This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bohemian Rhapsody (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Excuse me,But i got word from various entertainment news reports that the production for Bohemian Rhapsody has been halted due to Bryan Singer’s health issues such as variety for example [1]
What should we do with this Movie's wikipedia article now that the movie production is halted. -- Belrien12 ( talk) 06:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
References
I edited the article to reflect this. Thoughts on my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HalifaxMilkDud ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Bryan Singer was the original director credited, and under the studios' contract with the DGA there can be only one. [1] The DGA, at its sole discretion, would have to approve replacing Singer's name with Dexter Fletcher's, but there are no reports that they have done so yet. I'm taking Fletcher out of the Infobox, with the note that he stepped in at the end of principal photography and may be given credit at the DGA's discretion. If the Guild decides not to give Fletcher a directing credit, then we could always add him back with the parenthetical (Uncredited). But for right now, it's premature to say that Fletcher won't be credited, and there's still only one official director and it's still Singer. SixFourThree ( talk) 16:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)SixFourThree
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
It has even been acknowledged that he referred to Mary as the love of his life. [2] Even Vanity Fair acknowledged that she got most of his estate when he died. [3] 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 22:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Sometimes, what some would like to believe isn't what history documents. Many critics who cricitized the film's portrayal of Mercury's sexuality clearly had a hard time accepting this. I think this article should sort out these biases as well. Even an article discussing Mary's thoughts on the film would be helpful 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
And what do you think I sourced? That no research policy only refers to unreliable resources and sources not containing content related to the edit. I also like to include many secondary sources. 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm afraid you're running out of excuses. Synth merely repeats the no original research policy and encourages no contradiction 2601:447:4101:41F9:B80F:B090:36C5:4F23 ( talk) 00:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I merely wish to find an article about critical bias towards the film's portrayal of his sexuality. I think both the film's performance at the box office so far and audience reviews shows that this article must be representational and see eye to eye with the opinions of the general population and not the opinions of the critics. Reading the difference in the score on Rotten Tomatoes was really intriguing to me as well. The top critics gave it 44% while the audience gave it 95%. [4] 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Truth hurts. Rotten Tomatoes had a similar stance as CinemaScore as well. It even went beyond a second reliable source with PostTrack 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 13:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Right now, we're using this source as a citation for the film's critical consensus. Several editors have added things that don't seem to be in it. The source says: "Across the board, critics have praised Malek’s performance as one of the year’s best, while panning some of the film’s otherwise lackluster qualities, like its sanitization of Mercury’s sexuality and failure to live up to iconic band’s electrifying essence." I think we should stick as closely as possible to this, avoiding synthesis or other forms of original research. This includes unsourced claims about a consensus on "historical inaccuracies" and criticism about the direction, as seen in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 09:24, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
@ NinjaRobotPirate: Wasn't intended to blank it, was more that the way it was worded implied that was the only issue with the direction/script was the sexuality and not more, as is the case (and it doesn’t need to be cited up top, per MOS:LEAD). I restored the sexuality line, didn’t mean to kick up dust on this all (because based on this Talk Page and the edit summaries people are making a big deal of the summarization of one film’s critical reception haha)... TropicAces ( talk) 14:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)tropicAces
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." This is a blockable offense. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
There seems to be a lot of conflict and discussion over the "Critical Reception" sentence in the Intro section. I've decided to get rid of it until we're on the same page. I'm open to the possibility of putting it back, or doing without the sentence. I'm open to discussion. -- Draco9904 ( talk) 1:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Do we really need to update the box office stats on an hourly basis, seems silly to me. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
I removed "and has been cited as an example of gay erasure" from a recent addition since it doesn't seem to be actually widely cited as such? There are a number of critical opinion pieces out there about how his homosexual relationships were presented in the movie, though, so I left the rest of the sentence the same. Diff can be see here [5]. on camera (t) 09:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The 'further inaccuracies' section has been removed, which is kind of odd to me as it raises two problems: 1. Either the wording of the opening sentence (concerning the Rolling Stone article) should be changed to accommodate listed inaccuracies outside of the article Or 2. The inaccuracies found and cited should be separately listed in a non-article related section if the inaccuracy hasn't been noted in the article
Thoughts? Letmejustcorrectthatforyou ( talk) 01:19, 08 January 2019 (UTC)
I've removed original research from the "Historical accuracy" section -- content whose sources predate the film, which is unacceptable per WP:FILMHIST. Editors are not permitted to play armchair historians, synthesizing sources unrelated to the film to draw novel conclusions about a film's historical accuracies or inaccuracies. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems to me that juxtaposing facts vs. the film is not drawing conclusions and does not violate the OR rule. Short of reverting, I agree with Letmejustcorrectthatforyou that at least a separate section is warranted. Plummer ( talk) 06:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
I understand that Wikipedia is not bound by DGA rules, but the infobox almost always uses information released by the studio (poster billing block, film credits order, stuff like that). Regardless, I'm not completely opposed to doing this, but I think this is a pretty big thing to change and should be discussed on the talk page first. Sandrobost ( talk) 10:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
So, bringing this back to the left, let's talk some more. And maybe we can clarify our thoughts to avoid any further misunderstandings. How would you like the directors listed?
