Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 30, 2012. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary (Moscow) → Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary – This is the only cathedral article with that name at the moment. ♫GoP♫ T C N 13:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Here are the comments in the text; I will answer to all ( version with all notes:
Thanks for these useful comments. I will try to resolve the rest. Regards.--
♫GoP♫
T
C
N 21:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
And now the very last hidden comments:
Ok, I think these were all hidden comments. ♫GoP♫ T C N 22:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I made these edits to the next two sections and the image captions. A truss appeared from nowhere in the text Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Just looking ahead a bit, the disposition of the organ will been seen as over detailed, and its referencing is unorthodox. If you think the information is essential, move it to a subsidiary article. Galleries are discouraged, if the images are essential, find an alternative description, otherwise Commons is the place for image galleries. If you have not used the bibliography texts as references, "Further reading" is preferred Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
ce last part of this section Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
I made these changes]. Please check carefully since I may not have visualised the layout correctly. Are the holy water buckets really buckets or holy water fonts?
On my church FA, I was asked to add something on the congregation and services. Check also for overlinking, items should be linked at the first occurrence only, or once in the lead, and again at the first occurrence in the text.
I'll go through again in a couple of days, and have a look at the images and refs too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I've gone through again Check the second paragraph of "Architecture". What was there before didn't make sense, with the eleventh of ten steps, but I might have misunderstood. I'd suggest that you ask for a peer review or test the water at GAN next Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Following a quick coptedit, I note this phrase "The construction of the cathedral was proposed by the Czarist government in 1894" is that certain that it was proposed by the Czarist government, or should it be during the time of the Czarist government? Secondly, Gothic architecture (revival or genuine) is not my principle forte or interest, but I don't see any influences of Westminster Abbey there other than the most general. Duomo di Milano is undoubtedly an inspiration for it, but I do question Westminster and would suggest checking the source again for relaibility. Giacomo Returned 13:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I did some things in this section...please feel free to change any or everything! Gandydancer ( talk) 18:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
After editing the organ & bells section, I've now got this stuck in my head: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PyBWLALFLQ -- Rock and/or roll! Ryanwould ( talk) 22:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I question the translation of the newspaper account. Some of the words, such as solidity and palpable, sound odd. Here is how it now reads:
Here is a google translation for comparison:
Any thoughts on this? Gandydancer ( talk) 14:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict) This translation was suggested by the Refdesk.
I think that I understand what the person that wrote the newspaper article meant. By saying that it had "wonderful artistic solidity" with not the "slightest stylistic taint visible and palpable", I think that he meant it had "artistic integrity". Dictionary meanings:
Gandydancer ( talk) 15:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
How's this?
Thank you! This translation makes my spirit soar, as I believe was the reporter's intent. Orange, what do you think? Gandydancer ( talk) 20:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:OFFICIALNAME, and WP:PRECISION, but without prejudice for a future revert (or move to better disambiguator per PatGallacher) if other "Cathedrals of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary" are later covered by Wikipedia articles. The fact that Wikipedia does not yet have article does mean that it is not yet ambiguous on Wikipedia. A hatnote pointing to Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception can be added if there's a possibility of confusing this title with the entries there. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 15:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary, Moscow →
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary –
User:Johnbod moved it without discussion to
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary, Moscow. There is only one
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary article in Wikipedia; all other has similar, but still different names, located
on that disambiguation.
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary is clearly a
commoname and should be moved back. Also, as there is a hatnote on this article, it is even more redundant.relisted--
Mike Cline (
talk) 22:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
♫GoP♫
T
C
N 17:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Howdy. This sentence—"Both side aisles are separated from the main aisle by pillar files, consisting of four columns and two half columns."—doesn't make sense; but it wasn't cited and I couldn't figure it out. Would anyone care to clarify? Is is 4 columns on one side and 2.5 on another? How is there a half a column? Please advise. Ryanwould ( talk) 19:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article include the address of the Cathedral? From Russian WP page: "Malaya Gruzinskaya Ul 27/13, near Krasnopresnenskaya, Ulitsa 1905 Goda, Belorusskaya (Koltsevaya Line) subway stations". Mhym ( talk) 02:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Could the background of the photo/info box be changed to blue ("Virgin Mary blue")? It would be a nice touch. Gandydancer ( talk) 21:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I have changed both the section heading and the text to eliminate the word "renovation" in favour of "restoration".
