![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I have removed an odd-looking flag on this article whose justification was unclear, I don't see any unusual technical terms in the article. PatGallacher ( talk) 21:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
I just removed a fair bit of POV, but there's still more I didn't get. I didn't come here to improve this article, however. I've never seen the entire movie. I did watch a fair amount of it on television with my cousin when I twelve years old. I wondered then why the title character was obviously so unhappy and bored. My cousin said that this was because he didn't really write his books himself; he was a plagiarist. Was my cousin right? I came here to find out. Or maybe Bubbles's books are crass commercial exploitations. If there is an explanation, whatever it is, then this article should tell us. On the other hand, if there is no explanation, then the movie itself would seem to me fairly pointless. TheScotch ( talk) 08:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Ploy summary contains numerous instances of editorializing and evaluation, not a factual retelling of plot points. (Posted in iOS client, to be refined later.) David Spalding ( ☎ ✉ ✍) 16:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the page history, a LOT of these statements remain from versions without any distinct PLOT section. They are carried over from someone's uncited OR in an early version of the article. -- David Spalding ( ☎ ✉ ✍) 17:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I have removed an odd-looking flag on this article whose justification was unclear, I don't see any unusual technical terms in the article. PatGallacher ( talk) 21:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
I just removed a fair bit of POV, but there's still more I didn't get. I didn't come here to improve this article, however. I've never seen the entire movie. I did watch a fair amount of it on television with my cousin when I twelve years old. I wondered then why the title character was obviously so unhappy and bored. My cousin said that this was because he didn't really write his books himself; he was a plagiarist. Was my cousin right? I came here to find out. Or maybe Bubbles's books are crass commercial exploitations. If there is an explanation, whatever it is, then this article should tell us. On the other hand, if there is no explanation, then the movie itself would seem to me fairly pointless. TheScotch ( talk) 08:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Ploy summary contains numerous instances of editorializing and evaluation, not a factual retelling of plot points. (Posted in iOS client, to be refined later.) David Spalding ( ☎ ✉ ✍) 16:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the page history, a LOT of these statements remain from versions without any distinct PLOT section. They are carried over from someone's uncited OR in an early version of the article. -- David Spalding ( ☎ ✉ ✍) 17:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)