I think it is inaccurate to give Fletcher a directing credit for two reasons:
The above statement "places like Amazon, IMDb are listing them both as directors" fails verification at:
IMDb does mention Fletcher (& Sigel) in its trivia section.— Cristallo ( talk) 07:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Do we really need to list awards that we don't even have an article for? Like North Texas Film Critics Association? Major awards should go there, not every website and film circle that ever existed. Also, where do the sources constantly disappear? I remember having sourced this section a few days ago and now again half of it doesn't have the source. Removing sources is considered vandalism. Teemeah 편지 (letter) 19:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Malek won for Best Actor and the film was nominated for Best Comedy/Musical at the Los Angeles Online Film Critics Society Awards. It was added to the article under the name Online Film Critics Society weeks ago, and therefore I removed it because are not the same. Btw, actors attended the ceremony so I guess is relevant-but it doesn't have an article here yet. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 01:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
The topic says, "sing-alone".
I think they meant "singalong" but I can't correct it.
Unless, I suppose, if someone was rich enough to hire a whole movie house to themself?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Ta,
but "singalong" according to the Oxford English. It's a British movie/story.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/singalong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I thought the Mike Myers' Wayne’s World reference was worth a mention. Made me laugh. Imagine it flew right over the heads of most viewers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There has been a lot of debate about whether or not to include Fletcher in the infobox, but there does not seem to be a clear consensus one way or the other. So should we include Fletcher in the infobox with Singer, or should we just include Singer with a note mentioning that Fletcher took over towards the end of production? RfC extended 21:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC); originally raised by JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 03:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Axem Titanium and @ User:Oncamera you are both misrepresenting the original discussion when you say it resulted in a consensus to include both directors. There was no consensus one way or another at all in the original discussion, which is why I started this RFC in the first place. After the discussion had been open for a month and weeks had passed since anyone had commented on it, I made a request for it to be closed, but then I was told that since it was unanimous, I could just make the change myself. So I did. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
The claim that sources call Fletcher the director of the film is extremely misleading. Yes there are plenty of sources saying that took over towards the end of filming and directed some scenes. Nobody is disputing that. However, none of the sources refer to him as the director of the film. Rather, 'Bohemian Rhapsody' director is used almost exclusively to refer to Bryan Singer. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Since Axem Titanium was so concerned about editors who previously discussed this topic not paticipating in this conversation, I'm pinging @ SixFourThree: @ Rusted AutoParts: @ RR: @ Sandrobost: @ Iamnoahflores: @ Whovian99: @ Cristallo:. Seems a little weird to me Axem was so offended that I didn't ping the participants in the previous discussion, but then didn't bother to do so themselves either, but whatever. I believe that's everyone who participated in the previous discussions that hasn't already commented here, but if I missed anyone, please ping them for me. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 14:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
"Malek confirmed that he had conducted recordings at Abbey Road Studios" What does this mean, exactly? Surely all of the singing voice in the film is that of the real Freddie Mercury, correct? If some lyrics are Malek's voice overdubbing Mercury, which are they? Is Malek doing any actual singing in the film? In which scenes or parts? Addressing the singing is a critical subject to be included in the "Production" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starhistory22 ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the hyperlink to Mary Austin. It is linked to the wrong Mary Austin Billwalker23 ( talk) 08:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm uncertain how to add this information. Bohemian Rhapsody was nominated for Best Foriegn Film in Japan. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/japan-academy-awards-shoplifters-leads-13-nominations-1176525
I was unsure how to add the info without messing up the table.