When someone adds a a garret to the roof of their house and a turns the fourth bedroom into a jacuzzi, it's a renovation. When someone puts the spires back onto a church, as per the original form, its a restoration. Architects who meticulously conserve and restore historic buildings hate their work being referred to as "renovation. Amandajm ( talk) 02:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 30, 2012. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary (Moscow) → Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary – This is the only cathedral article with that name at the moment. ♫GoP♫ T C N 13:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Here are the comments in the text; I will answer to all ( version with all notes:
Thanks for these useful comments. I will try to resolve the rest. Regards.--
♫GoP♫
T
C
N 21:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
And now the very last hidden comments:
Ok, I think these were all hidden comments. ♫GoP♫ T C N 22:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I made these edits to the next two sections and the image captions. A truss appeared from nowhere in the text Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Just looking ahead a bit, the disposition of the organ will been seen as over detailed, and its referencing is unorthodox. If you think the information is essential, move it to a subsidiary article. Galleries are discouraged, if the images are essential, find an alternative description, otherwise Commons is the place for image galleries. If you have not used the bibliography texts as references, "Further reading" is preferred Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
ce last part of this section Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
I made these changes]. Please check carefully since I may not have visualised the layout correctly. Are the holy water buckets really buckets or holy water fonts?
On my church FA, I was asked to add something on the congregation and services. Check also for overlinking, items should be linked at the first occurrence only, or once in the lead, and again at the first occurrence in the text.
I'll go through again in a couple of days, and have a look at the images and refs too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I've gone through again Check the second paragraph of "Architecture". What was there before didn't make sense, with the eleventh of ten steps, but I might have misunderstood. I'd suggest that you ask for a peer review or test the water at GAN next Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Following a quick coptedit, I note this phrase "The construction of the cathedral was proposed by the Czarist government in 1894" is that certain that it was proposed by the Czarist government, or should it be during the time of the Czarist government? Secondly, Gothic architecture (revival or genuine) is not my principle forte or interest, but I don't see any influences of Westminster Abbey there other than the most general. Duomo di Milano is undoubtedly an inspiration for it, but I do question Westminster and would suggest checking the source again for relaibility. Giacomo Returned 13:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I did some things in this section...please feel free to change any or everything! Gandydancer ( talk) 18:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
After editing the organ & bells section, I've now got this stuck in my head: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PyBWLALFLQ -- Rock and/or roll! Ryanwould ( talk) 22:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I question the translation of the newspaper account. Some of the words, such as solidity and palpable, sound odd. Here is how it now reads:
Here is a google translation for comparison:
Any thoughts on this? Gandydancer ( talk) 14:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict) This translation was suggested by the Refdesk.
I think that I understand what the person that wrote the newspaper article meant. By saying that it had "wonderful artistic solidity" with not the "slightest stylistic taint visible and palpable", I think that he meant it had "artistic integrity". Dictionary meanings:
Gandydancer ( talk) 15:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
How's this?
Thank you! This translation makes my spirit soar, as I believe was the reporter's intent. Orange, what do you think? Gandydancer ( talk) 20:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:OFFICIALNAME, and WP:PRECISION, but without prejudice for a future revert (or move to better disambiguator per PatGallacher) if other "Cathedrals of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary" are later covered by Wikipedia articles. The fact that Wikipedia does not yet have article does mean that it is not yet ambiguous on Wikipedia. A hatnote pointing to Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception can be added if there's a possibility of confusing this title with the entries there. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 15:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary, Moscow →
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary –
User:Johnbod moved it without discussion to
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary, Moscow. There is only one
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary article in Wikipedia; all other has similar, but still different names, located
on that disambiguation.
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary is clearly a
commoname and should be moved back. Also, as there is a hatnote on this article, it is even more redundant.relisted--
Mike Cline (
talk) 22:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
♫GoP♫
T
C
N 17:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Howdy. This sentence—"Both side aisles are separated from the main aisle by pillar files, consisting of four columns and two half columns."—doesn't make sense; but it wasn't cited and I couldn't figure it out. Would anyone care to clarify? Is is 4 columns on one side and 2.5 on another? How is there a half a column? Please advise. Ryanwould ( talk) 19:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article include the address of the Cathedral? From Russian WP page: "Malaya Gruzinskaya Ul 27/13, near Krasnopresnenskaya, Ulitsa 1905 Goda, Belorusskaya (Koltsevaya Line) subway stations". Mhym ( talk) 02:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Could the background of the photo/info box be changed to blue ("Virgin Mary blue")? It would be a nice touch. Gandydancer ( talk) 21:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I have changed both the section heading and the text to eliminate the word "renovation" in favour of "restoration".
When someone adds a a garret to the roof of their house and a turns the fourth bedroom into a jacuzzi, it's a renovation. When someone puts the spires back onto a church, as per the original form, its a restoration. Architects who meticulously conserve and restore historic buildings hate their work being referred to as "renovation. Amandajm ( talk) 02:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Moscow). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)