as of now 78.27.66.184 ( talk) 06:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
This edit made the article internally inconsistent, using the terms "Linux" and "GNU/Linux" interchangeably. This is confusing; we should use one or the other. It also reversed some noncontroversial copyedits. It should be reverted. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This article reads like an advertisement, and Cinelerra is not by any means "professional". Please delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.196.68 ( talk) 17:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The manual link is dead. An updated list of manuals in various languages can be found here: http://cinelerra.org/docs.php
Sorry, I don't want to edit (break) the main page to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.7.187 ( talk) 20:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Can someone elaborate WHY the rewrite? Y23 ( talk) 16:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The article has been tagged for notability and sourcing issues again. Of the references provided, only that from digitalcontentproducer.com appears to be a reliable source. The rest are from the official websites of either Cinelerra or Lumiera, or slashdot, all of which are considered primary sources or otherwise dont meet guidelines reliable sources and insufficient to establish notability. If references demonstrating significant coverage in 3rd party sources cant be located and used to update the article soon , it will be nominated for deletion. Also I notice some involved directly in development of this software are participating, please take a moment to read WP:COI as is advised above.-- RadioFan ( talk) 20:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
There is no mention at all of the distributed rendering capabilities. KenSharp ( talk) 05:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
See Talk:OpenShot Video Editor#Linux-only User:ScotXW t@lk 16:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cinelerra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)