This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Changsha (1941–1942) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
this number does not make any sense. if that be true, it's OK to say that all 120,000 IJA's soldiers were killed and wounded. that also means the whole force of IJA in Battle was been completely wiped out and there would be no any treat at all. or we can assume that the soldiers of IJA were supermen or somethings. Flag cloud ( talk) 12:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
|strength1 = 300,000 soldiers |strength2 = 120,000 soldiers<ref name="ChinaBitter158">Hsiung, James Chieh; Levine, Steven I. ''China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan, 1937–1945'', p. 158</ref><br/>600 pieces of artillery<ref name="ChinaBitter158"/><br/>200 aircraft<ref name="ChinaBitter158"/> |casualties1 = 29,217 killed and wounded<ref>翁里陽、博凡、常然著,《中國抗日戰爭-氣壯山河》,台北市:知兵堂,2007年</ref> |casualties2 = Japanese source: 1,591 killed<br>4,412 wounded<ref>[http://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Japan/Monos/pdfs/JM-71/JM-71.PDF Japanese Monograph No. 71, Army Operations in China] pp. 76.</ref> Chinese source: 56,000 killed and wounded
Need a paragraph to record the details. PS: I think it may be necessary to investigate editing war.I feel very confused why the editing time of FormosaKMT and 2600:387:6:805:0:0:0:85/61 is very close at 25 October 2018.
I found another problem that may have been added to an untrustworthy reference. The source of the reference is Chinese. So I put {{overcoverage}}.-- Witotiwo ( talk) 22:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Changsha (1941–1942) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
this number does not make any sense. if that be true, it's OK to say that all 120,000 IJA's soldiers were killed and wounded. that also means the whole force of IJA in Battle was been completely wiped out and there would be no any treat at all. or we can assume that the soldiers of IJA were supermen or somethings. Flag cloud ( talk) 12:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
|strength1 = 300,000 soldiers |strength2 = 120,000 soldiers<ref name="ChinaBitter158">Hsiung, James Chieh; Levine, Steven I. ''China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan, 1937–1945'', p. 158</ref><br/>600 pieces of artillery<ref name="ChinaBitter158"/><br/>200 aircraft<ref name="ChinaBitter158"/> |casualties1 = 29,217 killed and wounded<ref>翁里陽、博凡、常然著,《中國抗日戰爭-氣壯山河》,台北市:知兵堂,2007年</ref> |casualties2 = Japanese source: 1,591 killed<br>4,412 wounded<ref>[http://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Japan/Monos/pdfs/JM-71/JM-71.PDF Japanese Monograph No. 71, Army Operations in China] pp. 76.</ref> Chinese source: 56,000 killed and wounded
Need a paragraph to record the details. PS: I think it may be necessary to investigate editing war.I feel very confused why the editing time of FormosaKMT and 2600:387:6:805:0:0:0:85/61 is very close at 25 October 2018.
I found another problem that may have been added to an untrustworthy reference. The source of the reference is Chinese. So I put {{overcoverage}}.-- Witotiwo ( talk) 22:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)