This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Military Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Military Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am intrigued by the above archived discussion. 5 supporters of the merge and 2 opposed. There are arguments given supporting the merger. There are no arguments given for why the articles should not merge. It seems to me that there is not a distinction of significance between "military" and "armed forces" so far as what would go into an article. As a Venn diagram these circles would be near perfectly overlapping or (at the very least) concentric. For those who were opposed, please explain. The distinction should probably be highlighted in one of the articles. -- MCG ( talk) 04:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Please see a discussion about the relationship between "Armed forces" and Military. Maurreen ( talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Military which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Military Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Military Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am intrigued by the above archived discussion. 5 supporters of the merge and 2 opposed. There are arguments given supporting the merger. There are no arguments given for why the articles should not merge. It seems to me that there is not a distinction of significance between "military" and "armed forces" so far as what would go into an article. As a Venn diagram these circles would be near perfectly overlapping or (at the very least) concentric. For those who were opposed, please explain. The distinction should probably be highlighted in one of the articles. -- MCG ( talk) 04:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Please see a discussion about the relationship between "Armed forces" and Military. Maurreen ( talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Military which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)