![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ TMXX0818 This article looks great and almost ready to go. As suggested by @ Piotrus, I am leaving some brief comments.
{{ROC}}
, {{USA}}
, {{JPN}}
, etc. for section titles.==See also ==
* wikilink1
* wikilink2
* wikilink3
Good job translating the Chinese article into English, but also please have in mind that the Chinese Wikipedia article may not be the best article–it sometimes comes with its own shortcomings when it comes to citation and formatting. It is the responsibility of a good translator to fix these on their way to go. TheLonelyPather ( talk) 15:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is not documenting the phenomenon on the correct level: it's meant to be about the conception of China by other polities, not just the ways China might be threatening in general. I would start with cutting out almost all of the "Threat type" subsection, as it contains general ruminations and not much cited material about the "theory" per se.
The article should not be about every individual way that a country says China is a threat, that is a poor, synthetic premise.
Remsense
留
17:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ TMXX0818 This article looks great and almost ready to go. As suggested by @ Piotrus, I am leaving some brief comments.
{{ROC}}
, {{USA}}
, {{JPN}}
, etc. for section titles.==See also ==
* wikilink1
* wikilink2
* wikilink3
Good job translating the Chinese article into English, but also please have in mind that the Chinese Wikipedia article may not be the best article–it sometimes comes with its own shortcomings when it comes to citation and formatting. It is the responsibility of a good translator to fix these on their way to go. TheLonelyPather ( talk) 15:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is not documenting the phenomenon on the correct level: it's meant to be about the conception of China by other polities, not just the ways China might be threatening in general. I would start with cutting out almost all of the "Threat type" subsection, as it contains general ruminations and not much cited material about the "theory" per se.
The article should not be about every individual way that a country says China is a threat, that is a poor, synthetic premise.
Remsense
留
17:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)