This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Paranormal Low‑importance This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. It is requested that a photograph be added to this article to improve its quality. Parapsychology ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikipedia link to Children's_Past Lives should be without an underscore... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon Ascton ( talk • contribs) 22:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply

I propose merging Children's Past Lives in this article, Carol Bowman. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate – 07:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Merge. Looking at available sources, book is more notable than the individual. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 20:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  Do you think merging Carol Bowman in the book's article would be a better idea? I can't say I really evaluated the author's notability, but the AFD results for the book article were not that convincing. — Paleo Neonate – 06:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Agree there is so little independent sourcing about the author and the book, that only one article is needed. A quick search shows Publishers Weekly, Robert Todd Carroll, and this, and perhaps one other I missed. FWIW, I noticed they all focused on the book, rather than the author. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 14:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I tend to agree with the dog. A BLP article with a section on the book is more useful/readable than a book article with a BLP section shoehorned into it. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 18:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Merge for better coverage of a single topic. GPinkerton ( talk) 02:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
• Support merge, either way, but nicer to have a BLP I think. - Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 18:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Support. What Dog said. Springnuts ( talk) 07:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I have redirected the book to this page. - Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 12:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply