From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Bone Sweet Bone" fits in this policy according to Wikipedia

The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:

Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.[2] The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

) Yay Dad ( talk) 03:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Then please provide references to validate those assertions. As of right now, this is an unreferenced article. YouTube is not a valid reference. Onel5969 TT me 20:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Has already been add. Best :) Yay Dad ( talk) 01:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Uh... no. Reliable sourcing is required. Blogs and YouTube are not reliable sourcing. Onel5969 TT me 01:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Then what is consider reliable source? :) Yay Dad ( talk) 02:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
See WP:RS. Onel5969 TT me 02:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Bone Sweet Bone" fits in this policy according to Wikipedia

The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:

Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.[2] The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

) Yay Dad ( talk) 03:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Then please provide references to validate those assertions. As of right now, this is an unreferenced article. YouTube is not a valid reference. Onel5969 TT me 20:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Has already been add. Best :) Yay Dad ( talk) 01:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Uh... no. Reliable sourcing is required. Blogs and YouTube are not reliable sourcing. Onel5969 TT me 01:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Then what is consider reliable source? :) Yay Dad ( talk) 02:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply
See WP:RS. Onel5969 TT me 02:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook