![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The Muslim Filipinos, called Moros, had been raiding and pillaging the countryside for centuries."
I am puzzled as to why that claim is presented. How is it relevant to the article? It appears to be an attempt to justify the invasions and subsequent brutality.
I feel it should be eliminated.
63.85.117.146 11:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Jeff Zervas
It looks like I'll be doing a paper on this battle for a history class. I'll try to clean up the article a bit. Part of the trouble is that it looks like that previous contributors used this as a source: http://www.bakbakan.com/swishk/swk3-19.html which was written back in 1936, hence the lack of PC wording. It also looks like some of the langauge of the article used material from the source without properly citing it, might be some copyvio issues. On the other hand, some of the information in the article is inconsistent with the information in the source. This article could use some work. I'll go ahead and post a clean up notice... crazyeddie 00:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
...just from looking at the online sources. We should consolidate that article into this one, then streamline the collection. BusterD 23:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
The issue of the Colt 45 was a direct result of the Moro campaign, because of the 38's inability to stop a charging Muslim fanatic.
are you serious?
Each of these will have their own articles, and the first one is workable now. If my action seems premature, please revert. My intention is draw attention to the more accurate, more complete, better considered article. BusterD 01:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The Muslim Filipinos, called Moros, had been raiding and pillaging the countryside for centuries."
I am puzzled as to why that claim is presented. How is it relevant to the article? It appears to be an attempt to justify the invasions and subsequent brutality.
I feel it should be eliminated.
63.85.117.146 11:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Jeff Zervas
It looks like I'll be doing a paper on this battle for a history class. I'll try to clean up the article a bit. Part of the trouble is that it looks like that previous contributors used this as a source: http://www.bakbakan.com/swishk/swk3-19.html which was written back in 1936, hence the lack of PC wording. It also looks like some of the langauge of the article used material from the source without properly citing it, might be some copyvio issues. On the other hand, some of the information in the article is inconsistent with the information in the source. This article could use some work. I'll go ahead and post a clean up notice... crazyeddie 00:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
...just from looking at the online sources. We should consolidate that article into this one, then streamline the collection. BusterD 23:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
The issue of the Colt 45 was a direct result of the Moro campaign, because of the 38's inability to stop a charging Muslim fanatic.
are you serious?
Each of these will have their own articles, and the first one is workable now. If my action seems premature, please revert. My intention is draw attention to the more accurate, more complete, better considered article. BusterD 01:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)