Brian May and Roger Taylor also recorded a thank you to Japan for the award that the soundtrack received.
I would like to move the list of accolades to a new page, as I've done with other movie pages. Should I move it to List of accolades received by Bohemian Rhapsody (which I've already created a re-direct for), or List of accolades received by Bohemian Rhapsody (film)? Daerl ( talk) 13:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I made an edit to add a disambiguation clause at the top since there's a popular song with the same name, and it was undone by Evil Idiot ( talk) with reason "Unnecessary". Can someone please explain why? 12:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kstern ( talk • contribs)
It's not necessary because this isn't the primary topic and the article title already contains disambiguation. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The film shows the band playing " Fat Bottomed Girls" live on tour before they have even gone into the studio to record A Night at the Opera - isn't there a Crazy Little Thing Called Chronology? JezGrove ( talk) 23:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The second sentence under this section currently reads "Sources said that Singer had not returned to the set after the Thanksgiving week". "After the Thanksgiving week" needs to go, as it is not an actual date understood by everyone, worldwide. There is even a "when?" in brackets at the end of the sentence. To the best of my knowledge, Thanksgiving is only celebrated in two countries, Canada and the US, with Canada's being in October, and the US's being in November. No other countries celebrate Thanksgiving, so "Thanksgiving week" should be replaced with an actual date, as "Thanksgiving week" is not universally understood to be a date. It doesn't clarify which Thanksgiving is being referred to, and most people on the planet have no idea what date either of the Thanksgivings fall on. Please change this to an actual date, or set of dates, in a universally understood format. Kubrickrules ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with labeling this film as a musical. Musicals are when characters break into song throughout the film. That is not the case here. All of the songs sung are songs that the band are currently playing. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bohemian Rhapsody (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Excuse me,But i got word from various entertainment news reports that the production for Bohemian Rhapsody has been halted due to Bryan Singer’s health issues such as variety for example [1]
What should we do with this Movie's wikipedia article now that the movie production is halted. -- Belrien12 ( talk) 06:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
References
I edited the article to reflect this. Thoughts on my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HalifaxMilkDud ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Bryan Singer was the original director credited, and under the studios' contract with the DGA there can be only one. [1] The DGA, at its sole discretion, would have to approve replacing Singer's name with Dexter Fletcher's, but there are no reports that they have done so yet. I'm taking Fletcher out of the Infobox, with the note that he stepped in at the end of principal photography and may be given credit at the DGA's discretion. If the Guild decides not to give Fletcher a directing credit, then we could always add him back with the parenthetical (Uncredited). But for right now, it's premature to say that Fletcher won't be credited, and there's still only one official director and it's still Singer. SixFourThree ( talk) 16:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)SixFourThree
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
It has even been acknowledged that he referred to Mary as the love of his life. [2] Even Vanity Fair acknowledged that she got most of his estate when he died. [3] 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 22:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Sometimes, what some would like to believe isn't what history documents. Many critics who cricitized the film's portrayal of Mercury's sexuality clearly had a hard time accepting this. I think this article should sort out these biases as well. Even an article discussing Mary's thoughts on the film would be helpful 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
And what do you think I sourced? That no research policy only refers to unreliable resources and sources not containing content related to the edit. I also like to include many secondary sources. 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm afraid you're running out of excuses. Synth merely repeats the no original research policy and encourages no contradiction 2601:447:4101:41F9:B80F:B090:36C5:4F23 ( talk) 00:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I merely wish to find an article about critical bias towards the film's portrayal of his sexuality. I think both the film's performance at the box office so far and audience reviews shows that this article must be representational and see eye to eye with the opinions of the general population and not the opinions of the critics. Reading the difference in the score on Rotten Tomatoes was really intriguing to me as well. The top critics gave it 44% while the audience gave it 95%. [4] 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 00:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Truth hurts. Rotten Tomatoes had a similar stance as CinemaScore as well. It even went beyond a second reliable source with PostTrack 2601:447:4101:41F9:E56A:A32F:5891:12D2 ( talk) 13:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Right now, we're using this source as a citation for the film's critical consensus. Several editors have added things that don't seem to be in it. The source says: "Across the board, critics have praised Malek’s performance as one of the year’s best, while panning some of the film’s otherwise lackluster qualities, like its sanitization of Mercury’s sexuality and failure to live up to iconic band’s electrifying essence." I think we should stick as closely as possible to this, avoiding synthesis or other forms of original research. This includes unsourced claims about a consensus on "historical inaccuracies" and criticism about the direction, as seen in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 09:24, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
@ NinjaRobotPirate: Wasn't intended to blank it, was more that the way it was worded implied that was the only issue with the direction/script was the sexuality and not more, as is the case (and it doesn’t need to be cited up top, per MOS:LEAD). I restored the sexuality line, didn’t mean to kick up dust on this all (because based on this Talk Page and the edit summaries people are making a big deal of the summarization of one film’s critical reception haha)... TropicAces ( talk) 14:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)tropicAces
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." This is a blockable offense. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
There seems to be a lot of conflict and discussion over the "Critical Reception" sentence in the Intro section. I've decided to get rid of it until we're on the same page. I'm open to the possibility of putting it back, or doing without the sentence. I'm open to discussion. -- Draco9904 ( talk) 1:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Do we really need to update the box office stats on an hourly basis, seems silly to me. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
I removed "and has been cited as an example of gay erasure" from a recent addition since it doesn't seem to be actually widely cited as such? There are a number of critical opinion pieces out there about how his homosexual relationships were presented in the movie, though, so I left the rest of the sentence the same. Diff can be see here [5]. on camera (t) 09:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The 'further inaccuracies' section has been removed, which is kind of odd to me as it raises two problems: 1. Either the wording of the opening sentence (concerning the Rolling Stone article) should be changed to accommodate listed inaccuracies outside of the article Or 2. The inaccuracies found and cited should be separately listed in a non-article related section if the inaccuracy hasn't been noted in the article
Thoughts? Letmejustcorrectthatforyou ( talk) 01:19, 08 January 2019 (UTC)
I've removed original research from the "Historical accuracy" section -- content whose sources predate the film, which is unacceptable per WP:FILMHIST. Editors are not permitted to play armchair historians, synthesizing sources unrelated to the film to draw novel conclusions about a film's historical accuracies or inaccuracies. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems to me that juxtaposing facts vs. the film is not drawing conclusions and does not violate the OR rule. Short of reverting, I agree with Letmejustcorrectthatforyou that at least a separate section is warranted. Plummer ( talk) 06:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
I understand that Wikipedia is not bound by DGA rules, but the infobox almost always uses information released by the studio (poster billing block, film credits order, stuff like that). Regardless, I'm not completely opposed to doing this, but I think this is a pretty big thing to change and should be discussed on the talk page first. Sandrobost ( talk) 10:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
So, bringing this back to the left, let's talk some more. And maybe we can clarify our thoughts to avoid any further misunderstandings. How would you like the directors listed?
I think it is inaccurate to give Fletcher a directing credit for two reasons:
The above statement "places like Amazon, IMDb are listing them both as directors" fails verification at:
IMDb does mention Fletcher (& Sigel) in its trivia section.— Cristallo ( talk) 07:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Do we really need to list awards that we don't even have an article for? Like North Texas Film Critics Association? Major awards should go there, not every website and film circle that ever existed. Also, where do the sources constantly disappear? I remember having sourced this section a few days ago and now again half of it doesn't have the source. Removing sources is considered vandalism. Teemeah 편지 (letter) 19:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Malek won for Best Actor and the film was nominated for Best Comedy/Musical at the Los Angeles Online Film Critics Society Awards. It was added to the article under the name Online Film Critics Society weeks ago, and therefore I removed it because are not the same. Btw, actors attended the ceremony so I guess is relevant-but it doesn't have an article here yet. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 01:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
The topic says, "sing-alone".
I think they meant "singalong" but I can't correct it.
Unless, I suppose, if someone was rich enough to hire a whole movie house to themself?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Ta,
but "singalong" according to the Oxford English. It's a British movie/story.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/singalong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I thought the Mike Myers' Wayne’s World reference was worth a mention. Made me laugh. Imagine it flew right over the heads of most viewers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.108 ( talk) 23:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There has been a lot of debate about whether or not to include Fletcher in the infobox, but there does not seem to be a clear consensus one way or the other. So should we include Fletcher in the infobox with Singer, or should we just include Singer with a note mentioning that Fletcher took over towards the end of production? RfC extended 21:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC); originally raised by JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 03:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Axem Titanium and @ User:Oncamera you are both misrepresenting the original discussion when you say it resulted in a consensus to include both directors. There was no consensus one way or another at all in the original discussion, which is why I started this RFC in the first place. After the discussion had been open for a month and weeks had passed since anyone had commented on it, I made a request for it to be closed, but then I was told that since it was unanimous, I could just make the change myself. So I did. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
The claim that sources call Fletcher the director of the film is extremely misleading. Yes there are plenty of sources saying that took over towards the end of filming and directed some scenes. Nobody is disputing that. However, none of the sources refer to him as the director of the film. Rather, 'Bohemian Rhapsody' director is used almost exclusively to refer to Bryan Singer. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Since Axem Titanium was so concerned about editors who previously discussed this topic not paticipating in this conversation, I'm pinging @ SixFourThree: @ Rusted AutoParts: @ RR: @ Sandrobost: @ Iamnoahflores: @ Whovian99: @ Cristallo:. Seems a little weird to me Axem was so offended that I didn't ping the participants in the previous discussion, but then didn't bother to do so themselves either, but whatever. I believe that's everyone who participated in the previous discussions that hasn't already commented here, but if I missed anyone, please ping them for me. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 14:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
"Malek confirmed that he had conducted recordings at Abbey Road Studios" What does this mean, exactly? Surely all of the singing voice in the film is that of the real Freddie Mercury, correct? If some lyrics are Malek's voice overdubbing Mercury, which are they? Is Malek doing any actual singing in the film? In which scenes or parts? Addressing the singing is a critical subject to be included in the "Production" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starhistory22 ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the hyperlink to Mary Austin. It is linked to the wrong Mary Austin Billwalker23 ( talk) 08:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm uncertain how to add this information. Bohemian Rhapsody was nominated for Best Foriegn Film in Japan. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/japan-academy-awards-shoplifters-leads-13-nominations-1176525
I was unsure how to add the info without messing up the table.
Brian May and Roger Taylor also recorded a thank you to Japan for the award that the soundtrack received.
I would like to move the list of accolades to a new page, as I've done with other movie pages. Should I move it to List of accolades received by Bohemian Rhapsody (which I've already created a re-direct for), or List of accolades received by Bohemian Rhapsody (film)? Daerl ( talk) 13:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I made an edit to add a disambiguation clause at the top since there's a popular song with the same name, and it was undone by Evil Idiot ( talk) with reason "Unnecessary". Can someone please explain why? 12:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kstern ( talk • contribs)
It's not necessary because this isn't the primary topic and the article title already contains disambiguation. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 17:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The film shows the band playing " Fat Bottomed Girls" live on tour before they have even gone into the studio to record A Night at the Opera - isn't there a Crazy Little Thing Called Chronology? JezGrove ( talk) 23:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The second sentence under this section currently reads "Sources said that Singer had not returned to the set after the Thanksgiving week". "After the Thanksgiving week" needs to go, as it is not an actual date understood by everyone, worldwide. There is even a "when?" in brackets at the end of the sentence. To the best of my knowledge, Thanksgiving is only celebrated in two countries, Canada and the US, with Canada's being in October, and the US's being in November. No other countries celebrate Thanksgiving, so "Thanksgiving week" should be replaced with an actual date, as "Thanksgiving week" is not universally understood to be a date. It doesn't clarify which Thanksgiving is being referred to, and most people on the planet have no idea what date either of the Thanksgivings fall on. Please change this to an actual date, or set of dates, in a universally understood format. Kubrickrules ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with labeling this film as a musical. Musicals are when characters break into song throughout the film. That is not the case here. All of the songs sung are songs that the band are currently playing. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)