Article milestones Date Process Result August 10, 2022 Proposed deletion Sent to articles for deletion September 2, 2022 Articles for deletion No consensus December 6, 2022 Deletion review Endorsed July 30, 2024 Articles for deletion Kept

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disambiguation This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles Articles for creation This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This redirect was accepted on 8 July 2022 by reviewer IAmChaos ( talk · contribs).

As the person who created a redirect page at Bobby Witt (disambiguation) before dabifying it, I would like get a deletion review for the dab's AfD. Since Buidhe - who originally PRODed the page - decided to BLAR this page per my AfD "vote", and because dabification does have some support in the AfD, I propose that we perhaps do a DRV to ensure consensus for her action. Also pinging Star Mississippi, the AfD's closer. Thanks, NotReallySoroka ( talk) 02:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The proposed dabification is not supported by policy or guidelines and should have been discarded by the discussion closer. ( t · c) buidhe 05:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please forgive me if I am misinterpreting you, but whether [t]he proposed dabification [...] should have been discarded by the discussion closer would indeed be a good point to argue at a DRV. NotReallySoroka ( talk) 05:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks @ NotReallySoroka. I'm happy for a DRV as I don't see consensus, and relisting two months later for a 3rd time is probably not going to be possible. What I would suggest when you open the DRV is a more detail as I'm not clear on why the BLAR was incorrect as I'm not fully understanding that, and I think others might be in the same boat. Thanks for heads up on this. Star Mississippi 13:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

I'd also just suggest if/when you proceed, put the pointer to this discussion as folks will look for/not see it on my Talk and ask why you didn't run it by me, so let's avoid that step. Star Mississippi 13:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply