This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chalciporus piperatus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Chalciporus piperatus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 24, 2016. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 17, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
peppery bolete has been used as a peppery condiment in some countries? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Edible but very peppery, Antonio Carluccio recommends ..."
I found that amusing enough that I have not corrected it. Maproom ( talk) 17:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 19:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Very strong, love the pictures.
Here are a few thoughts being picky:
And, if I was really being picky-
Sources look fine. The variety/separate species thing is the only real issue; other than that, it's a great little article. J Milburn ( talk) 19:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
When I read this article, I notice coding in the taxonomy box that is visible on the page (CTRL + F colspan=2 style="text-align: center; background-color: transparent; text-align:center; border: 1px solid red;" |). I cannot detect this fragment in the page's content, nor have I found it in Template:Taxobox, which the coding fragment was in in the article. I am unsure how to fix this, so I am merely pointing this out. -- Thenewguy34 ( talk) 20:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chalciporus piperatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chalciporus piperatus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Chalciporus piperatus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 24, 2016. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 17, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
peppery bolete has been used as a peppery condiment in some countries? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Edible but very peppery, Antonio Carluccio recommends ..."
I found that amusing enough that I have not corrected it. Maproom ( talk) 17:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 19:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Very strong, love the pictures.
Here are a few thoughts being picky:
And, if I was really being picky-
Sources look fine. The variety/separate species thing is the only real issue; other than that, it's a great little article. J Milburn ( talk) 19:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
When I read this article, I notice coding in the taxonomy box that is visible on the page (CTRL + F colspan=2 style="text-align: center; background-color: transparent; text-align:center; border: 1px solid red;" |). I cannot detect this fragment in the page's content, nor have I found it in Template:Taxobox, which the coding fragment was in in the article. I am unsure how to fix this, so I am merely pointing this out. -- Thenewguy34 ( talk) 20:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chalciporus piperatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)