This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Info Box is missing Model Number: STV100-1 JamCad605 ( talk) 19:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
STV100-1 is only one of the variants for the US. There are a total of 6 variants, for instance the UK model is STV100-4. http://store.shopblackberry.com/store/bbrryus/en_GB/pd/productID.328096000/categoryID.70448700 -- 76.10.150.193 ( talk) 23:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
@ ViperSnake151: I specifically said that I can't find a consistent application of this term and it is unreferenced here. Reverting that again without providing a source is not constructive. If you have a source for it, please add it before undoing the change, otherwise it should be removed. BlackBerry uses lots of different ways to refer to this product: BlackBerry Priv, PRIV, Priv, *PRIV and "PRIV™ by BlackBerry®". I don't see a consistent scheme for "PRIV by BlackBerry" here. What we can say is that BlackBerry doesn't prepend the BlackBerry brand consistently and just calls it PRIV or Priv. For that we follow the manual of style and write it as Priv instead of PRIV.–Totie ( talk) 22:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
« Blackberry Venice » is an automatic redirect to this article but ought not be as it's shaping up to be the codename for a different device. 164.68.29.8 ( talk) 05:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
The Reception section is extremely biased. The BlackBerry Priv received great reviews from Forbes, WSJ, Mobile Nation and countless others. On 17 November, CNBC stated that "The Toronto-based firm's first Android-powered device, the Priv, has received mostly favorable reviews following its official launch earlier this month". [1] Nonetheless, this Wiki article is mainly concentrated around the handful of negative reviews. ( Jbfair728 ( talk) 22:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC))
In the preamble there is currently a sentence that says "However, the performance, build quality, and the physical keyboard of the Priv received mixed reviews for their varying quality." This apparently claims not that there are varying opinions among the reviewers with regard to the build quality and performance of the phone, but that there are reports that individual units of the Blackberry Priv coming off the production line have varying levels of build quality and performance. I haven't been able to find anything supporting this on Google, though. Is there anyone who can corroborate this information? I am personally very curious about this. (I added a "citation needed" tag, by the way.) Thracia91 ( talk) 14:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Varying quality refers to the varying reception. Some reviews thought it was good, some thought it was bad. And do you know what a lead is supposed to do? Summarize the body. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
My edits which updated this article were reverted by ViperSnake151. Why? Who knows? He failed to provide an Edit Summary as Wikipedia requires. Since he has not done so, I have reverted his edits. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Clearly, ViperSnake151 wishes to have an edit war WP:EDITWAR He keeps deleting my edits without any logical reason for the old text vs. my updated text. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I reverted his reversion of my edits because there was no logical reason for him to do so and he has yet to provide any rationale whatsoever. He posted a note on my Talk page indicating that I did not own the article. I agree. He does not either. Repeat: WP:Edit summary Edits that do not have an edit summary are more likely to be reverted, because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Note that ViperSnake151 has not responded to any of my comments on this page. I have filed my response to his complaint at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, Item 21 OWNership issues on BlackBerry-related articles /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#OWNership_issues_on_BlackBerry-related_articles. Peter K Burian ( talk) 19:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Info Box is missing Model Number: STV100-1 JamCad605 ( talk) 19:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
STV100-1 is only one of the variants for the US. There are a total of 6 variants, for instance the UK model is STV100-4. http://store.shopblackberry.com/store/bbrryus/en_GB/pd/productID.328096000/categoryID.70448700 -- 76.10.150.193 ( talk) 23:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
@ ViperSnake151: I specifically said that I can't find a consistent application of this term and it is unreferenced here. Reverting that again without providing a source is not constructive. If you have a source for it, please add it before undoing the change, otherwise it should be removed. BlackBerry uses lots of different ways to refer to this product: BlackBerry Priv, PRIV, Priv, *PRIV and "PRIV™ by BlackBerry®". I don't see a consistent scheme for "PRIV by BlackBerry" here. What we can say is that BlackBerry doesn't prepend the BlackBerry brand consistently and just calls it PRIV or Priv. For that we follow the manual of style and write it as Priv instead of PRIV.–Totie ( talk) 22:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
« Blackberry Venice » is an automatic redirect to this article but ought not be as it's shaping up to be the codename for a different device. 164.68.29.8 ( talk) 05:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
The Reception section is extremely biased. The BlackBerry Priv received great reviews from Forbes, WSJ, Mobile Nation and countless others. On 17 November, CNBC stated that "The Toronto-based firm's first Android-powered device, the Priv, has received mostly favorable reviews following its official launch earlier this month". [1] Nonetheless, this Wiki article is mainly concentrated around the handful of negative reviews. ( Jbfair728 ( talk) 22:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC))
In the preamble there is currently a sentence that says "However, the performance, build quality, and the physical keyboard of the Priv received mixed reviews for their varying quality." This apparently claims not that there are varying opinions among the reviewers with regard to the build quality and performance of the phone, but that there are reports that individual units of the Blackberry Priv coming off the production line have varying levels of build quality and performance. I haven't been able to find anything supporting this on Google, though. Is there anyone who can corroborate this information? I am personally very curious about this. (I added a "citation needed" tag, by the way.) Thracia91 ( talk) 14:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Varying quality refers to the varying reception. Some reviews thought it was good, some thought it was bad. And do you know what a lead is supposed to do? Summarize the body. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
My edits which updated this article were reverted by ViperSnake151. Why? Who knows? He failed to provide an Edit Summary as Wikipedia requires. Since he has not done so, I have reverted his edits. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Clearly, ViperSnake151 wishes to have an edit war WP:EDITWAR He keeps deleting my edits without any logical reason for the old text vs. my updated text. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I reverted his reversion of my edits because there was no logical reason for him to do so and he has yet to provide any rationale whatsoever. He posted a note on my Talk page indicating that I did not own the article. I agree. He does not either. Repeat: WP:Edit summary Edits that do not have an edit summary are more likely to be reverted, because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was. Peter K Burian ( talk) 16:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Note that ViperSnake151 has not responded to any of my comments on this page. I have filed my response to his complaint at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, Item 21 OWNership issues on BlackBerry-related articles /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#OWNership_issues_on_BlackBerry-related_articles. Peter K Burian ( talk) 19:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)